plague: when was the first time?
juls: its not that i think you're scummy. its that i am having difficulty reconciling your actions. to explain, i will present to you four reasons why i think you may have hammered kalofer without a claim on day 1 after expressing ZERO suspicion of him. i will number them from what i think most likely to least likely.
1) juls is neighbor. she has spoken with kalofer outside the game per her role ability. she determined that his response to pressure and his activity in the QT points to the fact that he may, in fact, be scum. couple that with the mathematical probablility of having town neighbors in a game, and neighborjuls thinks "well, i'm town, so if there is a scum neighbor, i know its kalofer. he's not responding well, the QT has gone silent, so i don't see harm in hammering because
i know
he isn't doc/cop/etc."
this was most likely imo. this is not possible, morthas has claimed neighbor.
2) juls is cop/doc/etc. and eager to get to night phase, doesn't really care who gets lynched as long as its not her. i would generally expect to see this behavior from an investigative power role, as protective roles generally lurk and stay out of the limelight. copjuls could even justify the scummy hammer with "well, i wanted to make sure i didn't get roleblocked/nk'd.
this is still a possibility. however, you soft-claimed, then retracted it with the "well its about an ongoing game" thing, so i am not sure what to think.
3) juls is scum with kalofer. saw the oppurtunity to bus into serious towncred and took it. maybe was frustrated with her partner for getting to L-1 and not responding well. small game, town cred could go a long way.
4) juls is vt thinking its funny to hammer someone without a claim on day 1.
least likely.
if you are scum, allowing ourselves to let you live beyond today gives you a serious upperhand. and by live, i mean, i would like you to L-1 and then claim. if you are power, then we glean some info and lynch elsewhere. if you claim vt, we lynch you because 3 is much more likely than 4. got it?
i don't have an issue with your wicked wagon. i think the game needs action and the fact that we lynched scum on day 1 and avoided the first nk means we're in good shape. hopefully doc has breadcrumbed their protect so we at least have a cleared townie tomorrow if doc should get hit tonight. but whatever. if you think its scummy to support wagons then i don't know what to tell you. i'm not going to just sit here and believe that vt juls just up and decided to hammer a player on day 1 without a claim and with no good reason.