ugh, I read that wrong, joke doesn't work.Primate wrote:that's pheoneticsJalyn wrote:Well, it's not my fault that whoever decided on the spelling of the word had no base understanding of phonetics.
(Alternate answer: Doh! Sorry)
<-----dumbass
My vote on phoebus in my opinion was justified his vote against mole purley on the basis that he dislikes him is suspicious.VitaminR wrote:Vote: kinkster
Didn't like his vote on DP at all. Nor his vote on Phoebus.
I don't think there's anything scummy about what TS did. Overtly pushing a wagon Day 1 is not what scum does. It's counter-productive.
Distracting.Toaster Strudel wrote:Yep. That's exactly what I am doing. Same as Cubsfan. But hey. Day 1, gotta put pressure on someone, doesn't really matter who. I doubt we'll end up lynching Cubsfan today anyway, that's just a Day 1 wagon. Just tossing my little lump of coal into the engine.
Just plain scummy.Toaster Strudel wrote:Let's lynch Cubsfan, K? It's not big deal he's only got 4 votes. There's room to pile more.
Toaster, you're missing it completely. On Day 1, people should be able to provide a logical defense. Day 1 isn't about starting a wagon to get someone out; it's about starting a wagon in order to force people to react, and make decisions based on their reactions. And you definitely reacted in a way we didn't like. No one has a problem with you adding a vote to the wagon. The problem is the things you said in doing so. They just sound scummy. So, a logical defense would be convincing us that the things you said were not things scum in your position would say.There's no "logical defense" - it's Day 1. Gotta start a wagon somewhere. Who knew adding a third or fourth vote was so scummy?
~N9V~ wrote:Whenever I vote because of a wagon, it is always the last person to jump on that I vote for.
Raffles wrote:How on Earth do you justify he's the last person to join the band wagon, when you don't even give more than 2 HOURS before someone else joins a bandwagon? There are 18 players in this game, I would consider a day just about too short to justify that decision.
Raffles objection here is ludicrious. ~N9V~ (I HATE typing that!) didn't say that he would vote for the absolute last person that would ever put a vote on a bandwagon. He would never be able to vote if that was his criteria. (Jalyn voted! But someone might vote after her, better wait!) He said that he placed a vote for the last person to have voted on the bandwagon. Which is exactly what he did.~N9V~ wrote:And yes, Panzerjager was last to join, and he was last to join before I posted. Noone else has jumped on the bandwagon, so my vote stays.
Ok so u did it to stir discussion and discussion is what ive continued I dont know u or mole couldnt careless if u dislike him or not fact of the matter ure now getting angry and agitated by my coments.Phoebus wrote:Phoebus---><---kinkster
A) I don't dislike mole. Get it in your noggin'
I did it as an attempt to stir discussion. Which it has. And no, I would not have been too unhappy even if he'd been lynched without posting. There is information to be had in all behaviour.
B) You voted for me because you disliked my vote. No more reason.
C) VitaminR is voting you for practically the same reason. However, I will call it a similar reason.
D) Dear Sarcasmo, did you have more basis or explanation than VitR does?
Phoebus---><---kinkster
P.S.: Thanks Stoof!
No, but I would say that they were currently the last person in line. And claiming that that was crap, because there might be more people that would get in line, would not change the fact that they were indeed currently the last person in the line.Raffles wrote: Think of it this way, there's a school cantene and serving has just started. 5 minutes in, queues are starting to form. Would you honestly call the last person in the queue after 5 minutes the last person who gets served? Of course not. You'd wait out until the queue has reached it's full length, and once the queue has started shrining, then you could be right in saying the last person in that queue could be the last one to get served.
Surely you must have found someone more suspicious to vote for than a nonvoter by now....right? I mean, after eight pages, we have to have someone you think is suspicious for something other than nonvoting.Dragon Phoenix wrote:Unvote jalyn
vote spectrumvoid
Switching to the next non-voter.