I was a paranoid cop in our last game that claimed Day 2. After threeRishi wrote:Huh? Am I the only one who is confused?someone2 wrote:unvote
vote: Streeflo
cause he is surely not a paranoid cop lol...
Bad memories > >
I was a paranoid cop in our last game that claimed Day 2. After threeRishi wrote:Huh? Am I the only one who is confused?someone2 wrote:unvote
vote: Streeflo
cause he is surely not a paranoid cop lol...
LoudmouthLee wrote:They dynamic between Streeflo and Claus is very interesting. I'll keep an eye on the both of them.
This seems a little too hypocritical to pass up posting.LoudmouthLee wrote:This, to me, seems incredibly odd and out of sorts. Almost too polite. It seems forced. Faked. It reminds me of the Mafia Buddying Up Technique.Rishi wrote:Oh. Okay. The fact that you unvoted to vote for Streeflo seemed odd. If you wanted to make a reference to a previous game, I would think you'd scan the player list, find his name, and then make the reference.
By unvoting, you made it sound like your vote was a reaction to his post. I apologize for the confusion.
I'll place the first non-random vote.
Unvote, Vote: Rishi
There's nothing wrong with the a little civility once in a while.LoudmouthLee wrote: This, to me, seems incredibly odd and out of sorts. Almost too polite. It seems forced. Faked. It reminds me of the Mafia Buddying Up Technique.
Hypocritical is wrong.. more like pointing out possible pairings. I thought the Rishi post was odd, along with Claus's post, with yours directly afterwards. Both just seemed... odd.Streeflo wrote:LoudmouthLee wrote:They dynamic between Streeflo and Claus is very interesting. I'll keep an eye on the both of them.This seems a little too hypocritical to pass up posting.LoudmouthLee wrote:This, to me, seems incredibly odd and out of sorts. Almost too polite. It seems forced. Faked. It reminds me of the Mafia Buddying Up Technique.Rishi wrote:Oh. Okay. The fact that you unvoted to vote for Streeflo seemed odd. If you wanted to make a reference to a previous game, I would think you'd scan the player list, find his name, and then make the reference.
By unvoting, you made it sound like your vote was a reaction to his post. I apologize for the confusion.
I'll place the first non-random vote.
Unvote, Vote: Rishi
You don't get to form ANY bandwagon without the town believeing in you. What do you expect me to do? Twiddle my thumbs and not be aggressive? I implore you, check out ANY of my games. I am hyper aggressive.Claus wrote:Hmmm, it seems to me that you are trying too hard to make cases out of thin air, LML. This is the second time already. (a _little_ better than the "interesting dynamic" in random votes, however).
Vote: LML
And I get to form the first bandwagon - yay!
Scum however are forced to make cases out of thin air are they not? Day one, two whenever.rite wrote:unvote: LML
Hopping off that bandwagon,making cases out of thin airare what day start day one is all about, no reason to punish it.
Wow... let me count...LoudmouthLee wrote: You don't get to form ANY bandwagon without the town believeing in you. What do you expect me to do? Twiddle my thumbs and not be aggressive? I implore you, check out ANY of my games. I am hyper aggressive.
It catches scum an awful lot. You may be scared of the best mafia performance button by my name, but the year before that, I was the paragon of mafia hunters.
Pairings are important to look at, especially after we gain valuable information through lynching and NKs. Instead of just documenting these pairings in my notes, I give them to everyone to read. It tends to make scum very nervous.
So, Claus, are you nervous?
Then I think we'll get along just fine.LoudmouthLee wrote:Don't worry. I am patronizing. I'm a true asshole
Because it gets people talking. Why do a meaningless random vote when you can get people accusing and defending you by doing something a bit more bold?kuribo wrote:Claus, why are you trying to form a bandwagon on such shaky ground?