Mini 380: Artifacts- Game over

conflux · Post Post #150 (ISO) » Sun Nov 26, 2006 4:58 am

Still playing.

GreenLiquid · Post Post #151 (ISO) » Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:48 am

I'm not sure if I've been replaced, but I am here if I'm not.

Nai · Post Post #152 (ISO) » Thu Nov 30, 2006 9:50 am

And I'm here, post second crash.

Coron · Post Post #153 (ISO) » Thu Nov 30, 2006 9:54 am

Hi guys

Stewie · Post Post #154 (ISO) » Thu Nov 30, 2006 10:59 am

Still here.

Jules · Post Post #155 (ISO) » Thu Nov 30, 2006 2:48 pm

I'm gonna read through the thread when I've got time. Got exams coming up just to let you know I'm still here

Nightfall · Post Post #156 (ISO) » Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:25 pm

Still on Conflux here, even without the crash I doubt hed have posted anything...

Zindaras · Post Post #157 (ISO) » Fri Dec 01, 2006 4:08 am

Okay, I've reread the entire thread, and I'm suspicious of Nai (for being extremely aggressive towards Coron, literally trying to make everything he says scummy, even when it's obviously not) and perfect/luna (both for making really odd votes on Coron).

Norinel · Post Post #158 (ISO) » Fri Dec 01, 2006 5:57 am

Well, everyone's back after the latest crash except lunalovegood and perfect62834, who I was trying to replace anyway, and conflux and HackerHuck, who I'll give some time. I don't think it's worth too much of a prod or replacement search right now unless I have some assurance the site will stay up longer than a week this time.

Edit: GreenLiquid- You're still in.

Zindaras · Post Post #159 (ISO) » Fri Dec 01, 2006 6:29 am

I've told conflux the site's up again.

conflux · Post Post #160 (ISO) » Fri Dec 01, 2006 6:32 am

Replace me, please.

Coron · Post Post #161 (ISO) » Sat Dec 02, 2006 5:51 am

so, back to lynching nai then?

Nai · Post Post #162 (ISO) » Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:34 am

It's funny that HE can say something like that, and he doesn't seem to get nailed. Whereas I give reasons why I think he should be lynched, and everyone gets on my butt about it.

Coron · Post Post #163 (ISO) » Sat Dec 02, 2006 10:09 am

You act like I haven't said why I was supicious of you ever. I choose not to repeat myself, I'm sorry.

Nai · Post Post #164 (ISO) » Sat Dec 02, 2006 10:24 am

Is it wrong to find it suspicious that you can't recap this? I think a lot of it was also lost in the crash, which would be nice to have again.

Nai · Post Post #165 (ISO) » Sat Dec 02, 2006 10:25 am

EBWODP: I mean, honestly, if you don't recap your arguments, I can't defend myself. And I can't think of any reason a townie wouldn't want to make sure his target isn't a townie.

Coron · Post Post #166 (ISO) » Sat Dec 02, 2006 10:59 am

You can't read the thread? I'm sorry, but I don't help people that don't help themselves.

Nai · Post Post #167 (ISO) » Sat Dec 02, 2006 12:43 pm

I know that a lot of conversation was lost in the first crash, and much of that was between me and you. So no, I can't read the lost posts.

HackerHuck · Post Post #168 (ISO) » Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:18 pm

I'm here and enjoying the bickering between Nai and Coron.

Coron · Post Post #169 (ISO) » Sun Dec 03, 2006 12:03 pm

Nai wrote:Right... And FOS and a Vote on me. Fantastic.

Vote: Coron
for an obvious scum tactic of throwing suscpicion on people for an FOS and... Well, nothing.

overreaction, overdefensive.

Nai wrote:I'm enjoying my vote on Coron, to let you know. Especially with that slip.

plays it up as a "slip" without really expanding on how it is a perfectly reasonable thing to say.

Nai wrote:I think Coron should probably start claiming right about now.

fishing over a stupid worthless page 2 bandwagon.

Nai wrote:My main argument is that he's far too sure of himself, and I really don't see, in any way, how he can be like that. I mean, I can see how it would be a joke to begin with that he calls me and Nightfall scum buddies (me included ONLY because Nightfall voted for me), but he hasn't let it go. That suggests to me that he has some sort of outside information here. And there's no way he would have given an item so broken as to say "You have a one-shot chance to find a scum and all his buddies", or any such thing. To hold onto a belief is playing like Fritzler, and I find that Fritz is often wrong. So...

Continued overreaction and saying he thought I might have info, he still persued trying to lynch me. For all he knows I was a cop with one guilty trying to feel out connections to my guilty result.

Overall his reactions seem similar to some I've seen by scum. Very overreactive to small things, very very jumpy play.

Nightfall · Post Post #170 (ISO) » Tue Dec 05, 2006 2:58 am

Nai, I'm curious here, What would you say the one big reason your voting Coron is?

Nai · Post Post #171 (ISO) » Tue Dec 05, 2006 11:40 am

My biggest reason? Being completely overconfident in himself with absolutely no reason to be so, probably, followed by defending Jules with a made up story.

GreenLiquid · Post Post #172 (ISO) » Tue Dec 05, 2006 1:58 pm

You two are looking so scummy, it's not even funny. There's practically no logic in your arguments and its lasted like, what, 7 pages? I mean, there's so little reason for this that I seriously consider it being a scum tactic.

Coron · Post Post #173 (ISO) » Tue Dec 05, 2006 4:12 pm

I'm not overconfident, I'm just right.

Nai · Post Post #174 (ISO) » Tue Dec 05, 2006 4:28 pm

Well, there's also this other small thing. See, you built an entire case against me off of absolutely nothing (i.e., the reaction I made to your post in the beginning), and then have been subsequently adding things to it as if they make your argument any more valid. You made stuff up to begin with, and are adding things to it to make it seem like more than a house of cards.

I'm just voting you because you're doing that, and have been doing that, and your overconfidence about absolutely nothing is part of that.