Cultural Revolution is Over!

BabyJesus · Post Post #13 (isolation #0) » Tue Feb 21, 2006 3:39 am

"Inspire the struggle of revolutionary people !"

yaay.

vote Pug89

BabyJesus · Post Post #36 (isolation #1) » Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:20 pm

vte Y

choo, choo!!

BabyJesus · Post Post #170 (isolation #2) » Mon Feb 27, 2006 1:23 am

unvote, vote twomz

BabyJesus · Post Post #174 (isolation #3) » Mon Feb 27, 2006 8:24 am

unvote, vote Vaughn

BabyJesus · Post Post #176 (isolation #4) » Mon Feb 27, 2006 8:28 am

The Unwritten wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
unvote, vote Vaughn
How does that work?

Unvote
vote: BabyJesus

how does what work? unvoting and revoting? you seem to have figured it out....

BabyJesus · Post Post #178 (isolation #5) » Mon Feb 27, 2006 8:31 am

Vaughn wrote:BJ- so that's how it's gonna be?

hi...

you should probably claim...

BabyJesus · Post Post #182 (isolation #6) » Mon Feb 27, 2006 9:18 am

The Unwritten wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:how does what work? unvoting and revoting? you seem to have figured it out....
With not even a bit of explanation.
Yeah, I get the hang of it now.

good info here

BabyJesus · Post Post #206 (isolation #7) » Tue Feb 28, 2006 5:41 pm

so we can't unvote....

looks like a nolynch today then most likely.

BabyJesus · Post Post #322 (isolation #8) » Tue Mar 07, 2006 3:45 pm

unvote, vote Tamuz

BabyJesus · Post Post #333 (isolation #9) » Wed Mar 08, 2006 4:34 pm

Tamuz wrote:Tamuz=/=Twomz

good info here

BabyJesus · Post Post #410 (isolation #10) » Tue Mar 14, 2006 4:18 am

unvote, vote CES

BabyJesus · Post Post #425 (isolation #11) » Tue Mar 14, 2006 5:29 pm

let's just lynch CES....

BabyJesus · Post Post #432 (isolation #12) » Tue Mar 14, 2006 6:01 pm

Glork wrote:Okay, enough of this. CES is one of my masons. GTFO his wagon now.

BabyJesus · Post Post #433 (isolation #13) » Tue Mar 14, 2006 6:01 pm

Glork wrote:Okay, enough of this. CES is one of my masons. GTFO his wagon now.

so you were told mason as your role...

Are you confirmed innocent...

BabyJesus · Post Post #444 (isolation #14) » Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:55 am

unvote, vote mlaker

BabyJesus · Post Post #467 (isolation #15) » Wed Mar 15, 2006 8:43 am

Twomz wrote:
unvote
I guess the vote for myself didn't count... Anyways, mlaker has 24 hours to respond before i teh lynch him. (i'm sure someone else will beat me too it... but this is just a warning that i plan on lynching him tomorrow after i eat my lunch).

Also, @ Fritz: I'm vanilla, (Chinese Peasant to be specific) and other people came forth to say that they were "Chinese Peasant"s too... but you shouldn't believe all of them... they could easily be scum trying to get clearance from my awesome confirmzored role.

DO IT!!!! FINISH HIM!!!

BabyJesus · Post Post #474 (isolation #16) » Wed Mar 15, 2006 11:18 am

DO IT

BabyJesus · Post Post #502 (isolation #17) » Mon Mar 20, 2006 9:19 am

has thok outed himself as a sk again....

vote thok

BabyJesus · Post Post #650 (isolation #18) » Sat Mar 25, 2006 2:47 pm

unvote, vote The Unwritten

BabyJesus · Post Post #659 (isolation #19) » Sun Mar 26, 2006 6:43 am

Yosarian2 wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:unvote, vote The Unwritten

Interesting timing. Any specific reason why you're voting the unwritten now, right after everyone else unvoted him?

His claim sounds like a fake to me, that's all. He carries around cartloads of sparrows? seriously?

BabyJesus · Post Post #693 (isolation #20) » Tue Mar 28, 2006 4:39 pm

awesome

unvote, vote fritz

BabyJesus · Post Post #751 (isolation #21) » Mon Apr 03, 2006 9:26 am

Shamrock

I can't stand people moaning about "wifom" instead of actually addressing points.

BabyJesus · Post Post #752 (isolation #22) » Mon Apr 03, 2006 9:27 am

BabyJesus wrote:
vote: Shamrock

I can't stand people moaning about "wifom" instead of actually addressing points.

vote sham I meant

BabyJesus · Post Post #774 (isolation #23) » Mon Apr 03, 2006 11:49 am

Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:You specifically got told he was an SK? Nice.

unvote, vote: Pug89

*shakes fist* We'll get you yet, Y(and BJ).

me? what did I do....

BabyJesus · Post Post #775 (isolation #24) » Mon Apr 03, 2006 11:49 am

unvote, vote pbung

BabyJesus · Post Post #783 (isolation #25) » Mon Apr 03, 2006 3:40 pm

vote Pug89

BabyJesus · Post Post #803 (isolation #26) » Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:41 am

Glork wrote:He's lurked and voted for a likely-confirmed Peasant (on "I don't like people who harp on WIFOM logic" reasoning), mainly.

Y isn't in a very good position either. I just want to see how BJ responds to the allegations against him.

is that the best you can come up with? lol. You're not very good at this, are you?

BabyJesus · Post Post #812 (isolation #27) » Sat Apr 08, 2006 10:18 am

Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Why not? I'm a mason. That's a pretty good reason to follow me.

why? you're not a cop, you have jack shit for info. In fact, you are highly misleading the town here, this is an INCREDIBLY scummy wagon me. Voting me for not bandwagoning people? what a joke.

Masons = full of shit

BabyJesus · Post Post #813 (isolation #28) » Sat Apr 08, 2006 10:18 am

Twomz wrote:I'm going to hope that the masons know what they're doing.
Vote: BJ
.

they don't.

BabyJesus · Post Post #815 (isolation #29) » Sat Apr 08, 2006 10:21 am

chamber wrote:I was told to withhold info longer was I not?
Vote:bj
I agree with you guys.

you obviously did not agree enough to investgate me...

BabyJesus · Post Post #818 (isolation #30) » Sat Apr 08, 2006 10:24 am

Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Ooh, BJ is bitter.

And the playstyle argument cuts both ways, BJ. I'm not going to vote you over bandwagonning, but then I'm also going to vote you over to not bandwagonning. You can't it have both ways.

All that tells me is you have no idea what my scum tell is, and are desparate for any weak reason to lynch me. Was I bandwagon-happy last time I was scum?? Or are you too lazy to look it up?

BabyJesus · Post Post #819 (isolation #31) » Sat Apr 08, 2006 10:25 am

Bacde wrote:You aren't seriously rolleyeing the cop now are you?

he's not voting based on investigation, so I will rolleyes whoever I please.

BabyJesus · Post Post #826 (isolation #32) » Sat Apr 08, 2006 1:26 pm

Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:
Thok wrote: It's possible that rather than being masons, you and Glork are some of the Red Guard leaders faking a mason claim.
Yeah, and that's how we knew the flavour of the mason groups and about the recruitability.

Besides, we haven't done anything really scummy.

trying to get the innocent BabyJesus lynched is pretty scummy....

BabyJesus · Post Post #828 (isolation #33) » Sat Apr 08, 2006 2:08 pm

mystery meat of doom wrote: On a more relevant note, I really don't see a reason to blindly follow the masons, so I'm not going to.

I would not be surprised if we have at least one scum among the group that blindly followed the mason vote without a word of reasoning on their own.

baa.... baa....

BabyJesus · Post Post #830 (isolation #34) » Sat Apr 08, 2006 3:19 pm

vote Pooky

pretty clear at this point the way he blindly hopped onto a pro-town bandwagon that he is scum...

BabyJesus · Post Post #835 (isolation #35) » Sat Apr 08, 2006 4:51 pm

PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Hell Yea Glork got my back!!

unvote

vote SOS

*high fives Glork*

pretty sure you're scum here, guy.

BabyJesus · Post Post #844 (isolation #36) » Sun Apr 09, 2006 8:36 am

chamber wrote:
Coron wrote:
vote: Tamuz

That is unless I missed somethng totally obvious that makes him protown.

I don't really like the baby wagon today.
I, however, Like the bj wagon a lot.

And that is supposed to mean something?

BabyJesus · Post Post #851 (isolation #37) » Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:10 am

Glork wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
chamber wrote:I, however, Like the bj wagon a lot.
And that is supposed to mean something?
It might mean something. Chamber has not yet said anything about his investigation result from this past night -- he's given us neither a name nor an indication of "innocent/guilty."

So it's distinctly possible that he got a guilty result on you, which would explain why he likes the wagon so much.

I can already tell you that is not the case.

BabyJesus · Post Post #853 (isolation #38) » Mon Apr 10, 2006 3:36 am

Twomz wrote:BJ, the reason i'm still voting you is because 2 confirmed townies (who can talk at night) are acting like they've found something on you. I'm not sure why they haven't revealed what it is... i'm hopeful that they at least have some idea of what they're talking about..

they're masons. they "discovered" nothing at night. But your utter inability to think forself and attempt to just follow along the masons like a sheep is noted.

baa.....baa.....

BabyJesus · Post Post #856 (isolation #39) » Mon Apr 10, 2006 8:12 am

Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Instincts. I don't think he's acting like his usual self. And he's calling other people sheep. I don't have anything concrete on BJ, but that's pretty impossibly anyways. Follow me and prosper!

I suggest letting others do the heavy lifting for a while, guy.

BabyJesus · Post Post #857 (isolation #40) » Mon Apr 10, 2006 8:13 am

Yosarian2 wrote:(shrug) When in doubt, there's nothing wrong with following a confirmed innocent. If you follow someone who's confirmed, they may be right or they may be wrong. If you're following someone who's not confirmed, they may be right, they may be wrong, or they may be scum..

Maybe, but not when the people you are following are doing nothin bit choosing people at random. If they have a good reason to vote for me, I'm still waiting to hear it.

BabyJesus · Post Post #860 (isolation #41) » Mon Apr 10, 2006 8:22 am

Glork wrote:1) Your mistiming of the TU wagon. You voted him after we had confirmed his role and decided it would probably be better to look elsewhere.
2) Your voting of Shamrock because (this is paraphrased, I'm too lazy to go back adn quote directly) "people who argue WIFOM is scummy bother [you]." When Shamrock was in the group with Doc and Twomz who basically confirmed themselves as Peasant Townies.
3) Your voting of Tamuz today after he had given CES and me the impression that he knows about the nature of Masons and/or recruitability.
4) Your general non-willingness to contribute.

No individual reason is particularly solid. Added up, they make me feel pretty confident that you're a good lynch.

Unvote
Vote: BabyJesus

that's the best you can come up with? Yikes. You're new at this, aren't you?

BabyJesus · Post Post #864 (isolation #42) » Mon Apr 10, 2006 9:38 am

Glork wrote: Let's pummel BabyJesus to death today!

let's not.

BabyJesus · Post Post #867 (isolation #43) » Mon Apr 10, 2006 11:08 am

PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
unvote

vote BJ

Pummel Pummel!

pretty sure you're gonna lose your "best playa" moniker if you run me up...

BabyJesus · Post Post #871 (isolation #44) » Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:37 pm

Thok wrote: On the flip side, I'm pretty sure BJ's a safe lynch; I just think we can do better.

Lynching pro-town players is not "safe".

BabyJesus · Post Post #873 (isolation #45) » Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:45 pm

LoudmouthLee wrote:
Vote: BJ

good stuff here.

baaa

BabyJesus · Post Post #881 (isolation #46) » Mon Apr 10, 2006 11:30 pm

LoudmouthLee wrote:I'll be honest.. I have lost total interest in nthe game. I've been bored with the follow the cop mechanic, definately after a minute of discussion.

This game has involved no logical reasoning whatsoever, so why start now? If the town could stop playing follow the cop, maybe I'll play.

nice to see you decided to follow the masons then...

BabyJesus · Post Post #883 (isolation #47) » Tue Apr 11, 2006 2:31 am

that's a lot of votes on me....

I'd suggest some of you unvote, or at leats try and find a different bandwagon...

BabyJesus · Post Post #894 (isolation #48) » Tue Apr 11, 2006 11:48 am

Twomz wrote:Ah, nm. I forgot about that. Vote stands.

loFl. are you for real?

BabyJesus · Post Post #895 (isolation #49) » Tue Apr 11, 2006 11:49 am

Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Instincts. I don't think he's acting like his usual self. And he's calling other people sheep. I don't have anything concrete on BJ, but that's pretty impossibly anyways. Follow me and prosper!

good stuff here. I can;t understand why I'm not dead yet with this kind of stellar logic.

BabyJesus · Post Post #896 (isolation #50) » Tue Apr 11, 2006 11:50 am

Twomz wrote:Ah, nm. I forgot about that. Vote stands.

Oh, I forgot. baaa....

BabyJesus · Post Post #898 (isolation #51) » Tue Apr 11, 2006 12:27 pm

Twomz wrote: Why shouldn't we follow confirmed townies?

Because you should stop being such a sheep and think for yourself. And I have yet to see a credible reason for voting me, so all you guys are getting is a bunch of "baaaaa's"

BabyJesus · Post Post #901 (isolation #52) » Tue Apr 11, 2006 1:00 pm

Twomz wrote:you're allowing the mafia to hide from the towns view behind your childish behavior.

Are you joking? I had a run on me before I even checked in! I don;t mind a couple votes, it happens. But no one oday has made any effort to find scum. The masons decided I was the vote today, and everyone else fell in line like little baa baa sheep. Nothing to defend against, so go ahead and lynch me.

I noticed out cop chamber joined in like a little sheep as well. Pretty sure he'll be dead tonight.

BabyJesus · Post Post #903 (isolation #53) » Tue Apr 11, 2006 1:06 pm

chamber wrote:
Unvote
Im satisfied for now.

Yea, you had to post this as I was typing, lol

BabyJesus · Post Post #907 (isolation #54) » Tue Apr 11, 2006 3:16 pm

Twomz wrote:BJ, the thing is that there ARE accusations against you.

ces wrote:1) Your mistiming of the TU wagon. You voted him after we had confirmed his role and decided it would probably be better to look elsewhere.
2) Your voting of Shamrock because (this is paraphrased, I'm too lazy to go back adn quote directly) "people who argue WIFOM is scummy bother [you]." When Shamrock was in the group with Doc and Twomz who basically confirmed themselves as Peasant Townies.
3) Your voting of Tamuz today after he had given CES and me the impression that he knows about the nature of Masons and/or recruitability.
4) Your general non-willingness to contribute.
And my accusation that you're acting childish, and being detrimental to the town.

and which one of those "accusations" have ANYTHING to do with being scum? You basically point out everyone I voted.

BabyJesus · Post Post #916 (isolation #55) » Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:46 am

Tamuz wrote:BJ has that effect, he has to be the life of the thread, which chokes most everything else out...

good stuff here. so if I'm not overbearing I get voted off? no reason not to finish me off now then.

BabyJesus · Post Post #918 (isolation #56) » Wed Apr 12, 2006 1:51 pm

Tamuz wrote:The reason of you being town, perchance?

:shrug:

sometimes you gotta break a few eggs.

BabyJesus · Post Post #927 (isolation #57) » Thu Apr 13, 2006 1:08 pm

Hop Shui wrote:

Baby Jesus 8 : (CES, chamber, Twomz, SOS, Glork, Yosarian, Pooky, LML)

Bacde 1: (Y)
Pooky 1: (BabyJesus)
Tamuz 1: (Coron)
Coron 1: (Tamuz)

11 self-confessions to lynch.

good bet there's a couple scum on this train trying to follow the masons for an easy lynch....

BabyJesus · Post Post #929 (isolation #58) » Thu Apr 13, 2006 1:54 pm

Bacde wrote:Which one do
you
think is most likely?

ruling out CES, chamber, and Glork leaves us with
Twomz, SOS, Yosarian, Pooky, LML

Twomz - Originally just followed the masons for no reason then the fact they're masons. Later he quoted some reasons from CES given after the fact, but failed to come up with any of his own. Recently unvoted seemingly out of frustration.

SOS - one line post saying he "trusts the masons on this one" 5 days ago. Has not checked in since.

Yosarian - voted me at least with a reason, saying I am "less aggressive at hunting scum" Claims this is unusual, but has not made any effort from what I can see to tell if previous games I was scum if I acted this way.

Pooky - just joined in for no reasons, later he hopped on SOS, then hopped back on me. I think in just about any game Pooky loves to hop on a BJ bandwagon

LML - one line post voting me, no reason given. Later says he is tired of playing "follow the cop" yet he had no qualms about following along on me, and has failed to make any effort to hunt scum.

Gotta say, after the re-read, my top two are SOS and LML. Leaning Twomz at town. Undecided on Pooky and Yos.

I will

unvote, vote SOS

Reading his posts, I really don't get a warm fuzzy about him being pro-town.

BabyJesus · Post Post #930 (isolation #59) » Thu Apr 13, 2006 1:56 pm

Oh, and for the record, I think chamber should reveal his innocent.

BabyJesus · Post Post #933 (isolation #60) » Thu Apr 13, 2006 3:05 pm

Tamuz wrote:Bacde, mind you scum already has more masons than they can kill... so 1 more confirmed townie will just confuse them even more, I believe.

Not to mention, we certainly don't want to chance him dying with his info....adding to the inocent bloc will only help at this point.

BabyJesus · Post Post #939 (isolation #61) » Fri Apr 14, 2006 12:29 am

SOS wrote:I have checked in and read the thread, but there wasn't much to comment on anyways.

It's funny how BJ acts like a big baby (makes his avatar look better). I have been lurking though, my last course was evolutionary biology and I had long practicals with that and I was totally exhausted after that so I couldn't really follow my mafia games =\.

oh, and hi

some of us expect you to actually comment on your vote....why do you think I am scum...

BabyJesus · Post Post #942 (isolation #62) » Fri Apr 14, 2006 8:32 am

Y wrote:
Twomz wrote:At this point i'm for a lurker lynch.
vote: SOS
He just posted, explaining why he was lurking.

FOS: Twomz.
.

He explained why, but still failed to offer a single bit of constructive commentary other then"babyjesus acts like a baby"

No reason not to finish off SOS at this point.

BabyJesus · Post Post #944 (isolation #63) » Fri Apr 14, 2006 8:39 am

Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:BJ should have been lynched by now, people.

stfu you. We're not lynching BJ. Feel free to make an attempt to find actual scum.

BabyJesus · Post Post #946 (isolation #64) » Fri Apr 14, 2006 8:39 am

chamber wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:Oh, and for the record, I think chamber should reveal his innocent.
I intend to reveal it right before we go to night, or if I think its relevent during the day

fair enough.

BabyJesus · Post Post #950 (isolation #65) » Sat Apr 15, 2006 12:16 am

so, SOS has nothing to offer except personal attacks. nice.

BabyJesus · Post Post #953 (isolation #66) » Sat Apr 15, 2006 5:30 am

Shamrock wrote:
Unvote; Vote BJ

skimmer, we have moved on. I am not the play.

BabyJesus · Post Post #954 (isolation #67) » Sat Apr 15, 2006 5:31 am

Twomz wrote:Lol, that's very ironic BJ.

I have no problem with personal attacks, but if that is ALL you do, that's a problem. Key is to mix it in with some actual content, which is what SOS is failing to do.

BabyJesus · Post Post #964 (isolation #68) » Sat Apr 15, 2006 9:42 am

SOS wrote:
Oh, and for the record, I think chamber should reveal his innocent.
Good stuff here. Isn't there a doc in this game? Isn't chamber fairly safe then? Then why reveal his innocent? If the doc dies, then this is goodposting. But thedocsalive.

Not to mention, we certainly don't want to chance him dying with his info....adding to the inocent bloc will only help at this point
If the town is about to lynch a townie, and chamber knows it, then he should say so. Otherwise I miss the point here.

Do you seriously skim over the part where one of our docs accidentally killed the target? Better safe then sorry.

As for the rest, that's my schtick. If it was your schtick, then it would not be suspicious for you to do it too. But it's not, so when you do it, it's suspicious.

BabyJesus · Post Post #968 (isolation #69) » Sat Apr 15, 2006 12:27 pm

SOS wrote:

so you DID skim over it? nice. Please at least read the mod posts before you pretend to contribute.

BabyJesus · Post Post #970 (isolation #70) » Sat Apr 15, 2006 1:13 pm

Twomz wrote:Arrrggg!!! now i have an extremem urge to vote for BJ again! Why do you people keep doing this to me!!!

I suggest you don't, unless you like voting pro-town players for some reason

BabyJesus · Post Post #973 (isolation #71) » Sat Apr 15, 2006 1:25 pm

Y wrote:You know, BJ, it starts to annoy me that you're insinuating you're town all the time...

insinuating? Please. I haven't been insinuating that at all. I've been saying it straight out.

BabyJesus · Post Post #981 (isolation #72) » Sun Apr 16, 2006 2:27 am

Twomz wrote:So we're all agreed that voting for scummy players is protown and just saying that you're town over and over again is scummy. If that's the case, then it's very protown to vote for BJ... interesting.

How bout this... we lynch SOS today. Then (if we have one) we get the vig to kill BJ tonight. Tomorrow, we'll know where to look (hopefully).

I'm pretty sure i'm already voting for SOS.

vigging me as a bad, bad plan, guy.

BabyJesus · Post Post #988 (isolation #73) » Sun Apr 16, 2006 9:00 am

Twomz wrote:@ Y: I believe there was a Spanish only mafia game recently... but i haven't seen anything about it in a while, so i'm not sure if they actually started it or not.

@ BJ: Is there a specific reason why it's bad? Right now, at least it looks like by vigging you, we at least save us a day of useless arguing. At most we'll bad a scumbag.

yes

BabyJesus · Post Post #990 (isolation #74) » Sun Apr 16, 2006 10:22 am

Coron wrote:Because he's protown obv.

:goodposting:

BabyJesus · Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:49 am

so....

BabyJesus · Post Post #1007 (isolation #76) » Wed Apr 19, 2006 8:47 am

Shamrock wrote:While I'd still prefer a Y lynch, I think BJ is a better choice than SOS.

and you'd be wrong. But protecting SOS is noted.

BabyJesus · Post Post #1022 (isolation #77) » Wed Apr 19, 2006 3:12 pm

mystery meat of doom wrote:Has he even been on?

I'm Asian and I'd like to say I have a profound hatred (not really) of ipods and mp3s players.

gotta call BS on this one

BabyJesus · Post Post #1028 (isolation #78) » Wed Apr 19, 2006 3:58 pm

chamber wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
mystery meat of doom wrote:Has he even been on?

I'm Asian and I'd like to say I have a profound hatred (not really) of ipods and mp3s players.
gotta call BS on this one
He is asian, and I've never seen him with an ipod, he could be telling the truth...

pretty sure he's doing it when you're not looking then.

BabyJesus · Post Post #1035 (isolation #79) » Fri Apr 21, 2006 1:32 am

good times

BabyJesus · Fri Apr 21, 2006 11:34 am

BabyJesus · Post Post #1059 (isolation #81) » Fri Apr 28, 2006 7:12 am

BabyJesus wrote:
Shamrock wrote:While I'd still prefer a Y lynch, I think BJ is a better choice than SOS.
and you'd be wrong. But protecting SOS is noted.

today we

vote Shamrock

BabyJesus · Fri Apr 28, 2006 12:04 pm

Glork wrote:
Twomz wrote:(No, there is no mention of a job in my role, i'm assuming i'm some sort of farmer or factory worker, probably extremely poor).
That's all I wanted to hear.

Anyway, I'd be okay with a Y lynch.
I'm still unsure about a Shamrock lynch -- wasn't he the other person who
confirmed
CLAIMED Peasantness with Twomz and thedocisalive?

fixed

BabyJesus · Post Post #1073 (isolation #83) » Fri Apr 28, 2006 2:39 pm

Shamrock wrote:
Glork wrote:Hmm, interesting. Shamrock -- did you have any flavor beyond being a "Peasant"?
No.

Again, I'm not willing to reveal in what manner my role was changed just yet.

no worries, we'll see it after we lynch you.

BabyJesus · Post Post #1090 (isolation #84) » Sat Apr 29, 2006 2:55 pm

Shamrock wrote:On night 2, I was targetted for recruitment by one of the Red Guard groups. I was given the option of accepting or declining. I declined, but I was called a fool and forced to join anyway.

However, apparently declining affected what happened as a result.
I am a Red Guard, but I still win with the town. No, I do not know who the other Red Guards are (obviously, I did not know SOS was a Red Guard), and I do not know for sure whether I am a Yunan or Elite.

However, thinking about this with the new information we have now...

If we assume that the Yunan guards kill on odd nights and recruit on even nights, and vice versa for the Elites, that would mean I was recruited by the Yunans and SOS was my recruiter. This is, of course, all hypothetical as we don't know for sure that that's the case (and it also doesn't account for the N1 kill, which isn't specified as being done by Yunans or Elites).

By the way, there's a special mechanic for how the Red Guards work. Every night, I submit someone I want to see die (and I assume all the other Red Guards do this as well). The leader of the Red Guard gets to choose between these submissions for a kill. I was asked for a submission by the mod on night 3, but I didn't send one. I was not, however, asked for a submission on night 4, which would seem to conform with our theory on Yunans recruiting on evens/killing on odds.

I believe there may be another player in the same situation as me (ie. declined a recruit from a Red Guard) due to something he/she said, but I won't call them out on it at this time.

if you declined, why is it you still submit names....

pretty sure we need to lynch him...

BabyJesus · Post Post #1093 (isolation #85) » Sat Apr 29, 2006 3:04 pm

Thok wrote: That said, I'd rather hunt the Elite Guard recruiter rather than a Red Guard recruit today-Y's more likely to be such a recruiter.

that's stupid.

BabyJesus · Post Post #1109 (isolation #86) » Mon May 01, 2006 6:46 am

why is shamrock not dead yet....

BabyJesus · Tue May 02, 2006 12:46 pm

I would like to hear chamber's result....

BabyJesus · Post Post #1124 (isolation #88) » Tue May 02, 2006 1:12 pm

chamber wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:I would like to hear chamber's result....
it's not guilty and has no relevence to the current discussion, I'll reveal it later in the day like yesterday.

then I will be voting the red guard Shamrock all day most likely.

BabyJesus · Wed May 03, 2006 12:41 am

may as well lynch Shamrock now to test Bacde then....or we could do it the other way around, in case Bacde is the recruiter....
in fact, I like that better....

unvote, vote Bacde

BabyJesus · Post Post #1137 (isolation #90) » Wed May 03, 2006 4:28 am

chamber wrote:I have an innocent on bacde.

interesting....

unvote

BabyJesus · Post Post #1138 (isolation #91) » Wed May 03, 2006 4:30 am

vote Y

let's see where this leads us....

BabyJesus · Post Post #1148 (isolation #92) » Wed May 03, 2006 7:54 am

chamber has probably been recruited at this point....

BabyJesus · Post Post #1207 (isolation #93) » Mon May 08, 2006 7:00 am

chamber wrote:I'd be more then willing to glork. At night I can torture someone to find out about them.

is that all you have?

BabyJesus · Mon May 08, 2006 12:48 pm

unvote, vote Pooky

pretty sure she is scum.

BabyJesus · Post Post #1238 (isolation #95) » Fri May 12, 2006 2:39 am

Y wrote:Okay. What exactly in my D1 actions made me suspicious? Except for you trying to get even with me.

2 away and no claim??

unvote, vote Y

BabyJesus · Post Post #1247 (isolation #96) » Fri May 12, 2006 9:31 am

confirm vote Y

BabyJesus · Post Post #1254 (isolation #97) » Fri May 12, 2006 1:31 pm

Yosarian2 wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
confirm vote Y
Heh...is this your "always lynch the doc" metagame thingy?

pretty much

BabyJesus · Post Post #1267 (isolation #98) » Wed May 17, 2006 3:58 am

Hop Shui wrote:Everyone assembles at Red Square for a state funeral!

Oh, yes,
Glork
, aka
Ding Chen, Chen Mason Group
died of complications from dysentery. First he was given useless medication, then he was given the wrong medication... when the Maoists came for him... it was too late.

Sixteen left... nine kicks to the head to knock out permanently!

Useless medication. Nice. So we have two barefoot doctors, I guess one whose 's medication is sometimes useless, and one who's is sometimes wrong/fatal?

Also, nice to see my "always lynch the doc" policy paid off!

BabyJesus · Post Post #1275 (isolation #99) » Wed May 17, 2006 2:16 pm

Yosarian2 wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
Hop Shui wrote:Everyone assembles at Red Square for a state funeral!

Oh, yes,
Glork
, aka
Ding Chen, Chen Mason Group
died of complications from dysentery. First he was given useless medication, then he was given the wrong medication... when the Maoists came for him... it was too late.

Sixteen left... nine kicks to the head to knock out permanently!
Useless medication. Nice. So we have two barefoot doctors, I guess one whose 's medication is sometimes useless, and one who's is sometimes wrong/fatal?
Could be. Could be we have a doc with a chance of lethal failure, or two docs with different possible results. I think my earlier speculation about having one insane doc is probably wrong; if a doc was completly insane (in other words, basically a vig), he would know it by know, and I doubt he would target Glork, unless he's some kind of odd bad guy role.

Well, it's pretty clear he had both useless AND wrong medication, and we saw last time someone died it was a barefoot doc...probably 2 barefoot doc's out there, one with useless or sometimes useless medicine, and one that sometimes kills....

BabyJesus · Thu May 18, 2006 3:47 pm

if it helps, I was never recruited....that should narrow it down.

BabyJesus · Fri May 19, 2006 3:42 am

vote chamber

pretty sure he's recruited

BabyJesus · Fri May 19, 2006 2:31 pm

unvote, vote viper0933

BabyJesus · Fri May 19, 2006 3:13 pm

viper0933 wrote:You never seem to post reasons, do you?

pretty sure you're scum....

BabyJesus · Sun May 21, 2006 12:22 am

RIP Viper.

BabyJesus · Sun May 21, 2006 5:03 am

viper0933 wrote:So, no evidence is a sufficient case.

I'd suggest you doublecheck your PM. Pretty sure it says you're scum.

BabyJesus · Sun May 21, 2006 6:56 am

viper0933 wrote:No, it says I'm a doctor.

O RLY?

BabyJesus · Sun May 21, 2006 6:56 am

So are you a barefoot doctor that kills, the one thats useless, or another kind of doc...

either way,

confirm vote viper

BabyJesus · Sun May 21, 2006 7:18 am

viper0933 wrote:
FOS: Bacde

See a trend here?

It's called "Hey! Let's lynch Viper0933 with absolutely no evidence!"

claimed docs need to be lynched.

You didn;t either bother to answer my post. Are you one of docs that either kills or is useless?

BabyJesus · Sun May 21, 2006 9:29 am

viper0933 wrote:Ok, so basically, even if the person is telling the truth, a claimed doc has to go? I understand that, but I noticed I got no-reasoned votes WAY before that. And BJ started all that.

So you are climing to be the doc that kills people? Are you a barefoot doc, or some other kind of doc? I believe you, but you still need to go....we can't have a "doc" running around willy nilly giving people bad medicine....

BabyJesus · Sun May 21, 2006 10:14 am

viper0933 wrote:Just because I'm a doc doesn't mean I "kill" or something, I might just have a 50% chance of protecting that person sufficiently or something.

Are you a "barefoot doc"?

BabyJesus · Sun May 21, 2006 2:29 pm

viper0933 wrote:Well, I claimed, yet you still think I'm scum. What's the point of claiming if you get lynched anyway?

did you answer the question?

BabyJesus · Sun May 21, 2006 2:42 pm

viper0933 wrote:Yes. I answered with ":shock:" which means yes.

why is that a shock....

BabyJesus · Sun May 21, 2006 3:44 pm

viper0933 wrote:Because it was a yes.

So why not say yes? What was so shocking about the question?

BabyJesus · Mon May 22, 2006 12:50 am

unvote

Way I see it, our barefoot doc that is killing isn't really a "doc" at all - we need to think about him as a vig.

He's claimed a role we KNOW is in the game. If he really ISN'T who he says he is, the REAL killing barefoot doc should simply target vip over and over until he dies.

That said, if he IS the real killer, he needs to stop targeting people to protect them, and start targeting people to kill them....in ohter words, not masons!

BabyJesus · Mon May 22, 2006 1:45 am

viper0933 wrote:I guess my preceder didn't target night 4 due to that day being a likely killing night. That's why I said "kill" instead of protect.

@BJ: it shocked me because I never noticed it before. I thought it just said doctor

can you tell me some of the flavor behind being a "barefoot doc"?

BabyJesus · Mon May 22, 2006 7:30 am

Twomz wrote:I'm leaving my vote on. I have a policy of not trusting X/Vig roles. But, we can test it if the town feels like that's the best plan.

so you doubt the existence of a barefoot doc that actually kills?

BabyJesus · Mon May 22, 2006 8:00 am

Twomz wrote:In my experience when someone claims X/vig, it's a mafioso trying to claim a power role (usually Doc or Cop) and cites Vig to cover the fact that if they get tracked at night and their target dies, they can just say that they were vigging them.

(Puzzle in DA Mafia on MTGSalvation (Cop/vig) and Nightfall in Mafia 50 recently on Mafiascum (Doc/vig))

Let me rephrase.

so you doubt the existence of a barefoot doc that actually kills?

This is a yes or no answer.

BabyJesus · Mon May 22, 2006 8:11 am

Twomz wrote:First, can you give a specific definition of "barefoot doc"?

ok, that's all I need to hear. You're not paying attention.

BabyJesus · Mon May 22, 2006 8:15 am

Hop Shui wrote:You'd think everyone would sleep tight after such a violent class struggle, but it seems that quite a few people were up.

We awoke to find the cold, stiff body of thedocsalive, with a bizarre bluish hue. Upon investigation, we found that the night before, thedocsalive complained of a slight fever, and
was seen by a barefoot doctor
. Real doctors were intellectuals and were pleagued by severe class problems that often resulted in their being emprisoned or sent down for harsh manual labor on the countryside.
Barefoot doctors
, being politically pure peasants give a few months of training in hygiene but mostly indoctrination with Mao Zedong Thought as a healing principle, were to replace them.
This barefoot doctor misdiagnosed thedocsalive's fever, gave the wrong medicine, and the patient died. The patient was but a poor peasant
.

RIP the docsalive, Peasant.
Working tirelessly for the "People."

BabyJesus · Mon May 22, 2006 1:57 pm

Tamuz wrote:Did viper actually claim to be the barefoot doctor.

I thought he just said doctor and BJ was the one to jump to the idea of him being a barefoot doctor. I have no idea what that would say. but if my memory serves to be correct we do need to rethink...

I asked if he was....

BabyJesus · Mon May 22, 2006 4:12 pm

vote Pooky

forgot about him. He's scum.

BabyJesus · Tue May 23, 2006 7:36 am

Zindaras wrote:What have I done?

Well, that's 57 pages to read.

go ahead and vote Pooky while you're reading...

BabyJesus · Thu May 25, 2006 2:12 am

VisMaior wrote:BJ really kicks my scumdar high. He accuses viper of beeing antitown, then throws in the barefoot doc thing and acts as if viper was completely cleared. I think the barefoot doc, who always kills innocents, could easily be a flavor for a killing role.

FOS BJ

I disagree.

BabyJesus · Thu May 25, 2006 8:12 am

Yosarian2 wrote:
VisMaior wrote:I think the barefoot doc, who always kills innocents, could easily be a flavor for a killing role.

FOS BJ
Tthe barefoot doc probably isn't a standard scum-killing role, I think, because we've only had a barefoot doc kill twice so far this game. Does not prove that that the barefoot doc is not some kind of anti-town role, but I doubt it's just "flavor for a killing role".

Not to mention, if you read the writeups, we had one doc give "useless medicine" and one doc give "wrong medicine". We've probably got at leat two barefoot doc's, if not more.

BabyJesus · Sat May 27, 2006 3:15 am

We should focus on finishing off Pooky right now...

BabyJesus · Mon May 29, 2006 1:37 am

VisMaior wrote:*kicks thread* Comeon people, we need to nail some scum here!

unvote, vote vismaior

BabyJesus · Mon May 29, 2006 10:35 am

viper0933 wrote:
Confirm Vote: BabyJesus

wow, you really are dense, aren't you. Or stupid.

BabyJesus · Mon May 29, 2006 12:03 pm

viper0933 wrote:That means that you suspect that person more, even though you're already voting for him/her.

or, in your case, makes you look like an idiot.

BabyJesus · Mon May 29, 2006 1:29 pm

viper0933 wrote:I'm trying to get BabyJesus to get information out, but all he's doing is trying his best (or is he?) to get me to stop. Is that retarded or what? He definatly has a problem.

So what prompted your "confirm vote"?

BabyJesus · Mon May 29, 2006 2:45 pm

viper0933 wrote:Your lack of reasoning. Plus the post you quoted.

Now I regret using my "lack of reasoning" to try and help clear you.

unvote, vote viper

Such stupidity in the hands of a vig is more detrimental to the town if we leave you alive. You are a liability, and need to die.

BabyJesus · Mon May 29, 2006 3:39 pm

viper0933 wrote:And plus, you said that even though you believed my claim, I still had to die. You tried to clear me?!

I said that now, that you have shown your irresponsibility. Have you even read my posts the past few days? I WAS defending you. No more.

And you are not a f'ing doc, you need to think of yourself as a VIG. Well, no need because we're going to lynch you so you don't go willy nilly killing people you shouldn;t be.

BabyJesus · Tue May 30, 2006 2:08 pm

unvote, vote Coron

BabyJesus · Wed May 31, 2006 4:16 am

viper0933 wrote:That's probably doctor protection or something. But even though his posts lately have gotton weird, I'm not going to vote for him, just because the wagon went on too fast.

well, you are wasting your vote on me....I suggest moving it to Coron.

BabyJesus · Wed May 31, 2006 3:34 pm

AbbeyGargoyle wrote:
Yosarian2 wrote: Lynching stupid townies is a bad stratagy, but lynching a stupid vig is not always one. I'd rather he just agree to be more careful, but if he dosn't agree to stop killing masons, then lynching him might be necessary.
Agreed as a stupid vig is little more than an SK who wins with the town instead of just himself. I'm going to go over the thread again before I put my vote somewhere, but right now BJ's MO doesn't sit well with me.

huh? I'm not the stupid vig you nitwit.

BabyJesus · Wed May 31, 2006 3:35 pm

viper0933 wrote:@Yosarian: It's just to get him to post something we can use instead of useless jabber.

You realize that's not the purpose of votes, right? Why don;t you go ahead and put a vote on scumCoron. tia.

BabyJesus · Thu Jun 01, 2006 5:28 am

Machiavellian-Mafia wrote:also do not see coron as scum and the rapid growth of that wagon was alarming,

3 votes is "rapid, alarming growth"? Please.

BabyJesus · Thu Jun 01, 2006 1:45 pm

Coron wrote:it is, not to mention if I recall it was 4.

still not alarming.

BabyJesus · Thu Jun 01, 2006 2:41 pm

Machiavellian-Mafia wrote:I don't think viper is the lynch today since he probably realizes now that he is a vig, he can actually help the town by giving bad or useless medicine to who he thinks is scum. I also do not see coron as scum and the rapid growth of that wagon was alarming, theres probably some scum on that wagon. I still think chamber was recruited and is just throwing out fake investigations, so my vote stands.

Viper does not give uselss medicine. From how he describes it, He either succeeds in protecting, or he kills.

BabyJesus · Tue Jun 06, 2006 4:17 am

vote Pooky

wouldn't mind lynching chamber either, I find it hard to believe neither side recruited him, as early as he came out.

BabyJesus · Tue Jun 06, 2006 4:35 am

chamber wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
vote Pooky

wouldn't mind lynching chamber either, I find it hard to believe neither side recruited him, as early as he came out.
Thats what they want you to think!!

maybe. Let's just lynch Pooky.

BabyJesus · Tue Jun 06, 2006 4:35 am

chamber wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
vote Pooky

wouldn't mind lynching chamber either, I find it hard to believe neither side recruited him, as early as he came out.
Thats what they want you to think!!

who did you investigate btw....

BabyJesus · Thu Jun 08, 2006 4:11 pm

chamber wrote:
Yosarian2 wrote:
chamber wrote: Also the only reason you have to doubt me that I see, is that Id be a good cult recruit, but that’s complete wifom.
Well, I'm not sure if it really is a WIFOM issue. You were clearly a threat to the cult, as soon as you got Fritzer lynched that was made clear. If they couldn't kill you because of doc protection or whatever, and if they could recruit you, I would expect them to try, to neutralize the threat you posed to them if nothing else.

Now, that dosn't mean you have been recruited, but you must admit you'd be a very logical target.
but because im such an appealing target the town would of course lynch me assuming i was recruited so why recruit me (see wifom)

I'm tempted just to vote you for using "wifom" as a defense. That's weak, weak, weak. You can't dismiss arguments you don;t like by saying that.

BabyJesus · Fri Jun 09, 2006 4:53 am

unvote, vote chamber

BabyJesus · Fri Jun 09, 2006 9:13 am

chamber wrote:
Machiavellian-Mafia wrote:chamber with the deadline so close now and you having some votes, you probably need to go with the consensus here and reveal your results.
I'm a site full person you see, and at this point would rather take them to the grave.

@coron You're right, getting the town to lynch me is strictly better.

Is there a chamber-to-English dictionary somewhere so i can look up WTF a site full person is?

BabyJesus · Fri Jun 09, 2006 10:33 am

chamber wrote:
VisMaior wrote:Yea. bu t I dont get why you dont want to spill?
As I said Im spiteful. If you are going to lynch me because of a THEORY then I'm not helping you, I'd rather lose.

actually, we're lynching you so we can be certain about all the people you've "cleared" But your reluctance to give a view really puzzles me, and makes me think you really were recruited, and are cutting your losses to not give out more info to the town.

Is there a list handy of everyone cleared by chamber just in case he IS still clean?

BabyJesus · Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:33 pm

chamber wrote:
Yosarian2 wrote:
Chamber wrote:Back it with behavioral evidence if you want to suggest I’m not town
Well, I have some now.

chamber wrote: You're lynching me before you force me to reveal anything.
That's not the way a real pro-town cop would, or at least should, ever act.

vote:chamber
I act how I act. The role I get is usually a very limited factor in how I act, and I never give in to pressure.

@bj lynching me to confirm who i've cleared is stupid. Of the two you know of, pooky could have been recrutied since then, so you're lynching me to clear 1 person, nice.

plus your view from today....

BabyJesus · Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:34 pm

and already distancing yourself from your pooky view is noted...

BabyJesus · Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:34 pm

Chamber, can you breakdown your views by night again for us?

BabyJesus · Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:50 pm

hmm

unvote, vote yosarian

BabyJesus · Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:16 pm

PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
VOTE BJ

can we lynch him now plz?

is there some reason for this?

BabyJesus · Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:28 am

let's just lynch yosarian. I don;t like a chamber or a pooky vote just yet.

BabyJesus · Wed Jun 14, 2006 6:22 am

VisMaior wrote:hm. Im liking a pooky or chamber lynch better as the yosarian one.

fos

BabyJesus · Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:32 am

VisMaior wrote:I dont get it. Pooky can be confirmed or condemned by tomorrow (except if his partner is recruited as well). Why the hassle to lynch him? He is an outed mason anyway, so he will most liely die sooner or later, if he is not scum. So either we gain a confirmed innocent, or if not, then either he is scum, or he is dead by tomorrow. What is the point of lynching him right now?

this is why I said I didn't like his lynch anymore (plus I had forgotten there was an innocent investigation on him at one point)

Also, why did MM say he would not be able to post before the deadline, yet not bother to lay down a vote. This troubles me.

unvote, vote Machiavellian-Mafia

BabyJesus · Tue Jun 20, 2006 6:15 am

well, I f'd up unvoting there.... surprised I'm not being speed-lynched

Glad I was right on Yosarian though.

Top 2 suspects right now are AbbeyGargoyle and MM.

vote AbbeyGargoyle

Bacde and Vaughn are the only two I consider cleared right now. Shamrock does fall into that category.

Shamrock, are you still submitting names? Who did you submit last night? If we don;t lynch you, I think we need to hear who you are submitting before we go to night.

BabyJesus · Tue Jun 20, 2006 1:18 pm

Machiavellian-Mafia wrote:I just had the idea, what are our prospects of mass claiming at this point? I can see the downside of letting scum know about everyone's roles and I can see the upside of spotting whos lying based on information, the flavor, etc.

discuss.

pretty sure you're scum

BabyJesus · Thu Jun 22, 2006 9:47 am

Bacde wrote:Well damn. At least I'm cleared innocent. But I still feel like a fool for role reasons.

??

BabyJesus · Thu Jun 22, 2006 9:48 am

no reason not to finish off AbbeyGargoyle at this point

BabyJesus · Sat Jun 24, 2006 2:56 am

AbbeyGargoyle wrote:
Twomz wrote:Wow... you lurk all day, then come out and OMGUS one of the people voting you w/o even posting a real comment... way to contribute there Abbey...
I'm just sick of BJ's style this entire game. I know that OMGUS are usually not looked upon favorably, but I really don't like his style.

lol @ the lurker criticizing me. I suggest this late in the game voting for who you think is scum, not people who's style you dislike.

BabyJesus · Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:35 am

Coron wrote:
unvote
yeah a claim.

fos

no reason not to finish off abbey at this point

BabyJesus · Wed Jun 28, 2006 5:11 am

AbbeyGargoyle wrote:You are 30 yr-old Haifeng Li. I cannot be recruited by the Red Guards and I am a mason with someone still alive who shall remain nameless for now.

who is your mason buddy....

BabyJesus · Wed Jun 28, 2006 12:42 pm

Machiavellian-Mafia wrote:I'll be going on vacation from june 29th ~ july 9th with very little possibility of internet access.

unvote, vote mm

may as well finish this guy off

BabyJesus · Wed Jul 05, 2006 7:59 am

MM should claim next, imho.

BabyJesus · Fri Jul 21, 2006 2:16 am

VisMaior wrote:People still alive need to speak up. Prods perhaps?

A quick recap of yesterday:
So the people left that haven't claimed are BJ, MM, and Coron. And the claims are Me, Bacde, and Shamrock, Townies; and Vaughn and Abbey masons.
4. Twomz -claimed townie
6. Coron
9. BabyJesus

3. Vaughn -cleared
7. feuerdrache/AbbeyGargoyle -cleared
5. Shamrock -cleared?

If we agree that the bottom 3 are cleared, the last remaining scum should be in the top 3 (and me, but Im not it ). Do we push the massclaim trough? Altough the last scum is probably a recruit too...

I'm not sure anyone is 100% cleared.... Those bottom 3 all claimed mason, yes?

BabyJesus · Fri Jul 21, 2006 2:32 pm

vote coron

BabyJesus · Mon Jul 24, 2006 4:01 am

Coron wrote:Could we have you not do that?

why not?

BabyJesus · Tue Jul 25, 2006 6:36 am

pretty happy with a coron lynch at this point.

BabyJesus · Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:23 pm

AbbeyGargoyle wrote:
Twomz wrote:I don't see why bj needs to claim right now, if coron's scum it's pointless, and if bj is scum one more night to make a fake claim won't do him much good. Besides, I don't really get much of a scum vibe from bj.
What potential harm could you see it doing though?

am I the only one who hasn;t claimed? If so, then it is obvious if you've been paying attention what my role is.

BabyJesus · Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:47 pm

VisMaior wrote:Spell it out for me, Im dense.

no

BabyJesus · Tue Aug 01, 2006 1:51 am

why is coron not yet dead?

BabyJesus · Sat Aug 05, 2006 2:47 am

Can someone sum up all the claims again?

BabyJesus · Mon Aug 07, 2006 2:15 am

VisMaior wrote:Im for the claims too.

so why haven;t you claimed?

BabyJesus · Tue Aug 08, 2006 4:47 am

VisMaior wrote:Meh. I claim Mason with Glork and CES. BJ should be Guo mason, if Im not mistaken.

no...

BabyJesus · Tue Aug 08, 2006 5:02 am

Hop Shui wrote:Everyone assembles at Red Square for a state funeral!

Wail for
Thok
, the courageous
Marshall Peng Dehuai
whose stand against Mao's policies during the Great Leap Forward earned him to spend the rest of his life in disgrace. What a great, principled, brave man we have lost! A devoted Maoist found his hiding place, and executed him.

Oh, yes,
Glork
, aka
Ding Chen, Chen Mason Group
died of complications from dysentery.
First he was given useless medication
, then he was given the wrong medication... when the Maoists came for him... it was too late.

Sixteen left... nine kicks to the head to knock out permanently!

may as well claim now, since I'll probably get lynched if I don't....

That's me here. I'm the other barefoot doc...except rather then killing when the medicine doesn't work, it does nothing...

BabyJesus · Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:47 am

I don;t know wtf is going on here with all these "mason" groups.

BabyJesus · Mon Aug 14, 2006 11:39 am

Why don;t we put one vote on everyone BUT me. Guaranteed town win

BabyJesus · Tue Aug 15, 2006 3:49 am

unvote, vote twomz

BabyJesus · Tue Aug 15, 2006 7:32 am

Twomz wrote:Sry BJ, you missed the deadline by about an hour I think.

I know

BabyJesus · Tue Aug 29, 2006 7:47 am

lol. Nice job lynching the guy the mod confirmed had a pro-town role. dumbasses.