cavjj wrote:
Didn’t like this. Didn’t like this at all. The point of the game, from a town point of view is to search for scum. We will all suspect townies throughout the course of the game, but those players should be convinced of your alleged PT role and dissuaded from the lynch via argument, not just “You must be scum because I say I’m town and you’re still suspecting me"
I... never said anything like this...
I didn't tell anyone to stop suspecting me. You
should
suspect me as I'm playing lynchbait. Technically, scum can also play lynchbait.
cavjj wrote:
??? Why stay quiet then? Surely that way of playing would mean you would have to play in a more active role? Observing doesn’t (necessarily) help the town, especially when you add in this quote:
My point is. It's not like individuals don't hit scum in their speculating, it's just, when we need to lynch together, people just prefer to vote in agreement with others so that we can actually lynch someone. So in that example, people would have voted X because "everybody talk about him and seem to suspect him" rather than Y because "no one really seems to strongly suspect him".
In fact that was from the same post! So we all have to agree on our lynch, but you don’t want to join in the discussion just yet and keep observing?
I don't see any solid discussion right now in which I can participate, and many times I just don't have something contributing to say either because it was already mentioned or because I simply... don't have it. And note how everything I say is blocked and called "weak" anyway. It's not like I'm staying quiet on purpose. I actually tend to play very actively in most games.
cavjj wrote:
I’ll just threw in this little beaut by the way:
All you do by being too active as town is becoming night kill target.
So you say, discuss the lynch but be quiet. Eh? How many times can you contradict yourself in two posts?
I never said to not discuss it. I just said that being awfully active and appear like a very hard protown worker isn't exactly the best way to stay alive for long. And Abel should understand this fact. Hence the fact he keeps playing with this style bothers me, even if he said he doesn't care about this stuff.
Inactives aren't helping anyone. If anything, they only cause harm.
Again. I compare VERY ACTIVE with VERY INACTIVE. I belong to neither of these groups and I explained what my opinion regarding those two extremes.
cavjj wrote:
And again
3.
Yeah, sorry for sleeping while the thread is the most active.
No. Sorry. Not good enough. I am also away from the “regular” time zone. While I presume most players in this game are from the States, I’m from the UK. I’m also asleep when people are most active. Yes that means you can’t often have constant one on one discussions with people because you are both online at the same time, but this shouldn’t contribute towards activeness.
I said that because suddenly people started calling me inactive when they talked a lot as soon as N1 ended. What could I do? I was sleeping and then I wasn't at home. It's not my fault you just went and made lots of comments while I was away. By the time I came back I somehow turned into an inactive player for whom players vote with this reason.
dicknose wrote:DarkClaymore wrote:dicknose wrote:you're right, my one post of nothing equals your whole iso
You have posted quite the amount of useless posts yourself. Amazing how Abel actually considers you most likely townie while me most likely scum due to not contributing.
alright. let's the two of us do a post recount of our own posts and each other's. i'll have mine up within twelve hours.
That's... the most pointless thing to do. Posting more doesn't make you any better. And how exactly it came to posts counting when I was talking about making pointless posts...?