In post 969, Mathdino wrote:Do I need to mention how bad the above post is?
Beetles and juice, beetle juice.
Hello mathdino,
Are you a math major??
In post 969, Mathdino wrote:Do I need to mention how bad the above post is?
In post 985, istott wrote:Wow, such juxtaposition of tone.
P.edit: keep yelling and screaming, you mean?
Damn straight. Took me basically two hours to do three VCs. Daystart VCs take more time to make than late-day VCs, I had to actually create the new format and get used to it which took a lotta typing, and the format's new to me meaning my speed will increase with practice, but it's still a ton of work.In post 991, Sonic Boom wrote:I appreciate the work that Mastina puts into her vote counts c:
It is a lot of effort!!!!
In post 904, Sonic Boom wrote:Has anybody heard of a scum jailkeeper? I have!
In post 916, istott wrote:In post 912, istott wrote:ProHawk wrote:I'm more interested in your read on me ISTOTT
Hmmmmm, I'm not sure. I need to refresh myself on the cases against you, but I just looked at your ISO, and there weren't any blatant Scumtells.
I do have something to ask of you though.How would you (without any bias) describe the case against you?
This goes formathdinotoo.
Actually, everyone (who has been accused of being scum) please answer this. It could be useful.
Thanks for your answer, prohawk.
In post 922, ika wrote:from what i recall the reason why i was being called scum was really on these points:
-inconsistency
-generally being scummy
thats what i can recall offhand.
In post 937, Bulbazak wrote:I do. Claiming a guilty on Mollie and then turning around to say that he must be insane is not a pro-scum move. It essentially turns him into policy lynch material, which is bad for a scum wincon. He'd have been better off claiming an innocent on a town player and leaving sanity ambiguous. The only way this makes sense for Sonic-scum is if you also believe Mollie is scum, which you've given zero indication.
Plus, I believe Sonic-town would investigate Mollie for those reasons.