In post 183, Beck wrote:I still want pine to respond to my request, but I think bvoight was on to something.
vote: Funkybike
Almost your entire ISO is evidence of your aggressive tendencies. I'm not going to spend half an hour or more rummaging through your posts to pick the ten most asinine things you've done. Most people that have commented thus far have agreed that you're extremely aggressive. Accept it.
In post 190, Revenus wrote:Rofl, yeah, you found 4 scum when almost half the game has barely posted, you are a mafia god.
Sarcasm, dude. SV was mocking Slandaar, Beck, and the other twits who think they have rock-solid cases already.
In post 191, iamausername wrote: In post 164, theamatuer wrote:One of beck/pine is probably scum. Of course, considering Beck's record, he's probably caught another townie again >.>
Also David? You'd probably find a lot of similarities with rev.
This post is the scummiest post in the game.
In post 176, theamatuer wrote:Basically, both people used rather weak reasons to attack the other, which is kinda acceptable considering theres only 7 pages, but the fact that this happens at 7 pages is kinda suspicious.
A possibility is that beck attacked Pine, who is scum, for weak reasoning, and that Pine reacted and starting attacking Beck in retaliation.
Of course, there really isn't anything I can see that currently puts one on top of the other in terms of scumminess, so I'll just
fos: beck and Pine
I'll probably change one to a vote when a majority appears on one or if one turns scummier than the other.
pedit: just saying, but considering curfews, I wont be active at all on weekdays. I could probably crank out a few posts, but It'll have to take the weekends to start posting as much as i want to.
ppedit: wth. invalid form
Wait, no, it's this one.
UNVOTE: DavidParker
VOTE: theamateur
This is a very good point. Also note the opportunism that theamateur has been displaying.
In post 192, Beck wrote:I'm good and pissed now, if pine and crackhead viewpoint don't explain why both of my cases are wrong (and actually can explain the town motivation behind their play) I'll push on these 2 mofos for the remainder of the game
This is an example of bad gameplay, regardless of alignment.
Beck, your cases are simply weak. There aren't really holes, per se, they just aren't nearly as significant as you keep making them out to be. You make mountains out of molehills, and react to every attack on you with personal fervor.
I'm really starting to have a hard time seeing you as scum at this point. I don't think you'd be this dumb as scum.
In post 197, Beck wrote:Oh, almost forgot
vote: shattered aka crackhead
Arrogance like yours is unfucking necessary.
This is also bad gameplay, regardless of alignment. Oh, and a superb example of your unnecessary aggression. Your case on SV amounts to "Oh my God, you suck! You don't agree with me, and then YOU VOTED FOR ME! I'm going to concoct an insulting nickname for you, and then vote you! Not for a good reason, but because you voted for me first!"
-----------------------
I would like to ask people to stop voting for Beck. He's not worth a mislynch. He's vig/SK bait.
