YagamiLight wrote:YogurtBandit wrote:I claimed because there was a bandwagon on me.
You say here that you claimed on prupose, but on page 7 post 159 you say...
YogurtBandit wrote:Well, I was planning on claiming later, but I guess I kind of did.<snip>
I'm surprised no one else noticed this, given that he is changeing his story from saying, "well I didn't really mean to tell you guys that," to, "yeah, I did that because of the band wagon on me."
Iiiinnnnnnteresting. Interesting, indeed.
Back to the thread, to look over YB's posts, with this in mind. I think Adel has a good suggestion - reviewing the thread, but not necessarily bandwagoning him.
Hm. His first 5 posts are random-vote followed by 4 fluff posts.
I don't like his interaction with ChaosOmega re: Nekka-Lucifer. A second vote on someone on page 1 is hardly a "bandwagon", and then removes his vote on N-L (who had 2 votes) to place a vote on ChaosOmega (bringing him to 2 votes). He says his "had a reason". Not much of one.
He spends some time trying to make "voting without a reason" into a scumtell.
He says, after Adel's vote-diagram-thingy that the votes all "look like noise".
So...if they look like noise, why was CO's vote for N-L so significant?
He asks for a "summary of the day". I still don't like that.
He later on set up the possibility for 2 Cops / 2 Docs. Hm...I dunno. He could easily have been paving the way for his cop-claim here, removing peoples' suspicion of him when he did claim.
A contradiction:
Post 121, he says that "Guardian never claimed cop". Yet, in his
Very next post, he says Guardian
must be scum for
claiming cop so early!
So which is it - did he claim cop or did he NOT claim cop???
Next he says he believes Guardian is - no, wait, I'll give you his exact words, because this is inherently contradictory and I want y'all to have the contradiction straight from him:
Im investigating someone else, some one I think is Scummy.I do think you are, but I also think you are Cop
I checked the Wiki, on the "Cop" role. There's nothing in there that indicates that COP can also be SCUM.
Then comes the other contradictory post, saying he claimed because there was a bandwagon on him. No, he didn't. He soft-claimed...sorta...but didn't intend to...but maybe he did...
And fercryinoutloud, claiming at Lynch-3?
In sum:
Problems / contradictions I've found with YB's posts:
1) He doesn't like ChaosOmega putting a second vote on someone, yet he turns around and does it.
2) Says that Guardian never claimed cop, then says in his next post that Guardian claimed cop.
3) Says he thinks Guardian is scum, but also that Guardian is Cop.
4) He initially says he didn't intend to claim, but later says he actually DID intend to claim because he had a bandwagon on him.
Don't like it. I don't like it at all. And all this contradiction makes me want to vote YOU more than Nano"no, really, I'm ALWAYS reading the thread but I'm not finding anything really important enough to comment on"sauromo, so
unvote: Nanosauromo
FoS: YogurtBandit
(FoS-not-vote because of Adel's request. I don't want this to turn into a mindless bandwagon, I want to wait and think about it.)