Thunder wrote:I LOVE unnecessary walls. Because it's pretty freaking obvious that they ARE unnecessary, and that MEANS something. It tells us something about the poster. It gives us more of a chance to see flaws in arguments and contradictions.
I say: give me more walls.
If they are filled with content, we get closer to finding scum.
If they are filled with nothing meaningful, we get closer to finding scum, because townies should be always trying to contribute SOMETHING.
This post is a very townie post.
Thunderwielder wrote:I give up.
I am hereby giving up trying to get you to pull your weight for the town and resign myself to a stone cold wall of nothingness forever emanating from your slot (my hypocrite comment was directed at you not reading my posts, where I rephrased one of my questions, yet you played the hurt card ONCE AGAIN, and claimed I wasn't reading any of your posts, when I would really really truly like to see where you're coming from).
Oh, you hypocrite.
Thunderwielder wrote:By pushing a Saulres lynch, when you really have nothing to support that case, and saying it's the one of the two ONLY lynches you'll go for, without having a single piece of evidence other than supposition is crazy talk.
Mhmm. Sounds like you really want to lynch glowball
that
badly.
Thunderwielder wrote:I'm not comfotable with a Maruchan lynch today simply because Glowball is on that wagon.
Oh, you. Why the specific Glowball, because she spew out crap against Maruchan, but not anyone else on the wagon? (Other than Lane?)
Thunderwielder wrote:If I were scum
, playing in this fashion, I would probably still try to explain things--unless I didn't have explanation, in which case I would try and turn the tables using my emotions, and get into a ridiculous argument long enough for everyone to forget why I had received votes in the first place , and at the same time discredit my main attacker by getting him into a pointless argument that makes everyone devalue his opinion and his scumhunting capabilities.
Interesting to know how you would play as scum, but is that really true? I haven't seen your scum meta yet (There isn't really one from here. Durrrr).
Thunderwielder wrote:I think you might be confusing Maruchan with Supreme Overlord. He's the one who's had my back with the Glowball case, and we both are having very similar responses to things, whereas Maruchan's vote is still on you.
Thinking about this, is Supreme Overlord trying to buddy you like hell?
Thunderwielder wrote:I think this quote might disprove your Maruchan theory, Mothrax.
Why are you disproving someone else's theory for Maruchan? I don't seem to get it.
Thunderwielder wrote:Lane, every time you do something that's mildly productive, you come out again with one of these posts filled with sarcasm and defensiveness that makes you seem scummy to me. You should probably stop doing that.
I would vote lane over mothrax (but Glow over Lane). I still think we should give him a bit more time to respond. Maybe he'll pop up with a super duper townie read. I would just hate lynching someone who might have valuable things to say.
Funny how obvious scummy guy is getting lynched over the unproductive scum.
Thunderwielder wrote:Actually… I can really start to see the benefits of a Mothrax lynch. BUT I’d rather let him contribute more. Although at this point, I’m torn if he actually WILL contribute more, and if we’ll get anything out of him.
Pressure = More contribution. Do you think we would have got any information from him when he ISN'T being pressured?
Thunderwielder wrote:The aggressive attack back on her, as well as the vote, makes it seem like too much of an over-reaction. Also, now not commenting on anything regarding Lane's flip AKA why you were so adamant (I use this word in fond memory, Lane) that he was scum (sure, we all were), but more importantly what his flipping town means, makes me suspect you more than her case.
Mhm.
Thunderwielder wrote:I think Amrun's push is too aggressive for scum, and I've a towny read on Amrun pretty much all game.
Oh, she's
that
aggressive, alright.
Thunderwielder wrote:Sure, Mothrax isn't being productive, but if THAT was your main point (I can only infer perhaps that's what you meant by scum waiting--or were you talking about Maruchan? He said something of the sort before, right?), why not say it that way?
I apologize that I end up saying vague stuff that ends up being a misunderstanding on our parts. But yes, I'm also indirectly referring to Maruchan as well (Fluffy posts, I have to agree with you).
Looking at the glowball case, it's most likely the first time I've seen you really go that far to do so. Most of the time, you would be giving out reads with other people that comes with ISOs, but you're doing it on one post. And you aren't ISO'ing anyone.
But I still thunk you are town.
Talking about Amrun's aggressiveness, have you seen it on recent games that she's playing at the moment as town? No.
Amrun wrote:All I'm saying is this: Tragedy is posting like scum. She always posts somewhat like scum, but this time it is alarming me because it is a different like-scum than I am used to. Had I never played with Tragedy, I'd probably be MORE convinced Tragedy was scum.
You were more used to me being a complete dumbass. I'm basically trying to change that. And looking for bad things in your ISO is something I would be looking for, if I would think that you would be scum, obviously.
And you are scum in my eyes.
Amrun wrote:Tragedy is scum because she ISOed the first person on the drop down list and fabricated farcical reasons to call that person scum before reading anything else. That person is me, but quite honestly, it doesn't matter. It's only coincidental.
That's what I've been doing since Execution Mafia 2. Not fabricating shit (Unless I misunderstood the whole thing), Sorry.
Amrun wrote:This trend has continued. This is weird for Tragedy-town I know; she usually muddles along a bit, but eventually points out some good things. She assumes the best of people rather than the worst, usually. She is not that great at asserting her suspicions.
Can't accept my change? Yes, my first scum-play here was terrible, which was Frenzy Mafia.
Amrun wrote:You know Auckmid is scum, that's why.
I don't know why I don't have a scum QT, help me!
Amrun wrote:
My stance on shitwalls: My eyes glaze over, but I eventually read them. AT SOME POINT in the game, I usually even fully process them, but concision really is pro-town when at all possible.
Amrun wrote:I'm not even going to address the rest of your post on me because it's tossing bollocks. "Where is this" my ass. Try reading the actual game instead of just ISOing me because my name comes first alphabetically and calling me scum out of laziness.
Don't try to run away by saying "Your shit is bullshit", if you think it's bullshit, argue and point out the goddamn problems instead of being a bitch about it. I -might- ended up repeating this again from earlier, but whatever.