nintendoaddict1 wrote:Heh, what unrelated reasons would those be, hm?
Glad you asked.
In iso 9, you agree with ani's reason for thinking Furry's scum, thereby implying you think ani's town (or if not, why would you have posted it?); in iso 13, you call the ani-Furry interaction distancing, implying you think ani's scum. There are fourteen minutes in between these two posts. Remember that number, it'll be important later.
Isos 28-32 and 34: you try to attack Seraphim for a "slip" that isn't a slip at all. (If I thought English wasn't your first language, I
might
let this slide, but you're from Ontario, which is in the English-speaking part of Canada IIRC.)
Iso 38: "I'm one of the 20 out of 100 people who are town when they do this, really!" Does this one really need explanation?
Isos 47-49: Remember the "slip" you were attacking Seraphim for earlier? Now you're claiming he changed his opinion over
seventeen
minutes and is therefore scummy. You made a much larger change in opinion over
fourteen
minutes (see above), so you have negative room to call Sera scummy for that unless you want to admit that you too are scummy.
Those are the big things that spring to mind; there are probably a few more little things that factor in as well.
Response to things after post 442 coming tomorrow.
Discretion is the better part of valor.
If I helped lynch you, you deserved it.
Retired from playing for the foreseeable future.