Open 46 - Strawberry (Game Over!), before 508
-
-
skitzer Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: September 1, 2007
-
-
Erg0 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4157
- Joined: February 25, 2007
- Location: Secret Aussie.
-
-
White Goon
-
-
competentpsycho Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 331
- Joined: September 17, 2007
- Location: Kosovo :(
You've got to be kidding me!! Read my post again - I am saying DON'T bandwagon as you just did because we need to be SURE (ie not just take other people's opinions about someone and say "Yeah sure that sounds good I will vote for that guy") that they are scum. Let me repeat this incase any other people somehow misunderstood me. DO NOT BANDWAGON. There are 3 scum left and only 7 townies. 6 votes to lynch. Therefore, if you start a bandwagon then the mafia can finish it with only 3 votes from actual townies. Make sure to make your own decision. Again, DO NOT BANDWAGON. It is true we need 6 of 7 townies to vote for scum, but if we start a bandwagon on someone random it is a 70 % chance it is a townie. The fact that you just went with a bandwagon on me from Mean's no explanation vote (YOU STILL NEED TO EXPLAIN MR MEAN) makes me think you and mean are scum. Additionally, be careful with your votes until you are sure that person is scum, as half the votes needed to lynch can come from scum. Use FOS's.skitzer wrote:
Are you pushing for a bandwagon? That's not very good-looking. We should sniff em out before we immediately go bandwagoning.competentpsycho wrote:Since we need 6 votes to lynch and there is only 7 townies left... that means we basically need 6 of 7 townies to vote on a scum, since I doubt any scum will vote for their scumbuddies, unless they are going to sacrifice one, but we would have to have a bandwagon on one to get them to do that anyway. We NEED to make sure we have the right guy this time.
Vote: competentpsycho
Summed up:
1) Do not bandwagon
2) Use FOS's
3) Mr. Mean explain your vote (and skitzer if you have any reasons but your misinterpretation of my last post)
Strong FOS: skitzer
FOS: Mr. Mean-
-
competentpsycho Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 331
- Joined: September 17, 2007
- Location: Kosovo :(
Ok rereading page 8 I get major scum alarms going off. Mr. Mean - I doubt you don't know that lurking is bad - don't give me the "I am a n00b" excuse because you joined before me, and that has to be one of the first things you learn. Big time FOS here. Also - no explanation (as of yet) to your vote that seems to be bandwagonning with skitz.
Skitz I stated before why I think he is scum.
Max's breadcrumbs things made no sense to me until I tried looking at it from the point of view that he is scum. If he was scum then this post would be protecting skitz by aluding that he has a power role. Therefore that he was town. In addition he makes the statement that he is suspicious of skitz, thus trying to distance himself from skitz, but not voting so as to not endanger skitz. If he were town this makes no sense as I do not see how skitz's comment before that is breadcrumbing at all. Maybe I am missing something here (in that case please spell it out for me) but I am pretty sure these are our 3 scum at this point.
unvote
vote: skitzer
FOS: Mr. Mean, Max-
-
d3sisted Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1085
- Joined: August 7, 2007
- Location: Vancouver, BC
-
-
competentpsycho Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 331
- Joined: September 17, 2007
- Location: Kosovo :(
It is not OMGUS - I don't mind votes on me with valid reasons. Twisting my words around and then being a hypocrite and not giving a reason are different stories. The former is VERY scummy and the latter is completely useless to the town, and likely scummy. Combined with no vote in the middle these seem linked and therefore even scummier. If they did this to someone else I would feel the same way. I don't OMGUS after random voting stage - it just takes away from the search for scum by wasting a vote on someone that doesn't necessarily deserve it and is a problem for giving scum a chance to get a townie lynched. I am quite serious about this vote and statement as to who is scum.-
-
White Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 965
- Joined: August 6, 2007
- Location: Deep in the South
d3sisted, I don't think you've given a case against Neraren, i'm all ears.ShowHouse Rules:
1. God came to my house and I killed him.
2. I will kill anyone who comes to my house like I killed God.
3. Give me one dead body and I might let rule #2 slide.
You have until Dawn.-
-
competentpsycho Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 331
- Joined: September 17, 2007
- Location: Kosovo :(
This is the reason desisted seemed scummy to me earlier. His posts are extremely short and usually with little explanation. I am now thinking it is just his playstyle, though. I would still like to see explanations on anyone's suspicions, though so please expand on this.
People I want explanations from:
Mr Mean - vote on me
desisted - statement that Neraren is the lynch for today
skitz - agoodreason on vote for me
Max - your statement about skitz's post that I mentioned earlier
People I want to talk more:
Neraren
Zeppo - you're only post was a combo of stating the obvious and misinterpreting
Boing
killerbob-
-
White Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 965
- Joined: August 6, 2007
- Location: Deep in the South
Hey nice, i'm in neither list!ShowHouse Rules:
1. God came to my house and I killed him.
2. I will kill anyone who comes to my house like I killed God.
3. Give me one dead body and I might let rule #2 slide.
You have until Dawn.-
-
competentpsycho Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 331
- Joined: September 17, 2007
- Location: Kosovo :(
-
-
Mr. Mean Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 28
- Joined: September 9, 2007
-
-
competentpsycho Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 331
- Joined: September 17, 2007
- Location: Kosovo :(
Holy shit do you not read the posts at all. I guess this is just to try to save face since I pointed out that this could be a bandwagon on me because you are scum, which just supports my argument. You are just using the same argument skitz posted after your explaination-less vote on me, therefore bandwagonning yourself.
What I am actually saying is don't bandwagon. If I wanted to start a bandwagon I would have voted and stated a case against someone. I didn't. Even now, I am the only vote on skitz (no bandwagon there). My comment was tonotbandwagon because the only way we are going to get a scum lynch today is to get MOST (read 6/7) of the townies to vote for a scum. Therefore do NOT bandwagon since if you are just joining a mafia's vote you are fucking us over. My comment is to think carefully about everyone's arguments and make you're own decision as to who is scum. DO NOT just take everyone's argument as truth, because three of the 10 people alive are mafia and will be lying and be underhanded. To reiterate... BE CAREFUL, BE SUSPICIOUS OF EVERYONE, MAKE YOUR OWN DECISION-
-
d3sisted Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1085
- Joined: August 7, 2007
- Location: Vancouver, BC
-
-
competentpsycho Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 331
- Joined: September 17, 2007
- Location: Kosovo :(
-
-
d3sisted Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1085
- Joined: August 7, 2007
- Location: Vancouver, BC
-
-
competentpsycho Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 331
- Joined: September 17, 2007
- Location: Kosovo :(
I can only assume you are talking about the bussing thing - so I didn't know a term. I am not voting someone here because I didn't read the entire thread, which is what I was saying. I really don't care if everyone read everything on the wiki, as experience playing seems the best way to learn. If I assumed wrong please tell me what you are talking about. Also, can you explain your case against Neraren finally?-
-
d3sisted Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1085
- Joined: August 7, 2007
- Location: Vancouver, BC
-
-
competentpsycho Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 331
- Joined: September 17, 2007
- Location: Kosovo :(
This??!??! This is the only argument you are going to put forth and then conlcluding saying he is the lynch for the day. This comment shows that maybe he is busy, lurking townie (which is bad - if this is you stop NOW), or mafia, but this as conclusive evidence that he is mafia is completely ignorant, especially if we can make a better case on someone else. Therefore, which is what I was looking for, show me some more evidence than that if you have any. You were silent when white and I asked for explanation before, posting other things but not even commenting on that. This is very anti-town. My suspicion has returned to you yet again. Congrats.d3sisted wrote:Right now I'm quite suspicious of Neraren. He slipped by Day 1 without voting at all. Not only that, but he has failed to name any susicions. Looks to me like he's trying to keep an extremely low profile, and I'm not liking the looks of that.
Vote: Neraren
FOS: Mr. Mean (if I could cast 2 votes I would vote him too)
Max (just by association with skitz with the breadcrumb thing)
d3sisted (for being anti-town)
Right now I am fairly sure that Mean and skitz are mafia - the only question I have is who their partner is. I was thinking Max but my decision for that is based on little evidence that he has yet to dispute. Looks like d3sisted may be the partner also. Anybody else got input defending these guys or perhaps implicating others?-
-
Neraren Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 44
- Joined: September 17, 2007
Kinda busy, last few weeks have been midterms. My last onee is due tomorrow though (Accursed online courses), so I should be around more starting soon.competentpsycho wrote: This??!??! This is the only argument you are going to put forth and then conlcluding saying he is the lynch for the day. This comment shows that maybe he is busy, lurking townie (which is bad - if this is you stop NOW), or mafia, but this as conclusive evidence that he is mafia is completely ignorant, especially if we can make a better case on someone else.
Back to the topic at hand though, while I do appreciate the vote of confidence, do you want to maybe narrow your scope a little? You've got a vote on skitzer and fingers on Mr. Mean, Max, and d3sisted. Don't you think you're casting your net a bit wide?-
-
d3sisted Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1085
- Joined: August 7, 2007
- Location: Vancouver, BC
@competentpsycho: I have no qualms with his activity. Rather, he has been lurking in plain sight, posting without material.
Don't give me that crap about inconclusive evidence. If he was town, he would not be afraid to come out and throw down some suspicions, trigger some responses and whatnot. In my experience, the tentative ones often come out scum.
I was silent before because your questions were already answered. You just failed to read the thread, and that's not my problem.
I also find it funny how you say you can make a better case on someone else, when the entirety of your case on skitzer is based on theory and inapplicable to the reality of the game, as I will proceed to explain. Just keep in mind that because this deals with scum and such, it is entirely wifom and I am aware of that.
NEVER will all members of a scum team so blatantly pile on for the quicklynch. In theory they could do that, but in reality it just doesn't happen. Scum are not stupid, they play smart.competentpsycho wrote: There are 3 scum left and only 7 townies. 6 votes to lynch. Therefore, if you start a bandwagon then the mafia can finish it with only 3 votes from actual townies.
Percentages rarely apply in these situations. The only time it does is when the target was picked by random. When you factor in the presence of alliances, external influences, informed judgements, etc, it could range from something like 20% - 99%.competentpsycho wrote:Make sure to make your own decision. Again, DO NOT BANDWAGON. It is true we need 6 of 7 townies to vote for scum, but if we start a bandwagon on someone random it is a 70 % chance it is a townie.
Bandwagons do not mean scum team.competentpsycho wrote:The fact that you just went with a bandwagon on me from Mean's no explanation vote (YOU STILL NEED TO EXPLAIN MR MEAN) makes me think you and mean are scum.
Negative. Votes apply pressure. FoS's do not.competentpsycho wrote:Additionally, be careful with your votes until you are sure that person is scum, as half the votes needed to lynch can come from scum. Use FOS's.
Sorry, but I'm not seeing it. Can you please point out how Max is breadcrumbing?competentpsycho wrote:Max's breadcrumbs things made no sense to me until I tried looking at it from the point of view that he is scum. If he was scum then this post would be protecting skitz by aluding that he has a power role. Therefore that he was town.
Just a post ago, you were telling people not to vote and use FoS instead. This is the epitome of hypocrisy, and it tempts me tocompetentpsycho wrote:In addition he makes the statement that he is suspicious of skitz, thus trying to distance himself from skitz, but not voting so as to not endanger skitz.FoSyou.
So rather than attack the 3 that you are pretty sure are our 3 scum, you choose to attack me. Hum.competentpsycho wrote: Maybe I am missing something here (in that case please spell it out for me) but I am pretty sure these are our 3 scum at this point.
Preview edit: Good to see you are here, Neraren. Once you've got a reread down, can you give us your list of suspicions?This. Is. [color=red][b]SPARTA![/b][/color]
[color=red][b][i]V/LA Dec 22 - Jan 4[/i][/b][/color]-
-
d3sisted Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1085
- Joined: August 7, 2007
- Location: Vancouver, BC
I find it EXTREMELY hard to believe that you voted/FoS'd the only two players on your wagon without doing OMGUS.competentpsycho wrote:It is not OMGUS - I don't mind votes on me with valid reasons. Twisting my words around and then being a hypocrite and not giving a reason are different stories. The former is VERY scummy and the latter is completely useless to the town, and likely scummy. Combined with no vote in the middle these seem linked and therefore even scummier. If they did this to someone else I would feel the same way. I don't OMGUS after random voting stage - it just takes away from the search for scum by wasting a vote on someone that doesn't necessarily deserve it and is a problem for giving scum a chance to get a townie lynched. I am quite serious about this vote and statement as to who is scum.This. Is. [color=red][b]SPARTA![/b][/color]
[color=red][b][i]V/LA Dec 22 - Jan 4[/i][/b][/color]-
-
competentpsycho Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 331
- Joined: September 17, 2007
- Location: Kosovo :(
This is anti-town.d3sisted wrote: I was silent before because your questions were already answered. You just failed to read the thread, and that's not my problem.
I didn't say they would quick lynch - I was saying they could start a bandwagon and lead us toward lynching a townie. Mafia could do this, with a suspicious looking townie.d3sisted wrote:I also find it funny how you say you can make a better case on someone else, when the entirety of your case on skitzer is based on theory and inapplicable to the reality of the game, as I will proceed to explain. Just keep in mind that because this deals with scum and such, it is entirely wifom and I am aware of that.
NEVER will all members of a scum team so blatantly pile on for the quicklynch. In theory they could do that, but in reality it just doesn't happen. Scum are not stupid, they play smart.competentpsycho wrote: There are 3 scum left and only 7 townies. 6 votes to lynch. Therefore, if you start a bandwagon then the mafia can finish it with only 3 votes from actual townies.
d3sisted wrote:
Percentages rarely apply in these situations.competentpsycho wrote:Make sure to make your own decision. Again, DO NOT BANDWAGON. It is true we need 6 of 7 townies to vote for scum, but if we start a bandwagon onsomeone randomit is a 70 % chance it is a townie.The only time it does is when the target was picked by random.When you factor in the presence of alliances, external influences, informed judgements, etc, it could range from something like 20% - 99%.
True. But the reason they used on me was they said I was saying to bandwagon, and concluded with what my point actually was, NOT to bandwagon. Then they bandwagonned me for this. This does seem scummy.d3sisted wrote:
Bandwagons do not mean scum team.competentpsycho wrote:The fact that you just went with a bandwagon on me from Mean's no explanation vote (YOU STILL NEED TO EXPLAIN MR MEAN) makes me think you and mean are scum.
I said be careful with your votes, not to not use them.d3sisted wrote:
Negative. Votes apply pressure. FoS's do not.competentpsycho wrote:Additionally, be careful with your votes until you are sure that person is scum, as half the votes needed to lynch can come from scum. Use FOS's.
Read the fucking thread. Max made a comment about skitz breadcrumbing (which I do not see skitz doing) - that is what I was talking about. I do not understand how what skitz did was breadcrumbing, which means there must be a reason Max did this other than that. This does not benefit town in any way so... Here I am not sure so if anyone has an explanation of to how skitz was breadcrumbing that would be most appreciatedd3sisted wrote:
Sorry, but I'm not seeing it. Can you please point out how Max is breadcrumbing?competentpsycho wrote:Max's breadcrumbs things made no sense to me until I tried looking at it from the point of view that he is scum. If he was scum then this post would be protecting skitz by aluding that he has a power role. Therefore that he was town.
As I said before - I just said be careful with your vote, not to not vote.d3sisted wrote:
Just a post ago, you were telling people not to vote and use FoS instead. This is the epitome of hypocrisy, and it tempts me tocompetentpsycho wrote:In addition he makes the statement that he is suspicious of skitz, thus trying to distance himself from skitz, but not voting so as to not endanger skitz.FoSyou.
I am very sure on skitz and Mean. Max is debatable at the moment. Then you go and do shit that I find anti-town. What am I supposed to do?d3sisted wrote:
So rather than attack the 3 that you are pretty sure are our 3 scum, you choose to attack me. Hum.competentpsycho wrote: Maybe I am missing something here (in that case please spell it out for me) but I am pretty sure these are our 3 scum at this point.-
-
Zeppo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 138
- Joined: June 22, 2007
- Location: Cardiff
-
-
Max Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2280
- Joined: April 11, 2006
Posting messages about their power in secret code. I don't believe he was bread crumbing but I was stating the fact that his post seemed organized in an unusual way, This can be a way for scum to communicate during day or the cop to give messages subliminally so they can come back to those post later in the game.
Maybe it would say this
Possible Bread Crumb in obvious writing wrote: I have very few suspects at the moment.
My only concern is pong head
Mason claim already seems scummy.
And noones counterclaimed yet
So who should we vote.
Oedipus as he's claimed and there's meant to be no mason in this game!!!
Now I'm at school post more later
It can be used by masons for communication during day it varies some people when they play as scum use them others don'tsame in normal text wrote:I have very few suspects at the moment.
My only concern is Oedipus head. Mason claim already seems scummy. And noones counterclaimed yet. So who should we vote. Oedipus as he's claimed and there's meant to be no mason in this game!!! Now I'm at school post more later
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.