Open 42 - Friends and Enemies - (Game Over) before 495

[Sir Tornado]

Mod Edit: Vote Count

Crub[4](Jex, ChaosOmega, Simenon, Sammich)
Simenon[2](Crub, Lemming1607)
Sir Tornado[1](Shanba)
Lemming1607[1](Per)


Not Voting[3](AlSleet, Samruc, Sir Tornado)

I'll explain my reasoning tomorrow.

FYI: Sim never said he agrees with other people. Check again.

[Simenon]

Lemming, a simple question: Do you think that taking into account my previous statements to SirTornado, and the fact that all of my bandwagoning has been done in the same method and same number of votes, my bandwagoning is just a scummy coincidence?

[Sir Tornado]

Simenon... is your post 176 suggesting some sort of "too scummy to be scum" argument?

[Simenon]

No, I'm asking whether there may be other reasons for someone to bandwagon methodically.

I don't think methodical bandwagoning is scummy, so no, I'm not suggesting that.

[Sammich]

No, I'm asking whether there may be other reasons for someone to bandwagon methodically.

I don't think methodical bandwagoning is scummy, so no, I'm not suggesting that.

You still didn't answer meh question.
What do you mean by "Lemming can be next"?

[AlSleet]

No, I'm asking whether there may be other reasons for someone to bandwagon methodically.

I don't think methodical bandwagoning is scummy, so no, I'm not suggesting that.

You still didn't answer meh question.
What do you mean by "Lemming can be next"?

He wants to kill lemming. The only reason being that lemmin seemingly is against him. I don't like that kind of play and Simenon is probably the one I am most suspicious of.

[Simenon]

He wants to kill lemming

Yup. But only after we kill Crub.

[Lemming1607]

No, I'm asking whether there may be other reasons for someone to bandwagon methodically.

I don't think methodical bandwagoning is scummy, so no, I'm not suggesting that.

I do. And no I don't see a reason to vote people without any reasons, and they be serious votes. Worst yet, you come out and say you're not going to tell us your reasons, and you have some type of "mysterious" reasoning. Sounds like you're lazy

[Simenon]

Answer the question, please.

[Simenon]

Also, post 182 puts so many words in my mouth it makes me wonder why we even bother listening to lemming.

But go on.

[Crub]

He wants to kill lemming

Yup. But only after we kill Crub.

It's a pity that it'll be you getting lynched for your un-explained bandwagoning

[Lemming1607]

No, I'm asking whether there may be other reasons for someone to bandwagon methodically.

I don't think methodical bandwagoning is scummy, so no, I'm not suggesting that.

Here is your reasoning. I think bandwagoning without reason is scummy. You can call it "methodically" I call it "without reason." There I answered your question. Now explain why you're voting people with no reasoning or "methodically."

[Simenon]

Hi lemming!

I see you there!

This is the third time I have asked you to answer my question. I know this might be overload (lord knows if you would be able to do two at a time), but why do you insist on ignoring it?

[Samruc]

Crub: Adds no suspicions at all except for a vote at Sir T. I can't tell why this vote was placed. He didn't talk Sir T out of policy lynching, rather "can empathise with Sir T over it". Then he shrugs off Jex's comment, instead of trying to answer.

FoS: Crub

Jex has got a bone to pick with me because I random bandwagon'ed someone to L-2 during the random voting stage, and then OMGUS'ed her for voting me for it

And she says I was being opportunistic and lurking :0

What more do you want me to say?

Get some more votes on me so you can lynch Simenon tomorrow when I turn up town

unvote, vote simenon

Crub is defending very poorly - if he is indeed a townie he shouldn't be *asking* for votes, he should be giving us reasons not to vote him.

And I don't "want you to say" anything, I want you to look for scum and think.

[Lemming1607]

Hi lemming!

I see you there!

This is the third time I have asked you to answer my question. I know this might be overload (lord knows if you would be able to do two at a time), but why do you insist on ignoring it?

How about you repeat your question then because I am under the presumption that I answered it

[Lemming1607]

And also Simenon I don't appreciate your tone. This is just a game after all, and obviously you're not being clear. Maybe if you actually put some effort into what you write you wouldn't have to ask three times maybe?

[Jex]

He wants to kill lemming

Yup. But only after we kill Crub.

It's a pity that it'll be you getting lynched for your un-explained bandwagoning

Seriously? Do you really want to die?

Simenon may have unexplained votes, but Crub has had the lamest responses. All he does is say, "shame you'll have to die when I turn up town" and other such similar statements. He wreaks of scum.

[Sammich]

FOS: Simenon

I don't see why Lemming should be next.
Why are we planning through the future, anyway? Nobody's been lynched yet.

[Simenon]

Post 182 is not an answer to this:

Do you think that taking into account my previous statements to SirTornado, and the fact that all of my bandwagoning has been done in the same method and same number of votes, my bandwagoning is just a scummy coincidence?

Maybe if you actually put some effort into what you write you wouldn't have to ask three times maybe

He got me!

[Crub]

He wants to kill lemming

Yup. But only after we kill Crub.

It's a pity that it'll be you getting lynched for your un-explained bandwagoning

Seriously? Do you really want to die?

Simenon may have unexplained votes, but Crub has had the lamest responses. All he does is say, "shame you'll have to die when I turn up town" and other such similar statements. He wreaks of scum.

Jex! What is your case on me?

You didn't like that fact that I L-2'd someone for no reason but random. If you can't get past the fact that I did that and therefore think I'm scum how am I supposed to defend myself to that. All I'm saying is, Yes I made a random L-2 vote, theres nothing I can to say to take it back if you won't give up on it, I don't mind dieing in the hopes that town will see sense and lynch the easy bandwagon'ers like Simenon tomorrow.

2 things can happen :
a) you accept that I did what I did and we move on.
b) I get lynched, and hopefully you can examine my bandwagon tomorrow.

In response to your question :
I do not mind dieing safe in the knowledge that maybe the rest of town, is actually paying attention to who is jumping on the easy bandwagon, so we get a good scum lynch tomorrow.

[Lemming1607]

Post 182 is not an answer to this:

Do you think that taking into account my previous statements to SirTornado, and the fact that all of my bandwagoning has been done in the same method and same number of votes, my bandwagoning is just a scummy coincidence?

Hey! I Know! Maybe instead of answering my question with a stupid cryptic question, you could actually come out and answer my question instead of making me do more work because you don't want to defend yourself, revealing your scumminess!

For reference, post 164 is where you never defend yourself against what I said.

You're not Socrates. Just answer the question. Why all the cryptic questions?

[AlSleet]

He wants to kill lemming

Yup. But only after we kill Crub.

It's a pity that it'll be you getting lynched for your un-explained bandwagoning

Seriously? Do you really want to die?

Simenon may have unexplained votes, but Crub has had the lamest responses. All he does is say, "shame you'll have to die when I turn up town" and other such similar statements. He wreaks of scum.

Yeah, that totally blows away "answer my question." I see double standards in defending from you and I don't like it.

[Simenon]

An answer to my question will tell me from what angle I should approach defending myself. I'm trying to understand where you are coming from better before I commit to a defense.

I don't think my question is cryptic either.

[Lemming1607]

An answer to my question will tell me from what angle I should approach defending myself. I'm trying to understand where you are coming from better before I commit to a defense.

I don't think my question is cryptic either.

Sorry that's not how it works. You see what you're trying to do is guide me into believing something. Whatever answer I give, allows you to properly respond to the situation. I'm not going to give you that chance. That's not how I roll yo.

I see your game, and it's like you believe you're smarter than everyone else and need to lead us to find out "inner selves" through questions. I don't play that game. I'm going to keep my vote on you until you answer the question, instead of trying to figure out what answer will satisfy me and say that.

[Jex]

I have extremely limited internet access over the next week or so while I'm moving. I'll try to stay up on the game during that time.