In post 481, TheWorst wrote:AAAAAA I got stuff to do, cutting this post a bit short. well, it's already a wall to catch up/respond with, but whatever.
Just want to note first of all, this is important.
I provided my stances on the "inactive" "low content" players first, since they rarely post in the first place and I felt as though since that's who everyone focuses on, I decided I may as well give my own perspective on them. Still wanted to provoke them to talk. I prefer to question and engage others who actually post because you see, interactions are important D1, but I didn't have enough time to, as shown above.
In post 511, catboi wrote:
The fact is here he's really only hitting low-content players who have been voted or at least fos'd by people in this game. I'm going to go out on a slightly crazy limb here and say I think this is a scumtell, but I don't really know why. I think I've been hit for it before in the past, and people have pointed it out to me. I think, in part, it shows a person isn't legitimately scumhunting and is just following along with the crowd. A town player should be looking at everyone and trying to read them, but for scum it's more convenient to just look at the popular wagons. Again this isn't a great explanation but I'd swear by the fact that someone has told me this, I just don't remember the exact reasoning it's bad.
I'm glad that you're willing to lynch me D1 based on a tell you yourself are not even sure of. I didn't follow the crowd, if I did I wouldn't have kept my vote on Veegee and said Performer is scummy as fuck. My post wasn't even done, but I've said that already. The only actual case I've seen you do is on me (inherently wrong, so no brownie points), maybe AJ that was much lighter though, everyone else has gotten small comments here or there.
Not only that, but then I see you give others the benefit of the doubt, E.G. Zakk who doesn't even try, and Veegee, who posts minimum anything, and that bugs me. Basically, I'd look less scummy to you if I didn't post than actually trying to keep up with the game, trying to engage others, put effort? What sense does that make?
In post 511, catboi wrote:
Added to that, it's really pretty useless commentary! again, voting a lurky player for "pressure" is a meaningless token gesture for scum that is done to attempt to look town while taking on really no risk at all. Also pretty lame to be pressing veegee for content when he's offered up essentially none himself, I think. It's such a weak cop-out for a vote. DOn't see any reasoning behind him asking veegee about faq2 or performer except that they were also getting wagoned. the sentence on zakk is useless! All he says is thathe hasn't posted much! No kidding, anyone could see that from looking at the activity overview! Worst doesn't bother to say whether he finds it suspicious, just essentially goes to restate the obvious. It's non-analysis posing as commentary. The Performer "read" is just, he's annoying but has "bits and pieces of insight" (where? what? who knows) and he's not scummy but you can pressure him and maybe I'll vote him later - it's a total non-stance. Doesn't really manage to say anything about performer at all. Last bit not much better, just saying fa_q2 is bad because he "ignored the reasons against him", whatever that means. It just feels like cheap analysis. COuld I see a town player thinking this? I guess, but the way he expresses it feels off. It's not really new or insightful, just kind of piggybacking on another guy that's been pressured.
It feels like you'e more refusing to
understand
my post rather than analyze it. If you couldn't tell from the post, I basically don't want a lynch now and I'm catching up. I want to talk. Which I've said and done before.
Is that anti-town? Is that scummy? Honestly?
In post 511, catboi wrote:
worst referenced his meta, the only remotely recent meta on him is
Mini 1705, and the difference is night and day - there he pretty quickly delves into actual analysis and makes legitimate attempts at scumhunting. in 59 there's a press on something he finds suspicious, then he starts asking questions with a point, drops meta-analysis on a player he doesn't see doing much (bacde) - there's a decent deal of interrogation and accusation going on there. He doesn't give reads for a while but not hard to see honest scumhunting in the questioning, trying to figure out people's reasoning and the like. There's really none of that here and most of what he's said has been constructed seemingly in an effort to avoid riling anyone up. The fact that he didn't bother to look into veegee's meta is also pretty bad, suggests here he's more concerned with simply pushing the easy lynch rather than investigating if he's making a vote based on playstyle.
yeah guess what? If you saw the game, you'd notice it was
much
slower game relatively where I had more time (didn't have school either) to chew and dissect other posts. I posted once a day for the most part besides the first few days, which is the same as now and has been to my detriment so far. I didn't tend to give my reads, as you saw. The thing on Bacde was my frustration since he was posting nonsensically on that game, meanwhile he was posting seriously in other games. And it didn't lead to anything, 'cause he wasn't scum. Ask
Banana
, he can back me up on this meta.
In this game, I've felt the urge to catch up constantly since it's been like literally 100 posts a day. Not even kidding, do the math. 5 days 500 posts.
AND WHO SAYS I'M PUSHING THE EASY LYNCH? I don't want Veegee lynched right now. The only way you could get this impression is from AJ's vote, and he voted second. I voted Veegee first, and that was something they call a "pressure vote".
In post 481, TheWorst wrote:Keeping my vote on Veegee, still want more from him. Idc if he's an "easy" wagon,
I put my vote on him
not to lynch
, but to have conversation.
First you say
I'm too weak on Veegee
, then you say
I'm "pushing the easy lynch"
. What? Which is it? Stick to one story if you want to try to make me look scummy, because to me it seems that's your only goal so far is tunneling me.
There's 9 days left. Would it be more beneficial to lynch now, or to lynch later? Maybe I'm wrong for wanting to talk some more, after all "talking some more" for me meant 100 posts more to look over. I can try to adapt.
I'll continue posting, since that was a wall and in response to one person, still need to address some stuff and engage some more.
