I am inclined to trust that claim.
Now we go for CES, yes?
Also,
As uncomfortable as I am with claimed vigs who fire N1 being left alive, I do find your argument here very compelling.Seol wrote:That does actually make sense, and if it's a lie, it's aNocmen wrote:I wasn't paying attention when I read my role. After the crash, I went and reread everything I had to not get my roles in each game confused after a week hiatus or so. That's all I can really say to my past thought, poor reading comprehension made me take the chance that did pay out.veryclever one. Furthermore, it only makes sense if you are a vig, not an SK.
unvote.
Is that because they're likely to be SKs, or as a metagame pressure to stop vigs firing night 0 to weaken vig claims for SKs who fire night 0?Thesp wrote:As uncomfortable as I am with claimed vigs who fire N1 being left alive, I do find your argument here very compelling.
I'll explain my reasoning in a bit more detail then.Coron wrote:...that is the most lame excuse in the world as far as I'm concerned, a SK who wanted to claim vig would claim that most likely. I don't really understand all the unvoting, heck I was about to place my vote there.
The former. There seems to be an unnatural tendency among players to think that the surest way to pass by as a townie when SK is to claim to be a vig. Regardless, your argument on his claim is top-notch and very compelling.Seol wrote:Is that because they're likely to be SKs, or as a metagame pressure to stop vigs firing night 0 to weaken vig claims for SKs who fire night 0?Thesp wrote:As uncomfortable as I am with claimed vigs who fire N1 being left alive, I do find your argument here very compelling.
Why?ThAdmiral wrote:So now we have to decide who he is to kill tonight, or if indeed that is necessary.
Two reasons:Thesp wrote:Why?ThAdmiral wrote:So now we have to decide who he is to kill tonight, or if indeed that is necessary.FOS: ThAdmiral.
I disagree, I think he should kill as he sees fit, and I don't want him revealing who he will kill.ThAdmiral wrote:Two reasons:Thesp wrote:Why?ThAdmiral wrote:So now we have to decide who he is to kill tonight, or if indeed that is necessary.FOS: ThAdmiral.
1. the town can have two lynches
2. if he is a serial killer then he would be working for town anyway.
I would be happy if he didn't hit anyone tonight. We don't have any strong leads on anyone and should really only be looking to go for a kill if there's a cop investigation or something really suspicious in the next few days.
That is dangerous because there is still the remote possibility he's not a vig as was claimed.Thesp wrote:I disagree, I think he should kill as he sees fit, and I don't want him revealing who he will kill.ThAdmiral wrote:Two reasons:Thesp wrote:Why?ThAdmiral wrote:So now we have to decide who he is to kill tonight, or if indeed that is necessary.FOS: ThAdmiral.
1. the town can have two lynches
2. if he is a serial killer then he would be working for town anyway.
I would be happy if he didn't hit anyone tonight. We don't have any strong leads on anyone and should really only be looking to go for a kill if there's a cop investigation or something really suspicious in the next few days.
How else will we find out if he's the Serial Killer or not? Also, why help out the mafia? I bet they'd love to know who he's going to kill. Also, won't the alignment of the lynched play some role in the decision?Dagger wrote:That is dangerous because there is still the remote possibility he's not a vig as was claimed.