Banshee wrote:A viable reason for someone to hide their identity is if they are being stalked or otherwise harassed online. And that, as I said previously, wouldn't be any of your business, would it?
Fair enough.
andrew94 wrote:@everyone you know how you demanded junpei's track. and he said vezok. what if vezok said he did go somewhere. who would you believe.
I'd personally believe Vezok. Regardless, a counterclaim is good because (I'm assuming bus drivers are really rare here, like Admiral told me):
a) we doubt the right person and find one scum
b) we doubt the wrong person and mislynch but find one scum the next day (or even vig tonight)
Question back at you, Andrew: what's the point in asking the question you just did?
Meransiel wrote:Can we get a prod on our lazy vig? Also still awaiting Rodion's response.
Meransiel wrote:It irks me that he "pretended" to have responded, tbh.
I beg your pardon?
Castle Bravo wrote:Rodion wrote:I liked Pinky's observation
on Silver
not putting much effort in derailing Zinger's lynch. It does seem like he didn't need to do anything else after people took that as a VT softclaim. Spoiler on Goomba was also pretty funny, I laughed hard!
I now have a scum read
on Shotty
because he:
1 - hammered Zinger without providing his reasons
2 - active lurking (posting a lot but without contributing, no reads - even though I asked him -, most posts are "one-liners"...)
I think that you're looking for an easy target to lynch again here, Rodion.
You have very little day-to-day consistency in your reads, which shows to me that the lynch you are happiest with is the lynch that gets the day over with.
What is the easy lynch you're referring to? Silver or Shotty?
I'm also irked by how shallow your "case" on me is (do not confuse that with OMGUSing everyone that attacks me as you'll see that was not the case when Banshee
actually
provided arguments). And, other than your shallow "case" on me, what else have you brought up to now?
Care to provide your top 5 scum reads? 2nd to 5th?
Castle Bravo wrote:chkballin wrote:Andrew, is a puzzling player in the way that he is VI. I never know if he's just being ridiculous or if he's scum- given that their are supposedly two neighborizors I am betting that they both aren't town so I could get behind an andrew lynch.
VI - villiage idiot? That's what the wiki says but I want to confirm.
If so are you claiming that you are too dumb to read an idiot? You are a very confusing player.
Yes, VI stands for village idiot.
I don't think he claimed to be too dumb to read an idiot. The fact is that people who behave irrationally are unpredictable.