Any Band U-Pick (Town Wins)

CryMeARiver · Post Post #750 (ISO) » Mon Jul 18, 2011 8:43 am

Nikanor wrote:
CMAR wrote:I'm not assuming Power is town, I'm assuming you're scum and you know who Pine targetted. You've been awful forceful on the Power lynch and that scares me as I think Power could have easily been a Bookie target as well.

I doubt that Power was bookied.

CMAR wrote:Also, why are you forcing the quick lynch? We have plenty of time and just about no discussion today.

There has been almost no discussion because I'm pretty much the only one doing anything. As you can see from the massprod, we're not using the time we have to discuss anything.
Do you think that Power is scum or do you think that he is town?

I think his actions have been scummy, but I think he is town as he has not defended as hard as maf would and there's no way I'm claiming VT if I'm maf at that point.

Why the doubt?

Nikanor · Post Post #751 (ISO) » Mon Jul 18, 2011 9:04 am

CMAR wrote:I think his actions have been scummy, but I think he is town as he has not defended as hard as maf would and there's no way I'm claiming VT if I'm maf at that point.

Why the doubt?

a) This is a terrible reason for thinking that someone is town. The amount that someone defends himself is just a playstyle tell, not an alignment tell.
b) We both know that fakeclaiming VT is terrible, but that doesn't stop dozens of scum from doing that every day.
c) I was the only one who expressed suspicion of Powerrox d1. Unless the scum thought (for whatever reason) that I would rally the troops and get Powerrox lynched instead of Parabollocks, Powerrox would not have been bookied.

nintendoaddict1 · Post Post #752 (ISO) » Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:06 am

CryMeARiver wrote:I think his actions have been scummy, but I think he is town as he has not defended as hard as maf would and there's no way I'm claiming VT if I'm maf at that point.

Why the doubt?

Normally, when someone doesn't defend themselves well enough, they are called scum. You are saying, that because he hasn't been defending himself too much, he is town?

Oh yeah, VT is pretty much the most common scumclaim, so that's moot.

Groundsel · Post Post #753 (ISO) » Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:10 am

nintendoaddict1 wrote:
Oh yeah, VT is pretty much the most common scumclaim, so that's moot.

it's also the most common townclaim too, so your point is also moot

In fact I don't like this logic at all.

Fos nintendo

If I lose to nintendo scum, I will never forgive you guys

and whilst I'm here, I must admit I'm thinking along the same lines as gorilla. Powerox just seems like stubborn town. Ant is a safer bet imho

VOTE: ant

nintendoaddict1 · Post Post #754 (ISO) » Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:12 am

Groundsel wrote:
nintendoaddict1 wrote:
Oh yeah, VT is pretty much the most common scumclaim, so that's moot.

it's also the most common townclaim too, so your point is also moot

In fact I don't like this logic at all.
Fos nintendo

If I lose to nintendo scum, I will never forgive you guys

and whilst I'm here, I must admit I'm thinking along the same lines as gorilla. Powerox just seems like stubborn town. Ant is a safer bet imho

VOTE: ant

I was not making my own point, just talking about his.

Seraphim · Post Post #755 (ISO) » Mon Jul 18, 2011 3:36 pm

Mod: V/LA has come up. I will be gone from July 19th to July 23rd. Sorry if this is inconvenient.

I am keeping my vote where it is, sorry.

Powerrox93 · Post Post #756 (ISO) » Mon Jul 18, 2011 6:45 pm

@Mod: V/LA July 29-31. More towards LA.

nintendoaddict1 wrote:Oh yeah, VT is pretty much the most common scumclaim, so that's moot.

But if you're a VT, then what's the point in claiming something else?

nintendoaddict1 · Post Post #757 (ISO) » Mon Jul 18, 2011 8:57 pm

Powerrox93 wrote:
@Mod: V/LA July 29-31. More towards LA.

nintendoaddict1 wrote:Oh yeah, VT is pretty much the most common scumclaim, so that's moot.
But if you're a VT, then what's the point in claiming something else?

That's where the wine comes in.

AntB · Post Post #758 (ISO) » Tue Jul 19, 2011 2:18 am

Well I seem to be the current counterwagon, and no one is providing many reasons. I provided reasoning for all my votes. Gorrilla has pulled a half case on me at best.

Trumpet of Doom · Post Post #759 (ISO) » Tue Jul 19, 2011 1:03 pm

Back. If there's anything people want me to respond to, now's the time to point it out.

diddin · Post Post #760 (ISO) » Tue Jul 19, 2011 2:31 pm

What do you think of the growing AntB wagon?

gorilla · Post Post #761 (ISO) » Tue Jul 19, 2011 2:40 pm

at this stage I basically think I'm waiting for AntB to save his scum hide by hammering powerrox. Disappointed he must keep us waiting so.

DemonHybrid · Post Post #762 (ISO) » Tue Jul 19, 2011 4:33 pm

Okay, I'm back.

I'm going to read up and post tomorrow.

Juls · Post Post #763 (ISO) » Tue Jul 19, 2011 5:00 pm

vote: powerox

Gaoth · Post Post #764 (ISO) » Tue Jul 19, 2011 5:01 pm

@ Antb

AntB wrote:
Gorilla wrote:
explanation for antb: your day 1 was as follows

¹opportunistic vote on juls for faking a day action

²opportunistic switch to nintendo

followed by another ²opportunistic hop to epm
and that's about it

³considering epm flipped town and the other two are very likely town, this reflects poorly on you

¹Really? How was voting on a non-wagon oppotunistic? I acted on my read at the time.
²Understandable how you can see that. I provided my reasons at the time.
³My vote isn't the only one which can be read as opportunistic on that wagon.

¹Interesting. You criticised EPM for jumping onto a "wagon" with one other vote, calling it scummy.
₂I see no reasons. In fact, your "reason" for voting Nintendo was something another player did. Also, your vote on EPM follows a quote. Thats it. Not sure I see a case there.
₃ This is deflecting and borders on WIFOM.

VOTE: AntB

DemonHybrid · Post Post #765 (ISO) » Tue Jul 19, 2011 5:03 pm

Actually, what's the argument against a Powerrox lynch?

Please link posts, and summarize points. I'm deciding on whether the lynch is awesome or if people are just giving him no wiggle room to explain himself.

Slaxx · Post Post #766 (ISO) » Tue Jul 19, 2011 5:04 pm

That was hammer. Flip+Flavor in 24 hours.

Slaxx · Post Post #767 (ISO) » Tue Jul 19, 2011 5:18 pm

Okay so it has come to my attention that it was not hammer.

I need to stop checking thread in between guild wars runs.

I apologize for failing.

Carry on my wayward sons.

nintendoaddict1 · Post Post #768 (ISO) » Tue Jul 19, 2011 5:18 pm

Slaxx wrote:

Carry on my wayward sons.

There'll be peace you are done.

nintendoaddict1 · Post Post #769 (ISO) » Tue Jul 19, 2011 5:26 pm

Juls wrote:
vote: powerox

Sheeping onto a wagon to put it at L-1 without a reason gets you a

Unvote, Vote: Juls

Juls · Post Post #770 (ISO) » Tue Jul 19, 2011 6:24 pm

Read my iso. I suspected him as scum yesterday plus said my vote was on him in spirit but I wasn't going to vote him before going v la for the weekend. How is that a sheep exactly?

Juls · Post Post #771 (ISO) » Tue Jul 19, 2011 6:27 pm

Also wtf you hypocrite. You put him at L-1 last page!!!!

Powerrox93 · Post Post #772 (ISO) » Tue Jul 19, 2011 6:40 pm

Juls wrote:Also wtf you hypocrite. You put him at L-1 last page!!!!

This so much

UNVOTE: (In case I was voting)
VOTE: Nintendo

Scummy self-contradiction is scummy

nintendoaddict1 · Post Post #773 (ISO) » Tue Jul 19, 2011 6:44 pm

Juls wrote:Also wtf you hypocrite. You put him at L-1 last page!!!!

Fair enough.

But basically we are suspecting each other for the same reason.

Also, if I'm such a hypocrite, then why did you not vote for me just now?

Of course, if you vote for me now, you'd look scummy cause I had to remind you.

Bowser · Post Post #774 (ISO) » Tue Jul 19, 2011 6:46 pm

Powerrox's vote is shit.