This was a 'spin' you put on Nekka's post. I agree that it isn't a good play to ask other people to give you reasons for deciding whether a player is scum or not. But perhaps that is as far as Nekka was going. I don't believe there was anything in his post that was was inherently scummy, but you presented it as if it was.Sephiroth wrote:Though your attempt to get a gift wrapped reason to jump on a (dying) wagon is noted.
About SilverPhoenix:
Phoenix's post was more about TinVision than dusterhan. Seen in a certain light, you could say that it was defending dustrehan, but to me that seems like a stretch.Sephiroth wrote:Likewise, SP's defense of Dusterhan is noted. This post is suspect, because you call a random vote absurd.
I should admit that I may have read the line about Phoenix calling a 'random vote absurd' incorrectly. I didn't notice that Phoenix had refered to Tin's vote as 'random' in his post. Regardless, your framing of this is still questionable. My reading of Phoenix's post saw his criticism of Tin's vote revolving not around it being random, but it's 'absurd' reasoning. I think this was clear enough.
In all cases, Sephiroth, you appear to be presenting the posts in a manner that makes them more suspicious than they really are.