dylan41985 wrote:My initial nomination and mistakes (regardless of if you think I'm lying or not) are irrelevant at this point because I am the person challenged by Sparks.
What? If we're trying to figure out who was the most suspicious, then how are you're "mistakes" irrelevent"
But ask yourself this: Was it really fair for Sparks to challenge me this early? What have I done to him? Why was he so eager to challenge me? Isn't that action more suspicious that my behavior?
Are you paying attention to this game?
If someone didn't challange someone else on the 10'th, then we could have had a random challange on the 11'th, which would have been bad. And several people made clear that they wanted Sparks to challange someone or they were going to challange him themselves, so instead, he challanged a suspicious looking person.
I'd expect him to act that way no matter what his allignment was, personally.
My theory is that Sparks is scum and anyone voting to save him is
possibly
Spark's secret scum buddy.
My theory is that your theory is totally meaningless. Sparks may be scum, you may be scum, or both of you may be scum in different groups. If you want to survive, you're going to have to do better then that.
Fonz, I really don't know how else to convince you but to say that later in the game you won't regret keeping me here. I can promise you that.
If you want to live, don't promise to contribute more later, contribute more NOW. Like, an explinaiton of why Spark's actions would be more likely to be committed by a scum then by a town, or a discription with reasons of who else you think is suspicious, or a better explination for your own actions.
Plus, I'm a vulnerable target for future rounds.
Why would that be a reason to keep you alive?
I want us to win just for Yos' inevitable rant alone. -CrashTextDummie