Hopefully a more collected post later. 
In post 232, Thirdkoopa wrote:Hi there; I've been very busy (Which the entirety of September 8th and 10th was spent celebrating my birthday) but I'll be able to respond to everything later tonight.
In post 263, Whiskers wrote:Who's with him? Because suddenly Ashblade looks like he's killing it (the wagon).
In post 261, Ashblade wrote:
Now TK really needs to get his ass in here and actually fulfill his post promise. So until he actually does something townie.
Killjoy wrote:
Zedenek, how does me saying that you and Whiskers are scum make me scum? I see people do it all the time. Your recent posts have made me think that you are town, but your first posts are just horrible.
TK wrote:
Mute: I'm honestly feeling a town read out of this one. I can't find anything I dislike that makes him stick out. Maybe I need a more depth reason but he's providing out good content when he can post. (Town read, etc)
In post 267, Empking wrote:Third: The WEagon makes you think Zde is town?
In post 167, Mute wrote:..wow that took all of 10 minutes.
Vote Zdenek
Nothing substantial from this guy.
Zdenek wrote:Killjoy could very well be scum after that long post she just made. She defends Monk as town just because of his join date, which of course doesn't stop people from drawing scum. To me this claim looks like buddying with Hiraki for voicing a similar thought earlier. Attack on Whiskers for vote switching is weak. The attempt to call two of the scum team on day one and on page seven for terrible reasons is faking content and attempting to appear useful - it's pointless because of how likely it is to be wrong (in this case, I know she is wrong).
All of this? I wipe my bum with better fluff than this.
His first(ish) post asking for millers? Yeah not liking it.
Whiskers and Empking are my stronger town-reads, and I've my eye on Friend. Everyone else is in the middle.
In post 171, Zdenek wrote:Mute, why do you think the post you quoted was fluff?
In post 199, Mute wrote:In post 197, Zdenek wrote:In post 195, Mute wrote:In post 193, Zdenek wrote:I didn't vote you because of your average posting rate in this game. I never even mentioned average posting rate.
I think that it is a scum tell for a player not post while posting in other games especially if it occurs after someone votes them.
...
are you serious?
I asked you a question earlier, what about my post about Killjoy did you find fluffy?
You mean this?
In post 167, Mute wrote:..wow that took all of 10 minutes.
Vote Zdenek
Nothing substantial from this guy.
Zdenek wrote:Killjoy could very well be scum after that long post she just made. She defends Monk as town just because of his join date, which of course doesn't stop people from drawing scum. To me this claim looks like buddying with Hiraki for voicing a similar thought earlier. Attack on Whiskers for vote switching is weak. The attempt to call two of the scum team on day one and on page seven for terrible reasons is faking content and attempting to appear useful - it's pointless because of how likely it is to be wrong(in this case, I know she is wrong).
All of this? I wipe my bum with better fluff than this.
His first(ish) post asking for millers? Yeah not liking it.
Whiskers and Empking are my stronger town-reads, and I've my eye on Friend. Everyone else is in the middle.
The bold was the only thing of use from your post. How are you sure of that?
also:
Zdenek wrote:How about we wagon Empking who's nitpicking over RVS actions and avoiding this thread while posting elsewhere.
there's nothing, I feel, inherently scummy about not posting in a game thread unless it gets to where (1) they require constant prodding, (2) the [few] posts they have lack substance, and (3) they give no input of their own.
unless I'm mistaken.
In post 215, monk wrote:so zdenek, you're changing your question from "what" to "why" I can tell you why I think that post is fluffy. You basically sheep around making any definitive reason why you don't like killjoy and fencesit on a few issues that you bring up. The post is in no way useful to see what is going on with your reads.
In post 216, Mute wrote:In post 211, Whiskers wrote:That also begs the question of why Mute thinks I'm town.
Y U think I'm town, Mute? And of course, as monk said, Y U think I'm town, Zden?
Your posts ring of a town-vibe to me.
In post 213, Zdenek wrote:quote tag fail.
Indeed. Monk thankfully has hit the nail on the head with why I brought that up. My vote's comfy where it is for now.
In post 217, Zdenek wrote:Mute, on what issue did I fencesit?
In post 218, Mute wrote:In post 217, Zdenek wrote:Mute, on what issue did I fencesit?
Here, let me show you.
Your second and third posts aren't fence-sitting, but I disapprove of you flat out asking if there's a miller in the setup. But what really sucked about it was your response to being asked why you even brought that up. By saying "for future reference," you imply you've got confidence in staying alive.
Here you flat out call ashblade scummy, but instead of voting him, you in your next post voted for Empking.. while a wagon for monk was building steam? That I don't get. Nor this.. how can someone be town by reasons of "oh something's going on in another game so they must be town based on that?" That flat out blows me away. The actions of one game should affect that game only, and any attempt to connect one players actions across two active games is misguided. Do you know the alignment of either player in the other game? Even then, do you know the alignment of either player in this game? If no for either one, or both, then using another game to justify a players actions towards any motivation is bad. Plus your justification for that view is flat out misguided.
You're speaking in strong absolutes, accusing what, 3 or 4 people of being scum, and instead of voting them, you're voting for me and empking for asinine reasons. You're sitting on the fence because you're saying X, Y, and Z are scum, but not voting them. The way you word your responses speaks of whole-truths, and you always word them to be able to twist them to your liking upon being questioned.
You've stated indirectly (at least) twice you're confident about staying alive.
I aim to disprove that based on the reasons listed above.
In post 266, Whiskers wrote:What posts are townie and which are scummy? You guys are all saying yoiu're flipping your reads on me (which means, null, bascially, right?), but I want to know what I'm doing that you think is scum-telling.
In post 270, Pseudonymous wrote:Hey Ashblade, why don't you point out the posts that make Zed sound the way he does, instead of deferring to another game?
In post 162, Zdenek wrote:Whiskers is very likely town just for saying that she wants to lynch Monk because of something that is happening in another game.
In post 173, Zdenek wrote:Just to be clear, my post about Whiskers being likely town had nothing to do with meta. When scum make up reasons for the shit they do, they try to go with credible reasons, not grudges from other games. Plus, it's a hard excuse to fake. By no means am I saying it clears Whiskers, but it's enough for me to say that she'd be a bad day one lynch.
