IceyCupcake wrote:I don't particularly like Pine as scum this time around
And yet your vote remains on me...don't have a real scumread to put it on?
SGRaaize wrote:LynchMePlz voted here, with remarks on how my FoS'es are inconsistent or whatever, they aren't, I think that he knew at this point this BW was indeed picking steam, and he could safely vote me. The only person I'm almost 100% sure is Mafia in my BW.
LynchMePls wrote:SGRaaize wrote:Also, I also gotta reveal my reads, cause all the cool kids are or will be doing it.
Town-read on WC and Icey.
Scum-read on LynchMePlz
Way-Too-Serious-Read on Pine
This is a scummy post. Is having a scum read while parking your vote on RVS something you think is town? A way to serious read means what exactly?
Hey Gandalf, where are your breadcrumbs, bro?
Breadcrumb hunting?
I would like you to explain all of those reads. Also, I'd like you to explain why exactly you are hunting for a players breadcrumbs. My only concern is that I'm not sure scum would be this ridiculously obvious. Looks "too scummy to be scum", but I hate those arguments. I think you're the best place for a vote now.
ABR wrote:I have a simple question, does everyone have at least one damaging ability?
My role PM suggests everyone does.
ABR wrote:Only answer if yes, obviously.
Can you explain what possible good this fishing does? How is "only answer if yes" in any way helpful, since those who don't answer are saying no!?
Unvote
Vote: SGR
LynchMePls wrote:Riceballtail wrote:@Soben: You know that I'm scum from one post, namely a RVS post? You know... there are two kinds of people in this world: those that can extrapolate data from inconclusive information and...
+scum points for over defensiveness. Also note the insinuation that we can't know RBT is scum from one RVS post, not that we can't know RBT is scum at all.
Þç¬ÕêåÒéÆÞ¿▒ÒüòÒü¬ÒüìÒéâõ╗ûÕàÑÒééÞ¿▒ÒüøÒü¬Òüä
Riceballtail wrote:Note how they comment on the other two, but have no reason for me to be in the list, much less vote.
Soben wrote:Simple, witholding reasoning for my FoS at this stage of the game allows me to moniter said players reactions to the FoS. Rices reaction in this case proves that she's following the thread without providing any imput herself solidifying my vote on her. An example of this proving effective is in Newbie 1078 where Tragedy started flailing when reasoning wasn't attached to a FoS on her.
Riceballtail wrote:Are you able to filter the difference between "finger of suspicion" and "vote"?
SGR wrote:After that, you entered the frame, voted WC for still trying to go for RVS (Curiously ignoring me, even though I was quoted by WC on the post you quoted doing the exact same thing) and started with the whole "BOO, RVS SUCKS". I didn't suspect Pine as much because Pine agreed with you but didn't seem that bothered about it, plus, he commented before he didn't mind RVS and serious talk "intersphering", so I saw that more as a null-tell than a scum-tell, which is what I saw on you.
Hope that explains it.
WrathChild wrote:LynchMePls wrote:SGRaaize wrote:Also, I also gotta reveal my reads, cause all the cool kids are or will be doing it.
Town-read on WC and Icey.
Scum-read on LynchMePlz
Way-Too-Serious-Read on Pine
This is a scummy post. Is having a scum read while parking your vote on RVS something you think is town? A way to serious read means what exactly?
Hey Gandalf, where are your breadcrumbs, bro?
Breadcrumb hunting?
I would like you to explain all of those reads. Also, I'd like you to explain why exactly you are hunting for a players breadcrumbs. My only concern is that I'm not sure scum would be this ridiculously obvious. Looks "too scummy to be scum", but I hate those arguments. I think you're the best place for a vote now.
ABR wrote:I have a simple question, does everyone have at least one damaging ability?
My role PM suggests everyone does.
ABR wrote:Only answer if yes, obviously.
Can you explain what possible good this fishing does? How is "only answer if yes" in any way helpful, since those who don't answer are saying no!?
Unvote
Vote: SGR
I want in on this Wagon, I agree with LMP. Throwing out town reads based on nothing is scummy.
UNVOTE, VOTE: SGR
Amrun wrote:
VOTE: IceyCupcake
They are either town or third-party that doesn't interfere with town, imho, and I'll give this a go and see what happens.
I contest this modifier. I've been scum in your eyes for how long?gandalf5166 wrote:Amrun wrote:
VOTE: IceyCupcake
They are either town or third-party that doesn't interfere with town, imho, and I'll give this a go and see what happens.
Wow. You acknowledge that they aren't harmful to town. And then you vote for them. Why the FUCK?
Unvote
VOTE: Amrun
InHim and LMP arestillscum though. SGR is town.
LynchMePls wrote:You have a "too serious" read on Pine. {Editor's note: WTF does that even mean? How the fuck is that even noteworthy?}
Then I make a post that you decide is scummy.
Then Pine agrees with me verbatim.
Then you post your reads, and Pine is "too serious" and I'm "scum".
And you see no inconsistancy here at all?
Pine wrote:So was that nervous, approval-seeking "Why is everyone ignoring me?" comment.
inHimshallibe wrote:I contest this modifier. I've been scum in your eyes for how long?gandalf5166 wrote:Amrun wrote:
VOTE: IceyCupcake
They are either town or third-party that doesn't interfere with town, imho, and I'll give this a go and see what happens.
Wow. You acknowledge that they aren't harmful to town. And then you vote for them. Why the FUCK?
Unvote
VOTE: Amrun
InHim and LMP arestillscum though. SGR is town.
FOS one way, vote another, FOS two more ways.
unvote
vote: gandalf