YogurtBandit[3](Samruc, Lemming1607, Sir Tornado)
Sir Tornado[3](Shanba, Crub, Simenon)
Lemming1607[2](Sammich, Per)
Crub[1](Jex)
Khelvaster[1](EmpTyger)
Not Voting[1](YogurtBandit)
I think this was very bad timing on Shanba's part:What? You were one of the earliest proponents of starting a bandwagon on Yogurt. Now that's it at lynch -1, you're unhappy about your bandwagon?
If Shanba's case on YB was weak, I find it inconsistant to drop out of a lynch -1 situation at this time.The case there was on YB was weak. I voted for him and I admit that. Why, therefore, is this wagon growing this quickly and is this big? Unhappy bout that.unvote vote lemming
I don't think YB is scum, the bandwagon is purely WIFOM, and I don't think rushing a BW lynch will help us at the moment.So, a YB lynch is a policy lynch as far as I am concerned.
This I can fully agree with. However, in the next post EmpTyger is really overdoing the "I'm fully innocent" bit...I completely agree about this. I wasn’t advocating doing something based on what the mafia would or wouldn’t do. Rather, I was defending myself against your “what have you done for us” accusation. Because I’m not got to lurk quietly around because it’s only page X and day Y. I’m not going to assume that I’ll be around to share my thoughts on a later day. If I see something suspicious, I’m going to state it.
How does join dates affect the outcome of the game? I don't like how you're playing the paranoid card here, because your expectations seem WIFOM.Now, examine the join dates of the players of this game. Mine is by far the earliest. So, barring replacement shenanigans, I expect to be a high profile target. I think there is a good chance I will not be alive D2. So if I want any chance of affecting the game, I’m going to have to do it *now*.
Yup. Not every bandwagon has the intention of lynching, like not every vote. Besides, the wagon was moving way too quickly.Sammich wrote:FOS: Shanba
Shanba, like Lemming pointed out in this post:What? You were one of the earliest proponents of starting a bandwagon on Yogurt. Now that's it at lynch -1, you're unhappy about your bandwagon?
Um, if I think the wagon is weak, it's inconsistent to unvote? How do you twist logic to make that work :S.I think this was very bad timing on Shanba's part:If Shanba's case on YB was weak, I find it inconsistant to drop out of a lynch -1 situation at this time.The case there was on YB was weak. I voted for him and I admit that. Why, therefore, is this wagon growing this quickly and is this big? Unhappy bout that.unvote vote lemming
I wasn't twisting logic, not at all.Um, if I think the wagon is weak, it's inconsistent to unvote? How do you twist logic to make that work :S.
I don't see the jokevote phase that way. It's just a way to get people to start talking before we get into discussion of the format. I would say you were right about distraction if I had gone BACK to the jokevote phase after we started discussing mechanics and real votes started going everywhere.Per wrote:The first phase is the random/joke voting phase. It’s one of the weirdest random voting stages I have ever seen (not that I’m very experienced, but anyway). I say big WTF? to lemming and Shanba. Lemming, because he seemed to be trying very hard to distract everyone from this game.
Actually it did start discussion...in fact about 3 pages of it or so.Per wrote: I also note a bandwagon on YB for no reason at all, probably to start discussion except it didn’t really start any discussion.
I agreePer wrote: I also don’t like Crub’s first post, just jumping on the wagon without making any other comments.
Personally I find lurking scummy. To me it looks like he "gave up" after being outted. Why would someone who is innocent do that? Although I do admit that I'm used to 3 day time limit on games and 10 pages in 12 hour games, so the slow pace is a little different to me and I'm trying to adjust.Per wrote: Lemming puts YB at -1 now and I really can’t believe it. You can pressure a lurker with a couple of votes to get him to post, but if the lurker persists, you don’t lynch him: you ask for him to be prodded and then replaced. Which Lemming obviously knows because he has asked for a prod on me in the same post.
Ah, I get you now. I wondered how you thought unvoting was scummy in that situation, it didn't occur to me that it was unvoting so late that you were querying.Sammich wrote:I wasn't twisting logic, not at all.Um, if I think the wagon is weak, it's inconsistent to unvote? How do you twist logic to make that work :S.
Did you just recently realize your case against YB was bad and pull out? That would make sense.
But I didn't get the point of unvoting so late.
I didn't give him support ... I just said I could see where he was coming from. YB can be very detrimental to town as town.ChaosOmega wrote: Also, I didn't like the support you gave to Sir Tornado in regards to his YogurtBandit policy lynch. While I'm on the subject,FOS: Sir Tornado. I agree that it's hard to read him, and he does need to post more, but you were pushing for a lynch very early. Even if he is scum, let him talk a bit first.