Day One
With
Deadline for Day One is 12:00am EST on 4/20/2011
what do you mean prove? say, what if i was roleblocked etc.Oso wrote: Take this up again tomorrow Javert, after a night to at least give TS a chance to prove his claim.
how?Javert wrote:and Twistedspoon has spent his last several posts (as well as posts before I used my shot) to try to undermine me as opposed to hunting scum.
I don't like that you are already making excuses.Twistedsppon wrote:what do you mean prove? say, what if i was roleblocked etc.
Okay, so maybe I didn't mention him much, but I don't put everything I think about the game in my posts. I did feel he was scum, just not enough to write about before then.farside22 wrote:MW: The only time you mention klaz was to ask me about my read and to answer questions. Then the post before you vote for him you said you would read him then voted him the next post.
Before EA you called Oso town that was not at the very beginning.
Me=Weird wrote:Maxous, can you please consolidate why you think I'm scum into one post. Thanks.
I can see Oso as an alternate lynch, seeing as how EA made a good point about believing the claims and still suspecting them.
Also, 244 by klazam, he accuses me and PS of role-fishing for mentioning the "I'll find out tonight", but, completely ignores 179, by oso, which was pointing out ender's softclaim, which could also be role-fishing. This could definitely be scum together, with klazam not wanting to spread suspicion on his partner.
Twistedspoon is. I'd also live with a lynch of Rhinox, farside, or Maxous even though those are null reads atm. I definitely don't want to lynch MeWeird, NEvil, Prosaurus, Javert, Quilford or you.Juls wrote:@EA, I don't think Oso is gonna swing today. I think we should re-evaluate him tomorrow. Who is your second choice?
No. A run down on everybody in the game does not help the town. I am not telling the scum who the safe night kills are. I'm going to mention players and issues that are important to discuss and that I have something to say about.farside22 wrote:I find your lack of push on anyone not already mentioned disturbing and would like a full view on everyone in the game from you.
You brought up the possibility of my lynch to see if there was any support for it. If it was clear that I was lynchable you could vote me with less risk. At least that's what I think you were doing there. I don't see another reason why you would mention other people's opinion on me.Me=Weird wrote:Can you rephrase this, because I'm having a hard time seeing what you're saying.NE wrote:Why even bring up the bold part if I'm just lower on your scum list? You're suggesting the possibility of my lynch without any commitment. You're looking for people to respond with support for my lynch.
There is nothing wrong with being confrontational. There is something wrong with being confrontational and aggressive most of the time and then being conciliatory towards somebody who is stuck on you. I think you'd be just as confrontational towards Maxous if you were town.Me=Weird wrote:I'm not overreacting. I am saying what your post made me think. Is there something wrong with being confrontational? Despite that Maxous has been tunneling on me, I do think he's town, and of course I want him to move his vote.NE wrote:See how you're overreacting here? That shows that you're confrontational in your defense most of the time. Maxous has been on you for quite a while and, despite your best efforts, you can't shake him. The way you posted indicates that you know Maxous is town and want to please him so he will vote somebody else.
If you're not going to bother to read the explanation I gave in that post then I'm not going to bother explaining it again.Me=Weird wrote:NE wrote:My strongest scum read is on TS??NE wrote:VOTE: Me=Weird
Post counts are a terrible way to measure contribution. Would you be thinking any differently if I had posted lots of smaller posts instead? I've contributed my fair share ofJuls wrote:@NE, I am not concerned with your V/LA. It has more to do with the fact that you have a whopping 15 posts. Of those 15, one was your intro post, another was saying you were getting caught up, another was your V/LA post, and finally a post saying Javert was one-shot vig. So that REALLY brings your total of any substance to 11. To put it in perspective, here are the other post counts:
ender (31) - been dead for a while
EA(41)
farside (52)
Javert (37)
Juls (42)
Klaz (25)
Max (36)
M=W (26)
Oso (60)
Pro (42)
Rhinox (37)
TS (66)
Hell, even the mod has 17. The only person who doesn't have TWICE as many posts as you is M=W who is the leading wagon and Klazham (who I obviously am not even looking at).
It's quite a plausible concern..Juls wrote:I don't like that you are already making excuses.Twistedsppon wrote:what do you mean prove? say, what if i was roleblocked etc.
You think Prosaurus might be a mafia pushing for your lynch after a mason claim?Juls wrote: I also don't like that Prosaurus is so reluctant to believe the mason claim. I am, however, still deciding if it is inherently scummy to not believe the claim or not.
Deadline is tomorrow and there is'nt a hope of Erratus being lynched.Prosaurus wrote:Why don't you want to lynch those people?
Also: VOTE: Erratus Apathos because you're my second scummiest suspect due to the "THEY ARE SCUM FOR SURE EVERYONE VOTE THEM!" etc.
It's only provable by a flip.Twistedspoon wrote:indeed, with my theory of the one-shot theme, it would be rather risky for scum to claim masons in a game which we don't know masons exist
In fact, I've never had masons in any other mini normal game that I've been
I believe the claim; like Juls says, It's provavble
ExactlyNecessary Evil wrote: Post counts are a terrible way to measure contribution.
He has tried to explain his thoughts from what I've seen.Erratus Apathos wrote: This is not. This is scum looking for some chink in the attack rather than defending or explaining the point being made against them.
But his participation would be nice before night though.Maxous wrote:About Quilford..he can catch up during the night period if needs be. He's certainly not going to be lynched today either way.
Oso is scum for:Prosaurus wrote:How exactly are you so sure he's scum? Same for the others you think are scum.
It's mostly the reactions I quoted above. Although voting Oso also helpsfarside22 wrote:EA: How or what defines for you MW as town besides that one post? I say lack of scum hunting and BWing is more likely to come from scum.
Oso wrote:But his participation would be nice before night though.Maxous wrote:About Quilford..he can catch up during the night period if needs be. He's certainly not going to be lynched today either way.
@MOD: Day or two deadline extension, maybe? Seeing as how Quilford replaced in so close to deadline
And the other two people?Erratus Apathos wrote:Seriously, we're making MW claim? This town is headdesk city.
Oso is scum for:Prosaurus wrote:How exactly are you so sure he's scum? Same for the others you think are scum.
believing Ender and TS's claims for no real reason
pushing a no-lynch for crap reasons
and then not having a town reaction to my attack on him
It's mostly the reactions I quoted above. Although voting Oso also helpsfarside22 wrote:EA: How or what defines for you MW as town besides that one post? I say lack of scum hunting and BWing is more likely to come from scum.
What lack of scumhunting? Looking at MW's iso, I see plenty of scumhunting.