In post 746, chunkykev wrote:I%u2019ve %u201Cexpressed an interest%u201D in Shattered in post #296 and #572, and I even asked Shattered to respond to my earlier posts in post #656, in the very same post I responded to DGB and before I was accused of ignoring people that are not DGB.
In post 747, kuribo wrote:In post 746, chunkykev wrote:Firstly, how could I have known she was not %u201Creading the game / half-assing it / whatever she's doing%u201D? I don%u2019t know her personal life and she only posted about that after I had put my vote down. I have explained this already%u2026
lolwhut
In post 638, DrippingGoofball wrote:
Here's what.
My husband threatened to leave me, said he'd been miserable for 26 years and there was nothing I could do to change his mind. I ran to find a job because I was going to have to make ends meet more solidly than with my web income alone.
I am now spending my days lining up lightbulbs and climbing giant ladders to move merchandise at a hardware store, for minimum wage. At 46. With a Master's degree in Molecular Biology.
He's back, but I'm not taking any chances.
So.
I'm sorry if I'm not in the mood for long winded cases.
You're getting what I can give.
If that's not good enough, lynch me.
In post 674, chunkykev wrote:I have continually asked Goofball about her posts (yes, not about the specific reads, but if she's going to give reads on multiple people then I want reasons for them all). The fact she has continued to ignore my questioning and continued to post reads with no reason is enough for me to put my vote down and hopefully get some answers from her.
You absolutely did accuse her of ignoring your questioning after she explained what was going on.
This isn't a matter of opinion, it is irrefutable fucking fact.
In post 748, kuribo wrote:In post 746, chunkykev wrote:You've got to be joking. If you are trying to build a case against me, how about actually looking at the facts?I voted DGB in post #637 and being accused of ignoring people that are not DGB happened after that (in post #678 and is clearly wrong). I%u2019ve %u201Cexpressed an interest%u201D in Shattered in post #296 and #572, and I even asked Shattered to respond to my earlier posts in post #656, in the very same post I responded to DGB and before I was accused of ignoring people that are not DGB.So why did you claim I hadn%u2019t expressed an interest in Shattered until after I was wrongly accused of focusing just on DGB? Deliberately ignoring the facts to make me look bad or a genuine mistake?
I'm not saying you ignored DGB, I'm saying you ignored everyone BUT DGB and waited until it was viable to throw your vote down.
In post 750, kuribo wrote:what does this even mean, expressed an interest?
In post 745, kuribo wrote:He doesn't even express an interest in Shittered QuoteTags until after it's pointed out that he's been ignoring people who aren't DGB.
In post 749, kuribo wrote:In post 746, chunkykev wrote:For those that commented (Reck, Kuribo), I'm curious to know if you were happy for me to be killed as you believe I am scum, or you were happy for a daykill to move the game on (a genuine day kill of me would have had a good chance of Hindu being lynched).
actually a genuine daykill of you had a good chance of confirming Hindu as town, but thanks for playing
In post 757, Pine wrote:Pfft. You're still in the process of going down hard, so while that added detail is somewhat pertinent, it is also largely irrelevant.
In post 762, xRECKONERx wrote:oh what the hell did I just wake up to... this kev wagon isn't great guys
In post 765, xRECKONERx wrote:I wasn't cheering his dayvig... I just wanted PROGRESS.
In post 769, xRECKONERx wrote:"Yes, choose to vote for a big wagon or a wagon that really only I support."
In post 771, xRECKONERx wrote:Kublai Khan, do you think you're reading too much into things, Kublai Khan?
xRECKONERx wanted D1 over a long time ago, Kublai Khan. D1 is still going on and we've basically gotten nowhere. Kublai Khan, don't you think a flip of some sort would be good and help us move the game along? xRECKONERx does, and that's why he wanted that dayvig to be real.
In post 771, xRECKONERx wrote:Kublai Khan, do you think you're reading too much into things, Kublai Khan?
xRECKONERx wanted D1 over a long time ago, Kublai Khan. D1 is still going on and we've basically gotten nowhere. Kublai Khan, don't you think a flip of some sort would be good and help us move the game along? xRECKONERx does, and that's why he wanted that dayvig to be real.
In post 752, chunkykev wrote:If you take stuff out of context then you can make it suit your argument but let's put it back in context. Post #674 (feel free to go and actually read it) which you have just quoted part of to show that I accused her of ignoring questions after I knew what was going on in her personal life shows no such thing. That was said in direct response to Khan asking me about my "enough is enough vote post" and that was my reason for that post and my vote (which, I'm sure I don't need to remind you, was before she mentioned her real life situation).So are you going to continue to try and build a case on misinformation?