ok... so you think Flay is scum, and you vote me. I did think Fritz was scummy earlier, but he kept up his act and is not scummy. I think Flay on the other hand isFuldu wrote:I still like my creampuffeater vote from yesterday. Between Flay and Fritzler (not the only options, but the main two under discussion), I'm more inclined to suspect Flay, but past evidence suggests that I'm naturally more inclined to suspect Flay.
vote: creampuffeater
No, that sentence is correct. In this game, I suspect Flay more than I suspect Fritzler, but past experience indicates that I naturally tend to find Flay suspicious, whether he's scum or not, so that may not be the best indicator.Dead Rikimaru wrote:Would I be right to assume that there should be a Fritzler in place of one of those Flays?Fuldu wrote:I'm more inclined to suspectFlay, but past evidence suggests that I'm naturally more inclined to suspectFlay.
That one? I remember reading it yesterday, didn't reread it today til now. Your comment on the initial DGB vote is interesting--the stated reason for the vote is unusual, even for a first post vote.Fuldu wrote:Caught scum show up in most of the comparative posts as the less suspicious individual, but often in such a way as to be justifiable later on. Also, a random vote on DGB at the beginning that doesn't threaten her but creates some amouont of voting pattern.
The only contrast to this is that creampuff was on the tidus lynch before he outed himself, and that deserves some slack. But what I find odd is that, instead of being emboldened by a successful lynch, creampuff seems to have backed off substantially since then, as if it wasn't quite the outcome he was hoping for.
Sorry; what I meant to say there was that few-person discussions in a game with this many players left means a) lurking scum get off free for a while, and b) scum in that small group have a comparatively greater chance to control the tone of the discussion. I'm not certain about Fritzler, of course; I think I just find him scummy/irritating in general.MrBuddyLee wrote:If the three of you are town, that's correct, you're more likely to whip up paranoia and end up lynching an innocent. But if one or more of you is scum, your discussion is nearly certain to benefit town. Also, you've been finding Fritzler scummy, and are currently voting for him, but that statement just kinda implied you think he's town.Mr. Flay wrote:A three-way discussion between us, however, is likely to just benefit the scum, whoever they are....
*laugh* Ain't that the truth. We're we in the (losing) endgame of Good Omens, going at each other's throats?Fuldu wrote:In this game, I suspect Flay more than I suspect Fritzler, but past experience indicates that I naturally tend to find Flay suspicious, whether he's scum or not, so that may not be the best indicator.
Well, in general, sure, there's always a chance that the lynch can be stopped. In that specific case, though, with the deadline so close and there being so many votes on neon and no one else having anywhere close to as many votes, I was pretty sure that neon was going to get lynched, and I doubt anyone else could have come to a different conclusion. I would still think that knowing the bandwagon was going to be on a good guy, scum would be more likely to sit back and wait for the deadline lynch instead of dropping the hammer like that. Not that that's evidence broomhead's a good guy, or anything like, just that I don't see dropping the hammer in that situation as a scum tell.Mr. Flay wrote:Yos: I'm inherently conservative when it comes to throwing the hammer; therefore even on the chance that broomhead is a bloodthirsty townie, I don't see it as pro-town/helpful behavior. That sort of thing can get us killed should we reach a Lynch-Or-Lose endgame. I would NEVER say that a lynch is a foregone conclusion before the hammer is thrown; just looking at the voting pattern in this game should answer that, and we don't have any investigative/useful roleclaims to rescue people.
, but there is a good chance he's the recruit, and since Fritz did kinda sac DG early on, i'm more inclined to think flay is the play than fritz. That was 9 days ago, and dispite his promise to "be of some help", that was his only post of the day.broomhead wrote:*hangs head* yeah, my bad, today i will be of some help.MrBuddyLee wrote:broomhead posted nothing but one defensive post yesterday--didn't help find scum, didn't vote.
i am going tovote llyodbecause of yesterday. i wasn't happy with him switching around his vote when the bandwagon was at the top, i think he wanted to get off a townie's bandwagon to look more innocent.
I'm not saying the lynches aren't important, because they are, but there's a lot of bad plays/bad information in there. NKs, on the other hand, are 100% and solely the responsibility of the mafia, so they're a clear insight into the scum personality in this game, unadulterated by power role considerations. A criminal profile, if you will.Norinel wrote:tidus_of_zanarkand (Mafia) - lynched Day 1
HezLucky (Townie) - killed Night 1
kirbyphreak (Replacing logicticus) (Townie) - killed Night 2
Mastermind Of Sin (Townie) - killed Night 3
PookyTheMagicalBear (Replacing Mini Neo) (Townie) - killed Night 5
Thesp (Replacing TSAGod) (Townie) - killed Night 6
Lee/BuddyLee? Twomz? . 