Are you.... fucking stupid? Or just scum? I'm not even going to dignify that with an rebuttal. Just because you want to say something "isn't a thing" doesn't make it true lmfao....
Also Firebringer may be an obnoxious moron but that doesn't mean he's scum.
Ranger's latest posts are a lot better then her previous ones. Firebringer's have only gotten worse.
Playing well as town is about coordinating with the rest of the town to lynch whichever of your scumreads that you can lynch. It's not about sitting on a vanity wagon and hoping it goes through. You've clearly been playing mafia long enough to know this.
In post 1445, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:
There's already a player at L-2 (Ythan). There are 3 other wagons, with a total of 6 players for you to "urge to choose a wagon. Even excluding your preferred wagon, that's still 3 - besides ranger, me and flubber. But you don't bother talking to either me or flubber. Just Ranger.
So.... yeah. That's coaching, as opposed to encouraging people to consolidate.
First note that Ythan is at L-1. There's an error in the VC.
1426 - I pushed the person with no vote at 17 hours
1440 - I pushed the person with a lone vote at 12 hours.
See the progression?
If you and flubber are still on a 2-person wagon in a few hours, yes, I'll push you as well.
In post 1453, OceanWind wrote:Ranger's latest posts are a lot better then her previous ones. Firebringer's have only gotten worse.
Playing well as town is about coordinating with the rest of the town to lynch whichever of your scumreads that you can lynch. It's not about sitting on a vanity wagon and hoping it goes through. You've clearly been playing mafia long enough to know this.
So you're telling me there was zero support for a Ranger lynch? Despite screaming for his head for two days? You're not even going to bother pushing your strongest scumread?
Because... I'm pretty sure there was plenty of support, but the moment interest in Firebringer came up, you switched. That tells me that your interest in lynching Ranger isn't as strong as you'd like us all to believe it is.
In post 1448, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:
3) Failing to have any real reads, e.g. supposedly scumreading Marge on D1 but not interacting with her at all, whatsoever.
Wow, now you're reaching to the point of outright, demonstrable lies.
In post 1455, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:So you're telling me there was zero support for a Ranger lynch? Despite screaming for his head for two days? You're not even going to bother pushing your strongest scumread?
Because... I'm pretty sure there was plenty of support, but the moment interest in Firebringer came up, you switched. That tells me that your interest in lynching Ranger isn't as strong as you'd like us all to believe it is.
The Ranger wagon wasn't taking off. Ranger's latest posts were a lot better than her earlier ones which made me second guess my read and not want to pursue her at that time.
I've never "screamed for Ranger's head." That was me explaining to a reading-comprehension disabled Flubbernugget over and over again why I thought Ranger's whiteknighting was scummy because he was that type of player who needed it explained again and again.
In post 1450, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:
Interesting. So it's more about the opportunity to lynch, and less about actually scumreading someone?
There's more than one scum, and people do or should have more than one scum read. If deadline's approaching, your top scum read doesn't have a viable wagon, but your second or third scum read does have a wagon going, you move your vote. I daresay someone does this in 99% of mafia games. You're so caught up in your tunnel vision conf bias that you're completely misinterpreting really common practices.
p-edit: Yeah but that's where skill comes into play - being able to tell the difference.
p-edit: Ocean's response to your nonsense was pretty good, Titus. You always go "I caught scum" and it's annoying to people who aren't actually scum. I've been on the receiving end of it and it makes me want to bitchslap you, and I saw the same reaction from Ocean.
p-edit: Kop kop. Sorry kop I've got a honey all my own already
I'm pretty sure you should have actually read the link:
UPDATE: After further analysis, Tarhalindur has determined that the Chainsaw Defense is only trustworthy once the player defended has been revealed to be group scum (once the player defended is proved to be Mafia, any player that used Chainsaw Defense on the dead scum should be scrutinized). Otherwise, it is a null tell.
I'm pretty sure you should have actually read the link:
UPDATE: After further analysis, Tarhalindur has determined that the Chainsaw Defense is only trustworthy once the player defended has been revealed to be group scum (once the player defended is proved to be Mafia, any player that used Chainsaw Defense on the dead scum should be scrutinized). Otherwise, it is a null tell.
Awesome. So let's flip Ocean and see what happens.
p-edit: Yeah but that's where skill comes into play - being able to tell the difference.
p-edit:
Ocean's response to your nonsense was pretty good, Titus. You always go "I caught scum" and it's annoying to people who aren't actually scum. I've been on the receiving end of it and it makes me want to bitchslap you, and I saw the same reaction from Ocean.
p-edit: Kop kop. Sorry kop I've got a honey all my own already