NY 193 : Werewolf Mania (GAME OVER- TOWN WIN)

Ricastle · Post Post #375 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:32 am

Silver, what's the difference between that scumgame of ika's you linked and here?

Golden Robster · Post Post #376 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:33 am

Okay, I'm here. It seems shit has happened.

Almost50 · Post Post #377 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:34 am

In post 336, Nero Cain wrote:dO NOT CC ika.

I second that.

Nero Cain · Post Post #378 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:34 am

In post 373, BlackStar wrote:I already voted for him.

good

my vote is not moving from Ika. Though I'd also be up for a force replace.

Almost50 · Post Post #379 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:35 am

In post 342, RadiantCowbells wrote:Gimme a sec I'm in classes for the next 6 hours.

WOW. You're going to finish 6 hours of classes in one second???

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #380 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:36 am

In post 366, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 365, BlackStar wrote:Stop fighting over trivial shit and work together so that we can figure out who is scum

^scum

probably. Should still listen to him.

ika · Post Post #381 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:37 am

In post 378, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 373, BlackStar wrote:I already voted for him.

good

my vote is not moving from Ika. Though I'd also be up for a force replace.

Are you going to adress my point or silvers that she asked or are you going to admit that your just bullshitting

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #382 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:37 am

In post 379, Almost50 wrote:
In post 342, RadiantCowbells wrote:Gimme a sec I'm in classes for the next 6 hours.

WOW. You're going to finish 6 hours of classes in one second???

I will smack you in the face with a bowl of chocolate pudding.

Nero Cain · Post Post #383 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:39 am

you have no point Ika. You never do.

BlackStar · Post Post #384 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:39 am

In post 380, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 366, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 365, BlackStar wrote:Stop fighting over trivial shit and work together so that we can figure out who is scum

^scum

probably. Should still listen to him.

I think its pretty interesting that people keep saying that i'm scummy and then they don't explain why. Thanks for the second part of that post though

BlackStar · Post Post #385 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:40 am

In post 375, Ricastle wrote:Silver, what's the difference between that scumgame of ika's you linked and here?

Answer this

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #386 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:40 am

In post 383, Nero Cain wrote:you have no point Ika. You never do.

is Ika's presence or absence of a point a scumtell and can you not wait until I can read?

Nero Cain · Post Post #387 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:42 am

no to both

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #388 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:43 am

In post 384, BlackStar wrote:
In post 380, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 366, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 365, BlackStar wrote:Stop fighting over trivial shit and work together so that we can figure out who is scum

^scum

probably. Should still listen to him.

I think its pretty interesting that people keep saying that i'm scummy and then they don't explain why. Thanks for the second part of that post though

I've explained why I'm leaning scum on u.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #389 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:43 am

like if you quicklynch Ika before I get back and he flips town I'm going to systematically lynch everyone on the wagon starting from whoever voted him after I joined.

You think Blackstar's scum, I think Blackstar's scum, y don't u do something on that front instead of pressuring a heavy PR claim.

Nero Cain · Post Post #390 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:43 am

like there's 0% reason to put the game on hold for 6 hours until you get out of class.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #391 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:45 am

the's 100% reason to NOT pressure someone who claimed the equivalent of cop on D1 for 6 hours until I can see if there's any validity to the scumreads.

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #392 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:46 am

agree that the game should not go on hold. agree that this lynch should absolutely not get pushed through quickly. everyone happy?

Nero Cain · Post Post #393 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:46 am

In post 389, RadiantCowbells wrote:You think Blackstar's scum, I think Blackstar's scum, y don't u do something on that front instead of pressuring a heavy PR claim.

b/c I don't want Ika here if all he's going to do is sit there and fuss about how "bad" my play is. Also I don't really buy his claim.

but he's not gonna get quicklynched in 6 hours so like WTF?

Almost50 · Post Post #394 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:48 am

In post 347, Ricastle wrote:There is no benefit to lynching a VT over a PR

I beg your pardon?? So lynching a VT is the same lynching the town doctor/seer/tracker in this game, Or -generally speaking- lynching the cop/town vig/JOAT .. etc.??? Is that what you're saying???

BlackStar · Post Post #395 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:48 am

In post 325, JarJarDrinks wrote:This is all written before this SEER claim business. Will analyze all that in a bit.

Xkfyu
- Town. Already stated how I liked his "Fuck it" vote for me. And I see plenty of good scumhunting.

Keysor
- Town. As he pointed out, he's seeing the same things from people that I am. He's also trying to get people to expound on their posts which lines up w/ my read of his town meta

IAI
- Townlean. I like his questioning of Almost and Keysor.

Ricastle
- Townlean. Only a few posts but I like em. No fluff and pretty confrontational. Need more though

Robster
- null. Nothing really scummy from Robster. Maybe a slight townlean but not enough content to make a real read.

Snarky
- null. Basically the same as Robster but leaning slightly scum instead cause his posts have zero content.

Zulfy
- null. Again, No content so no real read.

Nero
- null. I like his point about bebop. I don't like his attitude about Ika. He's never pro-town regardless of alignment yet he's also easy to read?

SilverWolf
- null. Started off scummy (106 feels very opportunistic even though I pretty much agree w/ the points). Then started townreading him cause I like his analysis of people defending ika. Not really crazy about his Zulf vote now.

BeBop
- scumlean. I dont like his soft meta defense of Almost. I've stated why. Also I agree w/ nero that his RVS unvote comment was very LAMIST

BlackStar
-
scumlean. I think there's a chance that 88 was a scumslip.
Though that would make Almost town which is the not the way I'm leaning

ika
- scumlean. His townread on silver doesn't feel very genuine. He's kinda just throwing votes around w/ no real reasoning. He mostly ignored everything w/ Almost. Just lots of fluff in his posts.

Almost50
- scum. I've posted plenty about Almost so not gonna rehash it all here.

Bluerose
- scum.
- Point about ignoring my wagon stands.
- Him using the word "either" in that post points to him not really believing in his reads.
- He's townreading me for pressuring Almost who he is also townreading.
- He says keysors posts don't really look like scumhunting even though keysor and I are posting similar stuff and he's townreading me.
- He questions the Ika/Silver "sorting party" which seems good on the surface. But then they give him a non-answer and he pretty much backs off
Basically his posts seem designed to not get on anyone's bad side

How can you even see that as a scum slip? In the very next post i said that I thought he was scum at that point. the reason I worded post 88 like that is that I was playing devil's advocate.

SilverWolf · Post Post #396 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:48 am

In post 393, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 389, RadiantCowbells wrote:You think Blackstar's scum, I think Blackstar's scum, y don't u do something on that front instead of pressuring a heavy PR claim.

b/c I don't want Ika here if all he's going to do is sit there and fuss about how "bad" my play is. Also I don't really buy his claim.

but he's not gonna get quicklynched in 6 hours so like WTF?

In post 374, SilverWolf wrote:
In post 368, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 364, SilverWolf wrote:
In post 362, Nero Cain wrote:like have you ever done well in a game? The only two players that think you are any good are Titus and Silver and everyone knows how much of a hot mess they are.

Really? Have you ever played with me before?

no, I just heard you were bad.

Is there some reason you are bringing this into this game and trying to goad myself and ika?

What's your point?

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #397 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:49 am

In post 393, Nero Cain wrote:b/c I don't want Ika here if all he's going to do is sit there and fuss about how "bad" my play is.

YOU'RE doing the same thing. You're BOTH shitting up the thread so stop k?

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #398 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:50 am

In post 393, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 389, RadiantCowbells wrote:You think Blackstar's scum, I think Blackstar's scum, y don't u do something on that front instead of pressuring a heavy PR claim.

b/c I don't want Ika here if all he's going to do is sit there and fuss about how "bad" my play is. Also I don't really buy his claim.

but he's not gonna get quicklynched in 6 hours so like WTF?

hey I haven't seen a votecount and I don't like the direction things are going to I'm going to smack you around.

I'm assuming that if Ika claimed seer he's at L-1 or at least L-2 so everyone can chill their frigid butts. we're not lynching seer claim.

Almost50 · Post Post #399 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:50 am

In post 347, Ricastle wrote:such a move is completely pointless if one does not know who the PRs they should be redirecting attention from are

As a matter of fact: One does NOT need to know who they are AT ALL. You're mixing what I was trying to do with a doctor/bodyguard role. THEY should know whom they should TARGET to protect. A VT doesn't.