(Equinox)
Well, post 702 came out vaguer than I expected, and I don't know how to word that better. Let's just say I had reason to believe they weren't who they said they were, and I wanted to verify that with them. Either way, I found the answer on my own, and I do believe they were being honest in post 36. Unicorn Brethren, if you weren't and you were just trolling us or something, now is the time to tell me so I can put you on this skewer sooner.
Unicorn Brethren wrote:Stop prodding us. We're tactically lurking. FFS!
If you don't like the prodding, please replace out. I'm fucking sick and tired of you barely doing anything and flaunting hammers like you don't give a damn. Enough people are tired of this game that we don't need a slot trolling it. There are supposedly six of you in there; shape up or GTFO.
Though I don't think that rage is going to do any good because you guys are all scum and are just dicking around on the "They have 6 uncoordinated heads!" pass.
I might as well catch up now, too, while I have some motivation left for this game.
> My gut thinks it's unlikely that DaSpotthatkillsu and Frogito Ergo Sum are scum together, so it makes no sense for me to have scum reads on both of them. Still... DaSpotthatkillsu's post-hoc defense of BeaverWeasel was so terribly scum, and I still think Frogito Ergo Sum has been scummy, particularly with how they handled Greymarble's retraction of their Final Destination case on Day 1.
Can't they both die?
I need to reevaluate Frogito Ergo Sum. Yes, Equinox, again, dammit.
> Actually, in writing up a response to Greymarble's defense of DaSpotthatkillsu, I came to the realization why DaSpotthatkillsu seemed so sure of BeaverWeasel despite weak evidence. They're pretty certain that YosFlavouredCayke is scum, and if my memory serves correctly they're pretty sure of their second suspect (Frogito Ergo Sum, I think; forgive me for being lazy and not checking) as well. Being so convinced isn't good play, but I can see that happening. DaSpotthatkillsu is probably not scum.
> A response to Frogito Ergo Sum:
Frogito Ergo Sum wrote:A completely unforced retraction of a case isn't a priori scummy. As far as I can tell, you made a case based on the observation that Fate wasn't aggressive which you didn't actually agree with as a result of a general stance on meta. I, on the other hand, think meta arguments are wholly valid and your "retraction" meant nothing to me.
As I understand it, Greymarble retracted the case not because they didn't believe in meta but because they made the whole thing up. Greymarble even admitted to this, which makes your continued push with it on Day 1 bad.
> Super Vanilla Townie is probably town. My belief is that town are more likely than scum to find a game boring. Scum play picks out all the things wrong with a town and exploits it, and I'd imagine this would be quite thrilling in a player list like this one. On the other hand, town may find an environment boring and unsuitable if they can't get any solid reads on anyone.
GummyBear wrote:But now that SVT is requesting replacement...that slot has coasted for the past two game days through "catching up" but not actually catching up and eventually requesting replacement.
...and you still think them scum, Y/N?
Welp, this turned into a wall anyway.