In post 69, Friend wrote:Whispers: When you're online, you should be able to at least say something to me. If you weren't online and replying to other people I wouldn't be irritated.
Also, I didn't twist monk's statement at all. Do you feel like monk's "It was a trap" post was completely calm and collected?
Monk is a newbie. /end of discussion.
His actions are likely to have very weak reasoning and prolonging this discussion is only eating away at our time to lynch actual scum like Whiskers.
In post 81, Friend wrote:Pacific.
Aww, whispers, I'm not talking to you because you're really kind of an asshole and talking to you is going to get us nowhere but me saying "I'm right" and you saying "you're wrong."
Whispers is town and you should move your vote to someone who is contributing nothing original *cough* Whiskers *cough*.
Town reads so far are Silk and monk. Monk if only for his newb status. Whispersilk because she doesn't seem like scum with recent postings.
In post 87, Whiskers wrote:WHAT THE FUCK, HE'S ALIVE AND SHIT.
Friend wrote: I just don't think monk is a good enough player to think that far ahead. I've played with him before.
Thank GOD, I always worry that I'm just retarded or something, when I have an opinion. I'm glad I'm not the only one who feels that way.
Friend is right. Here, have a vote:
VOTE: whispersilk
A little more sheeping, much?
In post 92, Pseudonymous wrote:In post 88, Hiraki wrote:
THANKS FOR THE INSIGHT BROOOOOOOIn post 86, Pseudonymous wrote:Heh...traps...heh.
You're quite welcome.
Some of this looks pretty silly. Monk changes his vote, which prompts Empking to change his vote to Monk, causing Monk to vote Empking for falling into his "trap," which Friend goes along with. Whisper then votes Friend for being opportunistic, and then Whiskers votes Whisper for voting trap-setters, and then me just cause.
You can't take much of that seriously. I can't really see Monk's or Empking's actions as scummy. Actually, I can't see them as anything more than silliness. Now, reading through this, Friend doesn't come off too well. Not necessarily the alleged word-twisting, but I don't get a good feeling from him.
Nice way to summarize what has happened and effectively add nothing other than passive potshots at various players that you will likely use as your "basis" for voting someone later.
In post 101, Whiskers wrote:In post 99, Friend wrote:Guys, even though whisper is being annoyingly misguided I think she's town.
Now, ashblade, though...he's probably not.
*snip*
So this wagon is a go.
UNVOTE: Monk
VOTE: Ashblade
I'm gonna wait for a while. Your case on Ash is that he's weak and stuff? Why? We've got nice strong flailing right here in whispersilk.
Nice fail reasoning for switching a vote when you realize it is scummy as fuck to be voting monk and silk.Sil is not flailing scum.
In post 104, Whiskers wrote:Will we get to revisit this case in LyLo?
Un--fuck
UNVOTE: whispersilk Hate those tags.
Ya. Vote switching. You're scum, Whiskers. Try not to plant fail votes in the first place and pay attention. You're not actively reading this thread. Thinking you can get away with coasting?
Ya. Right.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Whiskers
You too? Do you want to contribute anything?
In post 115, Zdenek wrote:Is there a miller in the game?
Don't be fooled. he isn't a cop, he is scum trying to figure out whether or not there is a miller in this game because if there is, there is a cop. Zedenek and Whiskers scum team right here.
In post 118, Zdenek wrote:Why the hell is Whispersilk town by the way?
Disappointed that your mislynch is not going through? Ya. Sucks to be you.
I am more sure of Zedenek scum.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Zedenek
In post 132, Whiskers wrote:Vote: goddamnit
VOTE: monk
imma sheep ashblade here. Eh defends and attacks and doesn't afraid of anything.
You guys are so obvious it hurts. Damn.
Power roles > Whiskers.