In post 280, Garmr wrote:Dave I remember you posting things more indepth and being a little more active are you busy or has your meta changed. Is there a reason?
Was that Masquerade or a later game? Work got a lot busier, for the most part.
In post 280, Garmr wrote:Dave I remember you posting things more indepth and being a little more active are you busy or has your meta changed. Is there a reason?
In post 297, Annadog40 wrote:In post 276, dragonspawn wrote:Ill give you some reads I'm still formulating.
Town reads
Boon - cause he is still awesome. And it just feels like a town boon game so far.
This isn't very convincing to me.
Klingon - mostly because I'd be expecting her to be more involved if she was scum. That can change though.
Anna - slight scum read because she hasn't really done much other than vote for me because Dragon rhymes with wagon. I'd be expecting a bit more by now.
Hmm . . So Klingon lack of involvement makes her town read while mine makes me slight scum read?
In post 300, Prolapsed Brain wrote:I'm not on any wagon. Why are you not paying attention?
In post 307, Bellaphant wrote:
PB's iso is not giving me any positive feelings, though. He's not sharing information, and with 12 posts I feel I should know -something- about his read on the game, and I don't.
VOTE: PB
In post 318, TheCow wrote:
Prolapsed needs to post more. Do any players here have experience with them? They would be better of reading them.
In any case, kind of leaning scum at this point, just based on tone and content alone.
In post 307, Bellaphant wrote:I likewhat FA is doing.
@BBT, I can kinda see what Gamr is saying about dragon -I feel likehe's not looking any deeper at the game and it'sfrustrating to me.
In terms of Soze, his Isoconfusesme. Some of itseemsreally genuine and town-minded, some of it is just...noisy and the discussion with mykdoesn't fill me with town-vibesIt might be a style thing.
PB's iso is not giving me anypositive feelings, though. He's not sharing information, and with 12 postsI feelI should know -something- about his read on the game, and I don't.
VOTE: PB
In post 305, FA_Q2 wrote:In post 297, Annadog40 wrote:
In post 276, dragonspawn wrote:
Klingon - mostly because I'd be expecting her to be more involved if she was scum. That can change though.
In post 276, dragonspawn wrote:
Anna - slight scum read because she hasn't really done much other than vote for me because Dragon rhymes with wagon. I'd be expecting a bit more by now.
Hmm . . So Klingon lack of involvement makes her town read while mine makes me slight scum read?
In post 308, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
Can you explain this? Hoping for something substantial from your slot soon...
In post 287, Keyser Söze wrote:In post 286, mykonian wrote:bullshit. You just want something you can argue with. Others are interested in my sincerity, you aren't.
No - I don't like empty scum-reads/vote. I'd prefer to hear the logic/sincerity behind them. This will help me with my read on you.
In post 334, mykonian wrote:curious how you don't give a shit about the similar read I have on duppin.
In post 13, mykonian wrote:vote duppin
not even rvs, his post was scummy. Aeronaut (sorry babe) is also scummy. Hmm.
In post 283, mykonian wrote:duppin or soze. Take your pick!
In post 338, duppin wrote:I find the timing of your unvote curious. Care to explain why?
In post 159, Keyser Söze wrote:You were the only person to take a different angle on voting on dragonspawn's wagon. This intrigues me:[I thought it was an opportunistic vote (with added reachy reason) on the Dragonspawn wagon]
VOTE: Shazam
In post 161, Keyser Söze wrote:I like your earlier point.
Do you still stand by your first reason for voting dragonspawn? Or has his defensive-reactions added to your scum-read of him?
I will keep my vote on you for now, as I have an unnerving worry about your quick reply to my vote. If you are town, I hope you understand.[I thought his quick reply to my vote on him was very suspicious. I believe it is scummy behaviour to 'spring into life' when the focus/vote is on you]
In post 329, Shazam wrote:This is poor. If you expect anyone to agree with you about who to vote, talk about more than your feelings. If you don't expect anyone to agree with you, why are you doing it?[Shazam, challenging Bellaphant on her own convictions and feelings]
I don't like the PB wagon because it looks like a lurker wagon, and I generally don't like D1 lurker wagons. Those are for later days when the full body of their lurker posting can give you some info.[Publicly announcing his thoughts on Prolapsed Brain's current wagon.Defence noted.]
In post 289, Shazam wrote:You explained yourself how it's a misrep. There's a difference between me saying a) "defensiveness is scummy" and b) "dragon's kind of defensiveness is scummy". I clearly said b), he asked why I said a). I said that was a misrep and explained why, then restated b) in different words. He replied by saying he didn't misrep me and that a) wasn't true (as if that was somehow a counterargument).[Firm stand on his understanding of his 'alignment indicative defense' with Aeronaut]
@all
I understand that there are some things that you wish to keep to yourselves even as town in terms of reads. But I'm seeing too much of it going on. At the very least, if you have something like this, don't bother mentioning it, and don't use it as a reason for voting someone. Find a reason that you're willing to explain to us, so that we can see why you're reading people the way you are. In other words, once you get this tell that you won't explain, iso the guy and find something you're willing to talk about.[An invitation for constructive scum-hunting behaviour. Playing the possible 'pro-town card' - but I like his attitude.]
In post 234, Shazam wrote:This question is such a blatant misrep that I almost want to vote you. You chopped off the context, and even in that one sentence you quoted, there is the phrase "this kind" that you just threw out the window with your question. If you are asking why a kind of paranoid defensiveness that causes a player to misread posts and think they're more against him than they really are is anti-town...I think it's pretty obvious. It hurts the town when someone misinterprets what everyone else is saying and gets super defensive about it because it is a) deceptive b) illogical and c) often seen as scummy. In this case, I do see it as scummy, which means it's at least anti-town if he's actually town.[A full explanation of his belief about 'paranoid defensiveness', challenging BlueBloodedToffee's different view of defensive play]
Yet another misinterpretation of a post because he can't see past people being against him.
In post 99, Shazam wrote:
Thou shalt not take my name in vain.
dragonspawn wrote:Making a note of what people do is defensive?
This post is, anyway.
dragonspawn wrote:Anna isn't easy to read because she is still a newb. She could be scum but not willing to just assume so and I see no reason to rush anything.
I think this is a response to post 90. If I'm right, you're reading it wrong and I'm not sure what to make of that.
VOTE: dragonspawn
In post 345, RadiantCowbells wrote:I like big cakes and I cannot lie
no brother can deny
when a girl comes in with some nitty gritty dessert
and some whipped cream doesn't hurt
In post 346, Bellaphant wrote:@myko, who is the one townie?
@Shazam, why are you attacking what is basically a play-style thing? It doesn't look like you've bothered to work out if it's anything to do with alignment, and it's no different to a bunch of people's reads. Why chose to take apart that post, in 14 pages?