ThAd:
Yes, I messed up by backing off of Archaist in [213]. I concede that this was suspicious and I deserve some scrutiny for it. But *not* for the reason you listed. Certainly not when I spent most of yesterday being accused of pushing the kuz/Archaist bandwagon. Now you're accusing me of being kuz/Archaist's partner for trying to push his mislynch, yet in a way that wouldn't earn me towncred...?
In any case, I counter whatever suspicion I incurred by pointing out that I derailed the MK counterwagon. As for the rest of your suspect list-
Why would sAb post [254] if he were Archaist's comafia?
Why aren't Fishy and Rhinox on your suspect list?
Rhinox:
Vote: Rhinox
Just for fun, what's your explanation for that fake lynching vote?
Leftover from yesterday:
The difference is that I decided that MK was innocent because of what *MK* did.
You decided that kuz was innocent when other players voted kuz.
Rhinox wrote:"Rhinox who meanwhile is arguing that mafia would be doing the exact thing he himself is doing." - I don't follow
It's in reference to this:
Rhinox wrote:Emp unvoting as soon as Mits wagon gets a little momentum is like... *twitch*. Kinda makes me rethink because I believe scum empking would keep bussing at this point if thats really whats going on rather than unvoting, because if mits really is scum, once he flips this would look really bad for emp.
At that point, *you* thought MK was mafia.
So the one who "kept bussing" MK was... you.
iama:
Leftover from yesterday: I saw the logic behind process-of-eliminating MK. Couldn't see any reason to process-of-eliminate sAb.
(And for the record, I'm over that weird feeling I had yesterday regarding you. Sorry)