Lloyd wrote:Vote: Loudmouthlee
LouthmouthLee, I find you the most suspicious for the 4 reasons below.
---
1) You suspected tidus, but
hesitated in voting for him on 3 occasions
- In
post 102 to tidus
LoudmouthLee wrote:If I didn't like my DG vote so much, you'd be next.
- In
post 105LoudmouthLee wrote:The DG wagon has pretty much stopped.
[...]
My pick, although Tidus looks suspicious, is MoS.
[...]
I believe we have AT LEAST 1 scum in the group of Tidus, Cesspit, DG and MoS
- In
post 172 to tidus
LoudmouthLee wrote:Right now, MoS being guilty or not, I want to lynch you tomorrow.
---
You're going to fault me for thinking that Tidus was an overzealous newbie? Lloyd, you were one of the overzealous newbies at one point. Making stupid mistakes. I hate to give someone who seems like (obviously) it's their first game, a bandwagon when normally (a) they're innocent and (b) have no clue on how to play a pro-town role.
2) tidus's attacks against you seem contrived
- In posts
25,
75, and
100,
tidus was wishy-washy toward TCP, DG, and MoS
.
- In
post 102, you called out tidus for being non-committal.
- In
post 108,
tidus attacked strongly against you
, even though
he was wishy-washy before
.
- In
post 123, tidus continued to attack you.
- In
post 133, tidus unvoted you, and joined the MoS bandwagon.
- In
post 211,
you casted the 7th vote for tidus
.
- In
post 215,
tidus gave up and casted vote #8 for himself
, perhaps after a fellow scum (possibly you?) voted for him?
Sir. Without sounding arrogant, I have a title next to my name. Wouldn't it make sense, in hindsight, for a rookie scum to START ATTACKING the guy who's listed as the paragon of Mafia Hunters? C'mon now. He was scared of me and began to attack me.
Again, going back to your INITIAL POINT (which is flawed), Why would I bandwagon a newbie whop's BOUND to slip up anyway? Why not bandwagin MoS, a more experienced player? DUH.
---
3) You prematurely worried about HezLucky's vote in
post 82
Besides tidus, HezLucky was the only other person who voted for you on Day 1.
- In
post 83, HezLucky commented about your premature reaction.
And I'm sure you're going to say that this is the reason that Hez ended up dead, no? It's called Framing, Lloyd. I'm beginning to think that you're behind it. Keep it going.
---
4) After tidus confessed...You continue to waver between MoS and DG in your accusations, without considering timing of their votes for tidus
- You neglected to point out that MoS casted vote #2 for tidus in
post 178, and DG casted vote #4 for tidus in
post 180.
- When they casted their votes (#2 and #4) for tidus, MoS was leading with 6 votes.
*
Unless
either MoS, DG, or both are scum, and wanted to sacrifice tidus...
a) If MoS is scum, it seems unlikely that he would direct attention away from himself, and onto another scum (tidus) on Day 1 when it may implicate him (via HezLucky's theory earlier in
post 129)
b) If DG is scum, it seems unlikely that she would pass on an existing wagon of MoS, onto another scum (tidus) on Day 1
c) If MoS and DG are both scums, it seems unlikely that they would direct attention onto another scum (tidus) on Day 1 when it may implicate MoS (via HezLucky's theory earlier in
post 129)
You're making
* Your comments about MoS:
You were
inconsistent
in accusing MoS.
- In
post 105 [1st out of 1 vote for MoS]
LoudmouthLee wrote:He sits here, cries about how great he is, and lurks.
[...]
Unvote, but IGMEOY: DG and Vote: MoS
- In
post 171 [1st out of 6 votes for MoS]
LoudmouthLee wrote:MoS hasn't given me a single solitary reason to unvote him.
- In
post 211 [7th out of 7 votes for tidus]
LoudmouthLee wrote:If he comes up scum, we're definately going to need to lynch MoS.
- In
post 217 [7th out of 8 votes for tidus]
LoudmouthLee wrote:Got 'em! Three interesting posts for us to see. My recommendation is MoS or Cesspit tomorrow.
- In
post 233 [7th out of 11 votes for tidus]
LoudmouthLee wrote:With Tidus becoming scum, I feel that you lynch has become VERY necessary. Would Tidus not vote you for any other reason besides the protection of a scumbuddy?
Your reason in
post 233 doesn't make sense, because tidus voted for MoS in
post 133. tidus continued voting for MoS in
post 167.
- In
post 322 [1st out of 1 vote for DG]
LoudmouthLee wrote:My vote on MoS yesterday was on the basis of "under the radar", and today, I find no reason to vote him, either.
Today, you brush off your attacks against MoS as "under the radar", even though you advocated for MoS' lynch earlier for other reasons in posts
211 and
233.
* Your comments about DG:
- In
post 39 [4th out of 4 votes for DG]
LoudmouthLee wrote:I've had a few moments in the sun, but that does not make me a great player at all.
[...]
I learned from my last error in the 5 year invitational.
Vote: DG
While accusing DG and voting for her, it seems odd that you downplayed your abilities. Downplaying seems odd, but not suspicious per se.
- In
post 47 [still 4th out of 4 votes for DG]
LoudmouthLee wrote:However, the evidence against DG is much greater. I will, instead, FoS: Acts and keep my vote on DG.
- In
post 66 [4th out of 6 votes for DG]
LoudmouthLee wrote:Or... DG is scum and we're ALL just really smart townies."
- In
post 102 [still 4th out of 6 votes for DG]
LoudmouthLee wrote:If I didn't like my DG vote so much, you'd be next.
- In
post 105 [1st out of 1 vote for MoS]
LoudmouthLee wrote:I still think DG made a booboo when she "semi-cleared" Fritzler, as stated in my pbpa, but since we stalled, I can wait.
- In
post 322 [1st out of 1 vote for DG]
LoudmouthLee wrote:Her slip about Fritzler
[...]
Couple this with her erratic behaviour today, I believe it's probably wise to Vote: Dripping Goofball
Yesterday in
post 211 (before tidus confessed), you said we should lynch MoS if tidus comes up scum.
Also yesterday in
post 233 (after tidus confessed), you reinforced the idea of lynching MoS today because tidus confessed.
Today, you returned to accusing DG.
As I mentioned earlier...You accused MoS and DG, but you didn't point out circumstances under which they voted for tidus.
---
The following doesn't seem to indicate your alignment one way or another.
* In
post 108, tidus wrote "your second direct misinterpretation"
I couldn't find the first direct misinterpretation between you and tidus.
If you understood what tidus meant...Could you clarify what tidus was referring to as the "first direct misinterpretation"?
