bvoigt wrote:
@Zdenek: What's your read on C-Worl?
Looking at him in ISO, he started off thinking [L] was scummy, which is fine.
I agree with the point against him for bringing up unusual third party roles (Jester, Governor).
I really hate his ISO 6, and in particular this:
C-Worl wrote:
Now, can I get tarson, zdenek, crazypianist, and uncle pain in their own words in the shortest paragraph possible why they think [L] is scum.
Can I also get yabba, redtail, [L], and prox in their own words in the shortest paragraph possible why they think tarsonisocelot is scum.
Consider yourselves as trying to win over my vote. Failure to comply will be seen as you sheeping to the wagon that you're on.
He's voted for [L] without giving a reason, but as he unvotes, he demands everyone else give cases. It seems hypocritical to me.
As far as the hammer goes, it was anti-town, but I don't buy the argument that scum would do it because Jase pointed out how anti-town it was.
His play today reads like he is resigned to his lynch.
Overall, his play is definitely anti-town, and the only thing that makes me think that he could be town is that don't think that scum would hammer after being told not to.
UP wrote:
It’s convenient to completely agree with the preceding slot player. It’s supposed to look consistent but in fact it looks opportunistic and can be seen as minimising the effort put into the reads. Hence the scumminess.
I'm having a hard time buying that you actually believe this because you're basically accusing bvoigt of being obvious scum - giving reads that are lazy, and just an attempt at being consistent or opportunistic, but you don't attack him for it nearly strongly enough.
Me=Weird wrote:
@everybody expressing suspicion of C-worl not voting him: Is there any good reason you don't want to hammer?
Jase has told everyone to not hammer. Why are you asking this?