In post 931, Amrun wrote:In post 928, VP Baltar wrote:
glowball wrote:Mmkay so should Llam turn out to be town, Vi deserves death.
I really don't see why you weren't vigged last night. Also, don't give Vi credit for calling Llam on BS contradictions when I was saying that since early o'clock. Hate on me if you're gonna hate.
Maybe because we lynched the vig, derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrp. What is the point of this comment?
VPB wrote:xvart wrote:The real question is whether or not the JK on VP was the reason for one less kill.
lol, wut? so there's a SK in this game?
Kk wrote:Did Llamarble just claim Serial Killer?
xvart beat him too it, see above.
But earlier, when I called you on this same thinking, it wasn't indicative of anything. Now you use it against xvart? What?
1) it was an off-hand comment because glowball is being pretty ridiculous throughout this game
2) It's not the same at all. Hearing the word 'third party' and thinking SK is not the same as saying 'there was only one kill last night, therefore VP is the SK.'