Damn it, yesterday was not a good day. Headaches everywhere.
That being said, let's address what's been asked:
rockynpoika wrote:
In post 20, you say you are going to wait to see other actions (lurking) because lurking is scummy. Please clarify.
There wasn't too much action going on from some players, specially the ones that still had their RVS votes at the time.
rockynpoika wrote:
Also, do you see anything scummy about using a random generator or voting for the moderator?
In all honesty those actions were due to me taking the start of RVS as a moment to jokevote. It's when people react to said jokevotes that the game picks up.
rockynpoika wrote:
Also, what do you think about Sisterman and projectmatt, particularly about the case for projectmatt?
On the Sisterman case, it's somewhat confused as it's entirely based on
only one post, and a short one at that. That being said, as I mentioned, it's a joke vote. There's not any info behind such a vote because it's a joke, and as such it has no serious meaning, so the point stands, not only for me but to other early Randvotes like Mogri's, Rocky's and Matt's.
As for the Sisterman case, it seems rather more interesting. Yes, something about the timestamps excuse on #26 is somewhat irking me, but Jason's #27 is much, much worse in my eyes.
Votes are serious things as they apply pressure on players this early. Of course there's not going to be a full blown bandwagon as it would be stupid scumplaying. Besides it's evident by now the pressure has shifted towards other players, namely Rocky and Matt.
On #41, he mentions how being cautious is a scumslip. Of course scum take care of what do they say, but then so does town. After all, the point of mafia is to choose your words in a way that drives suspicion far from you while hunting and accusing scum to the other players. At least this is how town plays.
Another point that I find interesting is how Rocky
vocally
bandwagons on projectmatt. This sounds too suspicious to my ears.
Vote: JasonT1981
FoS: Rockynpoika
And now some questions.
@Jason: So why is town supposed to be less careful with what they say? Isn't that going to make them prone to commit mistakes that scum can use to their advantage?
@Rocky: Why do you think the case on Matt is more promising? I'm curious.
Oh damnit Sisterman replacement. Oh well, that means a fresh new face for us to examine. Bring it on!