tarsonisocelot wrote:Exactly my thoughts, and saying that the neighborized player should stay quiet about it seems to be a way to avoid scrutiny if no-one comes forward to claim that tomorrow.
I would think it'd be best not to shout "Hey! I'm neighbors with this guy!" whether or not you or the actual person you're with have claimed as I have. That's what I think anyways.
Perhaps my claim was too early in the game, though.
tarsonisocelot wrote:Voidedmafia wrote:
But then, that raises the question: Why go after me, then, since I haven't really tried to go after you?
This seemed out of place in response to the gambit. If you are town, your first reaction to being claimed to be scum by someone claiming investigative powers should be that they must be scum
I did come to the assumption that Rat must be scum, but that was after the knee-jerk "WTF!" reaction to the gambit wore off, and by that time I didn't think it'd be a wise move to say as much at that point (though, if I did, I stand (die?) corrected)
tarsonisocelot wrote: "Voidedmafia" wrote:
I know. -_- But I still detest being told to scumhunt like that.
In what circumstances do you not mind being expected to scumhunt?
I don't mind being asked to scumhunt or give my suspicions, like Fitz did. It can make the person decide and WANT to do so as well, though their reasons may very
I DO mind being imperatively told to do so. There's a difference. Saying it like Chk does makes your suspicions seem forced and made just to appease the town. At least, that's what I think.
tarsonisocelot wrote:At this stage, I view Fitz as town, PT Barnum as town and mike & Jahudo as town.
And I'd agree with you on all of them, though not quite as much with Jahudo.
tarsonisocelot wrote: Nacho has been helpful and reminded me of what made the gambit seem so convincing up until the moment of the reveal - Voided's reaction.
It wasn't the best reaction, obviously, and I really only have that I reacted in the heat of the moment (I did post pretty much right after Rat's post, after all). I would agree it would've gone better for me in the long run to have calmed down first.
I still hold that the reaction wasn't scummy, though. Just not a good reaction.
tarsonisocelot wrote:Voided also at one point described himself as "anti-town more than scummy".
I did?
tarsonisocelot wrote:At this point it seems obvious to me that I should UNVOTE: Pine and VOTE: Voidedmafia as Voided's behaviour during the gambit was the most suspicious thing so far in the game, and I'm no longer suspicious enough of Nacho or Fitz to vote for them and this wagon stands a good chance of leading to a lynch.
Nothing else AFTER the gambit, or during?
havingfitz wrote:Wow...I really think it's time for a lynch but I'm surprised at how quick
Voided's wagon just got to L-1
<------
.
Well, I would've given the same all caps warning tonight as I would've back on Saturday. I just wish the lynch wasn't on me.
tarsonisocelot wrote:I would be interested in Void's flip more than several others in the game but not as much as my top suspects. It would be good to get Void's "cases" on others before he is lynched...perhaps some last words. If anyone is worried about a no lynch happening I will place the hammer if it comes down to it.
I assure you, I will at the very least flip town-aligned, so the vote should go straight to Nacho next turn (unless he's NKed for some reason).
I'll go ahead and post my "note" on everyone (which are really just little paraphrased summaries of what each post is about from each of you), most likely in quotes.
And don't worry about hammering. Given that we need a lynch now and I fail to see how we could quickly turn a lynch any other way, I'll hammer myself.