Hey guys. My apologies for not posting. I've been really busy with Easter stuff and schoolwork is beginning to get really overwhelming. I'll try and keep up with reading as I can, and I'll devote part of my weekend to just mafia. I know I'm pretty far behind, so assume my stuff has the "at that time" qualifier.
@S_C:
#62: I was suspicious of you because bad player=/=scum. Further zdenek pointed out suspicious things in 55.
@Jase:
#63 &
#64: How was I stealing your shtick? Also, I called you on sheeping because
37 looked like you voted merely to satisfy imaginality rather than because you yourself supported the vote.
@StefanB:
#70(specifically where you responded to me): You had originally fussed about how yabba is "Best IC" and I assumed you were voting him because he didn't act like "Best IC." I just don't see how this is justification for a vote, though.
@Uncle Pain:
#71: Now this is a very interesting post! You do realize that in your posts before this, you gave nothing at all similar to this reasoning. That was why I voted you. While I generally don't like backtracking, I'll let it slide since it's early in the game and will accordingly
UNVOTE: Uncle Pain
@Me=Weird: How did I make the bottom of your null/undecided list in
#72, or were these in no particular order?
Post
#88 reeks of hypocrisy.
Post
#91 lacks views on other players apart from Jase; this is starting to become consistent.
@Zdenek:
#93: You commented on one of the first posts page 1. Further my post was very early on page one, while yours was the second to last.
Post
#102 reads very scummy to me. Rather then criticizing reasoning, he just backs up his votes with unsupported statements. The defense of it in
#105 reads as if he's either twisting zdenek's words or misinterpreting them.
Quoted for Truth:
yabbaguy wrote:@Mod:
You are being VERY strict. I encourage you to look at the ruleset much more holistically and look into the intent as to why each rule exists. I fear that at this rate, we are going to have game-wrecking modkills based on loopholes.
I'll leave it at that, and I have no intention of arguing this further.
Hey Andrew, since you skim walls, this one's for you:
Post
#114 looks like wagonhopping so badly.
Post
#120: OK StefanB
is
misinterpreting zdenek. Stefan, zdenek was trying to say that you defending rhetorical questions is scummy. He was not trying to say that you were actively lurking. What he did say however, was that your defense to his accusation was active lurking. If you don't understand the difference between what zdenek is saying and what you are trying to defend, then ask me, and I'll try to explain it better.
I don't see this specific point as scummy as it looks like a genuine misinterpretation.
I'll read more in depth into 122 when I get the time.
Post
#125: Very helpful post. Who are your scum reads, Uncle Pain?
Jase wrote:crazypianist1116 wrote:Very Suspicious:
Uncle Pain
Jase
Carcinogen
Jase:
Jase wrote:Imaginality: Oh sorry should I be voting Yabba?
I'll set this right with a quick
Unvote
vote: Yabba
I'm so glad you're watching out for me!
READ: Oh sorry I'm being scummy? Let me sheep this vote so I look better in everyone's eyes without explaining my actions at all!
The Uncle Pain vote makes looks like he's just trying to get off of the yabbaguy case and attack an easy target.
Carcinogen: The Jase vote looks opportunistic.
By his logic, bad players say they're good. Thus Jase saying he's a good player is neither a scumtell nor nulltell, but a bad player tell.
Further he hasn't don't much in terms of content. His defense against zdenek calling him lurkish is more lack of content and trying to say zdenek has not done any scum hunting when he has.
Crazypianist accuses me of something that's extremely scummy. Then turns around and calls SCs suspicions of me opportunistic. If he really believed my that my intentions were as he said why didn't he vote for me (Why didn't you)? Also what's the difference between your suspicion and Surprise_Carcinogens?
This came out of nowhere! You've had almost 3 pages to say this yet you wait till now? Scummy. I didn't vote you because I voted Uncle Pain at the time. That much should be obvious. S_C's suspicion looked opportunistic (i.e. "Here's my chance to push a lynch of a townie"). You even quoted my reasoning for not liking the vote (bolded above).
Me=Weird wrote:New reads: I can see Jase as town, but adding crazypianist to scumlist. The way he was sarcastic seems like how scum would be, general scumvibes, plus the way once stefan got attacked, he completely lurked off, could be scum scared by their partner getting caught and not wanting to do anything scummy.
Sarcasm and lurking are great scumtells! Especially when I wasn't posting elsewhere on the site.
VOTE: [L]
She's been doing a ton of talking without throwing around suspicion at all. This is particularly scummy behavior. The vote was useless essentially the entire game as it hasn't really been accompanied by much pressure and the unvote came out of nowhere. Also on my scumlist (in no particular order) are Jase, andrew94, Surprise_Carcinogen, and StefanB.
Tl; dr: Go up to Jase's quote.