SMBM II: Defense of Yoshi's Island (Final! MVPs announced!)

Bunnylover · Post Post #1375 (ISO) » Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:27 pm

Warrior, regardless if Vifam is lieing or not, I think its best for you to claim.
I do not understand the "passive" thing Vifam talked about. Basically she's claiming a type of bomb, but only to passive abilities? And Vifam claim a paratropper. Aren't paratropper usually enemies you kill? I could understand Stork been town, but not a paratropper.
Leaning on voting Vifam at the moment, just waiting for him to clear things up or fail at it.

Vifam · Post Post #1376 (ISO) » Wed Sep 28, 2011 1:06 pm

I think I've misread my role. Although I was claiming by pure memory at first.

MY ability is passive, the person visiting me must be active.

Kcdaspot · Post Post #1377 (ISO) » Wed Sep 28, 2011 1:35 pm

In post 1372, warriormode wrote:I want vifam to come back and explain himself first.

claim regardless.

both of you look shady as fuck.

Vifam misremembering his role is doubleplusungood.

warriormode · Post Post #1378 (ISO) » Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:19 pm

In post 1376, Vifam wrote:I think I've misread my role. Although I was claiming by pure memory at first.

MY ability is passive, the person visiting me must be active.

I also want you to say everyone who visited you, and what night please.

Vifam · Post Post #1379 (ISO) » Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:21 pm

In post 1378, warriormode wrote:
In post 1376, Vifam wrote:I think I've misread my role. Although I was claiming by pure memory at first.

MY ability is passive, the person visiting me must be active.

I also want you to say everyone who visited you, and what night please.

You

Night Two.

Vifam · Post Post #1380 (ISO) » Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:22 pm

If it was any other night, there would be two deaths Day Two.

Vifam · Post Post #1381 (ISO) » Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:23 pm

Day Three*

warriormode · Post Post #1382 (ISO) » Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:25 pm

the username you were told is what I'm looking for.

Kcdaspot · Post Post #1383 (ISO) » Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:34 pm

REREAD.

HE SAID RANMARU.

Vifam · Post Post #1384 (ISO) » Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:35 pm

In post 1382, warriormode wrote:the username you were told is what I'm looking for.

Ranmaru, I've already said that.

Kcdaspot · Post Post #1385 (ISO) » Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:39 pm

l33t ninja skillz.

warriormode · Post Post #1386 (ISO) » Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:58 pm

I know that. this is my point: there's no way Vifam would have been told Ranmaru if I did visit him.
Ranmaru was gone well before Night 2. he would have been told WARRIORMODE visited him!
How do you explain this Vifam?

Vifam messed uo huge when making up this claim. Its clear that he's lying scum.
We don't need to wait a night to find out, We can lynch scum NOW

implosion · Post Post #1387 (ISO) » Wed Sep 28, 2011 4:09 pm

Today, I'm kind of exhausted. Tomorrow I have school off but I'm planning to use the day to do actual

work

. If that plan falls through or i can find some spare time, I'll try to catch up a bit then. Otherwise, I should be able to find time over the weekend.

TheJakalope · Post Post #1388 (ISO) » Wed Sep 28, 2011 4:32 pm

Guys, I don't know who is being honest out of vifam and Warriormode. I'm more drawn toward Vifam, but what if Vifam is Mafia and kills warrior tonight?

warriormode · Post Post #1389 (ISO) » Wed Sep 28, 2011 5:52 pm

In post 1376, Vifam wrote:I think I've misread my role. Although I was claiming by pure memory at first.

MY ability is passive, the person visiting me must be active.

This excuse is really weak BTW.
First you tried acting like you knew what passive roles were.
Then when i called you out on it. You came up with this excuse...

There's no way you would have to come up with this excuse if you were town.
Town should be able to explain their roles clearly enough to make sense.
We only have to do is read our roles once to get it and explain it. Or at least if we didn't, we could PM the mod and ask before claiming.
And we definitely don't need to make up shit like this...

manho · Post Post #1390 (ISO) » Wed Sep 28, 2011 5:54 pm

^read this...

In post 1364, manho wrote:
In post 1362, chkflip wrote:
In post 1360, manho wrote:Nope, we are not lynching warrior or vifam today. We will know whether vifam is lying or not tonight. And we can lynch vifam tomorrow if warrior doesn't die tonight.

And when warrior is the mafia's NK... then what?

we lynch vifam if warrior flips town. we confirm vifam as town if warrior flips scum. that's easy.

warriormode · Post Post #1391 (ISO) » Wed Sep 28, 2011 6:04 pm

I did read this.
I don't agree.
The way I see it, we could risk mislynching today, or lynch obvscum today.
My goal is to make this as obvious to everyone as it is to me.

manho · Post Post #1392 (ISO) » Wed Sep 28, 2011 6:16 pm

no, that was to jakalope.

TheJakalope · Post Post #1393 (ISO) » Wed Sep 28, 2011 6:18 pm

Yeah, thanks. Understand now.

Kcdaspot · Post Post #1394 (ISO) » Wed Sep 28, 2011 6:59 pm

Manhos plan is awesome.

chkflip · Post Post #1395 (ISO) » Wed Sep 28, 2011 8:50 pm

We risk mislynching vifam if warrior flips town, though.

You have heard of a town poisoner, right? Because I have. And that's what Vifam's role sounds like, a modified poisoner.

manho · Post Post #1396 (ISO) » Wed Sep 28, 2011 9:48 pm

In post 1395, chkflip wrote:We risk mislynching vifam if warrior flips town, though.

You have heard of a town poisoner, right? Because I have. And that's what Vifam's role sounds like, a modified poisoner.

that's why we need warrior to claim. i think warrior has claimed not targeting vifam at all, so it's a 1v1 for sure.

Isa · Post Post #1397 (ISO) » Wed Sep 28, 2011 11:59 pm

WARRIOR SHOULD CLAIM. End of story.

Vifam, is your ability one-shot?

Isa · Post Post #1398 (ISO) » Thu Sep 29, 2011 12:04 am

I am asking because your ability seems awfully overpowered if it's not.

manho · Post Post #1399 (ISO) » Thu Sep 29, 2011 12:48 am

I think vifam is just a standard PGO. That's not OP.