Open 9 - Basic Twelve Player (Game Over!) - before 400

[ShadowLurker]

AndrewS is clearly defending Masterchief, his scum partner.

Vote: AndrewS

[ShadowLurker]

Unvote Vote: Fircoal

Please explain where you found instances of bad logic, or what things he did to make you think he's town. Until then, my vote isn't moving.

[ShadowLurker]

BM: Shut up for a bit, it'll help the town.

[ShadowLurker]

You guys evidently take this VERY seriously, and have turned this into a sort of culture. I am new to this site, and whilst i know the basic mechanics of the game, i am not used to being criticised for every innocent post i make. That is, i suppose, what comes with being good at the game. I have not heard of many of these abbreviations, which i expect are unique to this game, and possibly this website, however that does not make me scum.
Anyway, it seems that most of you are quite willing to scapegoat me, making me very suspicious that you are Mafia. It looks like im going for the chop, but when i do, and you realise i am innocent, i want an apology from each and every person who voted for me.
Failure to deliver this, will incriminate you to the extent of being the next to go.

You seem to be the one taking this VERY seriously.

[ShadowLurker]

FoS: IH

[ShadowLurker]

TCS: What is your opinion on this meta statement: "One Day 1 lynch is as good as any other."

[ShadowLurker]

SV and IH: I retract the FoS.

Unvote Vote IH

[ShadowLurker]

[ShadowLurker]

LOL WRONG THREAD IGNORE

[ShadowLurker]

So our three scum are AndrewS, IH, and TCS, which one of them should we lynch first?

[ShadowLurker]

err do you even know what an OMGUS is?

Unvote, Vote AndrewS

for having such poor reasoning for a vote.
Also

FOS: ShadowLurker

for being so damn confident about the Mafia.

Unvote, Vote: Akbar

Both an OMGUS and bad logic.


Plus, y'know, he kinda cheated us with that deathtrap airship thing...

So being confident about the Mafia makes me Mafia? What wonderful logic skills.

[ShadowLurker]

3) This whole bandwagon started because I suggested SV as scum because I missed one post from her. Mafia would not, however, tend to speak up so quickly.

You're an idiot if you think that's a sound argument.

[ShadowLurker]

How do you explain a dead doc "without a night" ? Daykills?

I'm fairly certain AndrewS is town by the way. All votes should be off him, look over his posts in isolation, he dropped an extremely strong town tell.

Mafia would be confident about ones scumbuddys being mafia.

And I have 3 scumbuddies?

[ShadowLurker]

SV: That post is full of hypocrisy.

Good thing hypocrisy isn't a scum tell though.

[ShadowLurker]

The tell is obvious to anyone protown.

[ShadowLurker]

AndrewS: Can you guess what the tell is?

[ShadowLurker]

I obviously meant "..I think you are wrong about that" Instead of "..are you fking stupid"

Common typo, I understand.

[ShadowLurker]

Alright, I've reread my posts several times. I cannot identify this tell. If it was something that was easily identifiable, every mafia would use it and it would no longer be a town tell. I appreciate your vote of confidence...But I can't identify what this tell is.

Well for example, if someone genuinely voted a person that was killed last night because he/she thought the dead person was lurking, would you think they were scum?

[ShadowLurker]

Sorry, not the greatest logic. I could be scum voting for that person just to make you think that I'm not.

Oh you could be

now

, but how often does mafia intentionally do that, in fact, it didn't even cross your mind until I pointed it out did it? I'm sad I had to ruin one of the greatest town tells ever now though.

[ShadowLurker]

I'm going to throw suspicion on lowell here: for basically clearing 3 out of 10 people... that's 33.3%, for reasons that I don't think are valid.

In Switch Mafia I believed I cleared 4/9 people, and was right about 3 of them. I do not recall you throwing suspicion on me there, why now?

[ShadowLurker]

I would like to point out SV was scum in that game, and I gave no reasoning whatsoever.

[ShadowLurker]

i implore everyone not on the IH wagon to think carefully about what it signifies. This game certainly hasnt been the most lively ive participated in, and i somewhat feel sorry for those who are Mafia in it, as it must be a real drag. It is my OPINION (as believe me when i say it is nothing more than speculation) that those who are pushing for a lynch most, are these frustrated Mafia.
I personally dont think we have enough evidence to lynch him, and i am greatly suspicious of those who are piling him.
The Central Scrutiniser has been especially keen to lynch him recently.
Im not saying that i think IH is innocent, but TCS has been exhibiting some pretty scummy behaviour recently, and is certainly worthy of my vote.

Good Appeal to Emotion

Unvote Vote BM

[ShadowLurker]

I prefer to think of it as a good attempt at avoiding a Townie-Lynch.
Afraid of the fact that i have worked out ur scumbuddies perhaps?

Yes both are obviously true.

[ShadowLurker]

1.Hypocrisy would=scumminess Shadowlurker in the case of spectrumvoid (who I am most suspiciosu of at the moment)

1.Votes someone
2.Others agree with her, and also vote them
3.Becomes suspicous, and accuses the person who would be on the bandwagon for the same reason.

= | I seriously haven't seen any coherent case against me other than ShadowLurker saying "IH is scum. SV is scum. TCS is scum. Who's ready to lynch?"
he also compares that game to Switch mafia, which I would say a no to, since we had a little bit more information too.

I don't like how TCS suddenly jumped onto me, first with the intention to wagon me, and then acting as if he actually saw something scummy.

So, is there a case on me besides lurking the hell out of this game?

unvote, vote:SpectrumVoid

Make your posts more coherent.

Are you suspicious of me?

If yes, reasons?

Hypocrisy is not a scumtell.

[ShadowLurker]

The scumgroup of the day is AndrewS and Lowell.

Votes on either would be appreciated.

Unvote Vote Lowell

[ShadowLurker]

The scumgroup of the day is AndrewS and Lowell.

Votes on either would be appreciated.

Is that the same AndrewS as this:

I'm fairly certain AndrewS is town by the way. All votes should be off him, look over his posts in isolation, he dropped an extremely strong town tell.

?

Well, if you really want, I can give you links to around 75 games or so that I've read/played in.

Please, please don't. Ever.

Yea. +protown points for ripley

[ShadowLurker]

HOS: ShadowLurker

I really don't like how he pops in once a page and comes up with (different) scumgroups, but on the whole contributes shit-all to the discussion. And what he has contributed has been self-contradictory. I don't like how he FoS'd IH, voted him, retracted the vote (all without stating the reason), and now does not hammer him, I don't like how he once exonerated AndrewS by calling him "certain" town and now declares AndrewS to be part of the mafia.

In fact, I find this ridiculous.

unvote, vote: Shadowlurker

, who is obvious scum along with IH.

What would you like me to expand upon thouth unworthy mortal?

[ShadowLurker]

HOS: ShadowLurker

I really don't like how he pops in once a page and comes up with (different) scumgroups, but on the whole contributes shit-all to the discussion. And what he has contributed has been self-contradictory. I don't like how he FoS'd IH, voted him, retracted the vote (all without stating the reason), and now does not hammer him, I don't like how he once exonerated AndrewS by calling him "certain" town and now declares AndrewS to be part of the mafia.

In fact, I find this ridiculous.

unvote, vote: Shadowlurker

, who is obvious scum along with IH.

I'm only 10 days more experienced than you so don't try to pull that newb card.

[ShadowLurker]

I'm sorry I didn't find the scumgroup 100% on page 3 or whatever and changed my mind, that obviously makes me scum I guess.

1) Why IH was scummy and then stopped being so in your eyes, not hammering him, and not even mentioning his wagon in your posts.

I wanted to see a reaction, he had been lurking. While he is still lurking, I didn't really find anything unsual to warrant him being lynched. Glad you find my position switch so alarming yet no one elses.

2) Why Andrews had a "huge town tell" that made you "almost certain" of his innocence, but is now part of the scumgroup.

Plz read the preceding page.

[ShadowLurker]

I'm extremely wary of the way TCS is jumping through hoops held by Akbar.

FOS: both of them

Scum buddy leading scum buddy.

FOS SV

for framing.

You conveniently left out the part about me threatening to lynch TCS if IH is town.

Why isn't IH lynched yet?

Ok, I'll help ya bandwagon. Of course, if he turns out to be town, this combined with my earlier suspicion of you, will confirm your scum.

Vote IH

That makes you even more suspicious.

Unvote Vote Akbar

[ShadowLurker]

Lol the accusations of me are so bullshit and stretched it's not even funny.

1. I NEVER THOUGHT ANDREWS WAS SCUM. I knew he was obviously town and would bet money on it. And I was right.

2. I wasn't trying to "derail the IH wagon onto Akbar." I was trying to MOVE the IH wagon onto Akbar. Earlier in the day I had picked up some minor scumtells from IH and voted him for it, his reactions to the wagon had nothing wrong with them, while Akbar was acting scummy as hell so my vote subsequently changed. I was leaning town on IH at the end of the day.

3. Lowell's behavior isn't even close to his behavior as scum, he is Town.



So basically, I wouldn't mind lynching Akbar still. The growth of his bandwagon while IH's doesn't at all implicate him as town.

Vote Fircoal

[ShadowLurker]

Lol the accusations of me are so bullshit and stretched it's not even funny.

1. I NEVER THOUGHT ANDREWS WAS SCUM. I knew he was obviously town and would bet money on it. And I was right.

3. Lowell's behavior isn't even close to his behavior as scum, he is Town.

The scumgroup of the day is AndrewS and Lowell.

Votes on either would be appreciated.

Yeah, I'm obviously stupid enough as to call AndrewS guranteed protown in my posts and then say he's scum in one of my next ones. Everything I do has a reason.

[ShadowLurker]

I wouldn't mind a Twito lynch actually.

[ShadowLurker]

That's a convenient way of saying that you had no reason?

Is this post a convenient way of saying "I'm a fucking dumbass" ?

[ShadowLurker]

See nothing intelligent to answer to.

[ShadowLurker]

Lowell not paying attention to the setup is disconcerting but a point in his favor.

Vote: Fircoal