Open 296: MAFIA WINS GONNA TEACH YOU TO BURN

[The_Kingpin]

/confirm

[The_Kingpin]

VOTE: Bella

The less Twilight in this game, the better.

[The_Kingpin]

VOTE: Bella

The less Twilight in this game, the better. For lack of a better joke.

[The_Kingpin]

I disagree with nacho's "obvscum, obvtown" post being legit. It was too soon to draw any inferences so it's odd that he's referring back to it.

[The_Kingpin]

I think it would be VERY prudent to wait for the mod before doing that. And for the record, I just didn't feel like thinking of any other random vote. I hate the RVS, and I almost always vote once and keep it there for awhile.

[The_Kingpin]

I think we should wait because the mod said he screwed up, but did not elaborate. Let's just say it would make more sense if you were me to wait for the mod's word.

Fair enough. I distributed a role PM to the original scumteam using bcc. Then I realized I had neglected to tell them who the scumteam was, so I sent a different role PM AND I ACCIDENTALLY COPIED THE WRONG PLAYER. Things have been re-randomized.

[The_Kingpin]

OK, since the mod has explained what happened, I figure it's OK to reveal. I was a VT; however, I was told that I was a mafia goon. From the game opening to being locked, I believed I was a goon; it was not until the locking that I found out I was a VT.

[The_Kingpin]

@ MrTrow: "He" is Iecerint in that post. I think we need to get everyone participating here, so VOTE: Hero for not posting in 4 days.

[The_Kingpin]

Nacho: You're really running with that RVS comment and a pressure vote? That's all you can do?

[The_Kingpin]

I think the fact that Nacho's arguments are a steaming pile of null crap is a good enough defense. How else exactly do i defend my so-called "slip" of trying to "defend" my second random vote? You don't see a situation where town would do that? Boy are you in for a shock then.

[The_Kingpin]

Who do you think is scum then Kingpin?

You and Nacho. I know that sounds like OMGUS, but it isn't. Nacho is grasping at straws and, presumably, going for a quick lynch. You, on the other hand, are grasping and the same straws and

definitely

going for a quick lynch, as evidenced by you saying you have reservations about the case against me, but are voting me anyway. You are voting me because you're scum, and giving doubts to cover yourself for when I flip town.

[The_Kingpin]

I've been pushing a case that I believe in.

That's my point. This is all it takes for you to believe in a case? Either you're scum going for an easy lynch or you're just latching onto a tiny thing just to see what happens. Obvscum because didn't want to think of another joke and a pressure vote? If Hero starts getting votes out of nowhere, or gets a replacement, I'll take mine off. Until then, I'm content to leave it where it is.

You're no Jack Kennedy.

Votecount
Mozamis (3): Hero764, lane0168, MrTrow
Hero764 (1): The_Kingpin

The_Kingpin (4): Nachomamma8, ThAdmiral, Iecerint, Stefunny

Stefunny (2): lynchking, Bella
lane0168 (1): Mozamis
Not voting: RangeroftheNorth

With 12 alive it takes 7 to lynch.

Deadline: April 17th

Looking for a replacement for lynchking.

[The_Kingpin]

It was originally a pressure vote. That was before it became obvious Hero needed a replacement.

[The_Kingpin]

Because if it wasn't there, I wouldn't be voting anyone. He's at one vote right now, so why bother.

[The_Kingpin]

Why do I have the feeling you were going to vote me whether I changed it or left it be....

[The_Kingpin]

OK fine dude. VOTE: Stefunny. I think she's more likely scum than Nacho because of her weak bandwagoning. Is it me or is this deadline really short?

[The_Kingpin]

Question for Iecerint: Will it still be "irrational" when I flip Town (assuming I get 2 more votes)?

[The_Kingpin]

EBWOP: Will it still be

considered

irrational

[The_Kingpin]

So, by your logic, it's rational to think I'm scum even though I'm town because my behavior fits some general pattern you've grown accustomed to seeing in scum, and you are willing to risk losing a pro-town player instead of exploring other options?

[The_Kingpin]

So, by your logic, it's rational to think I'm scum even though I'm town because my behavior fits some general pattern you've grown accustomed to seeing in scum, and you are willing to risk losing a pro-town player instead of exploring other options?

Thinking someone is scum because they act like scum seems completely rational to me. Why explore other options once you think you've found scum? Its best to remain focused on one player until either you think they aren't scum anymore or you lynch them.

If that's so, it'll suck to be you once this day is over and you realized you lynched a pro-town player with a crappy case.

[The_Kingpin]

k. I'm Cop.

[The_Kingpin]

I'll hammer since Stefunny seems to be gone. In honor of the death of the retarded case against me,

no lynch

.

[The_Kingpin]

And yes to your question, dear.

[The_Kingpin]

@Nacho - I did vote....

@Ranger - Please do.

What does CC stand for?

[The_Kingpin]

>_< omg. Maybe you are a Jack Kennedy after all.

VOTE: No Lynch, though I think it's already the majority.

[The_Kingpin]

Stefunny is scum. VOTE: stefunny

Night Two has started. Deadline for all night actions is Monday April 17th at midnight. Don't make me come get you.

[The_Kingpin]

Dammit! Ovrezealous people....at least tomorrow will be shortest day ever.

[The_Kingpin]

Nothing to add today. VOTE: Stefunny.

[The_Kingpin]

So, I guess we're having a real discussion today? I got an innocent btw.

[The_Kingpin]

ThAdmiral is innocent. I also investiagted the now deceased doc.

[The_Kingpin]

Care to explain that vote switch, Emp?

[The_Kingpin]

Care to explain that vote switch, Emp?

It looks too eager.

....

It's just as eager as your vote.

Vote: Emp

That was pretty eager too I suppose.

[The_Kingpin]

Care to explain that vote switch, Emp?

It looks too eager.

....

It's just as eager as your vote.

Don't be an idiot. Lane's vote wasn't rational. There was one argument and suddenly Ranger is certainally scum? Too eager.

That's the same logic you used.

[The_Kingpin]

Your own argument that her vote was too eager. One argument, and suddenly lane is scum.

[The_Kingpin]

I'll hammer if the momentum hasn't changed by tomorrow evening.

[The_Kingpin]

VOTE: lane

If lane is town, I'd be weary of Empking. Bad arguments.

[The_Kingpin]

Go town.

And Bin Laden is dead! Woot!