h3ll0 wrote:
@thunderwielder: You are contradicting yourself. If seeker69 is not posting enough, how is he being "playing well"? Similarly, his replacee, alpnka did little to contribute, and generally flew under the radar.
Nope, I'm not. Read it again. I said "isn't". Also, my speculation was conditional that IF you were town, Seeker would have to be scum (because it's really unlikely for Work and Chk to be scum, considering how hard they are going on each other, especially when I'm putting all this pressure on you). But I don't think he is because he isn't playing well.
And also, in all scenarios, you guys are assuming me to be scum.
We're all really not. Read the posts again. We've gone through the possible scenarios where you are scum and where you aren't scum. Here I think you're just trying to appeal to emotions.
As for your reasons for voting Fatso, my apologies, I didn't see those in the post above.
However, I still take issue with the the post where you cite him. Bulvious pointed out that he didn't think that the fence sitting was too much of an issue. You THEN provided your quotes from Fatso and said that he was contradicting himself, but you never really responded to
And finally, if:
I believe that chkflip's gambit makes him more likely to be town than scum to be honest.
Who is therefore scum? It seemed Chk was on the top of your suspicions list, and now you're switching? Who is the other scum then, Work or me, and WHY?