In post 1070, Cephrir wrote: In post 1068, rb wrote:Oh that? All you said was basically, "you're wrong". Was there a question or something worth responding to that I missed?
lolk.
Actually there is something, now that I read my original post for context.
The chain goes:
MathBlade wrote:Light scumread on RB right now for posting math instead of content.
Don't get me wrong I love numbers but this is bad.
If y'all want probability numbers I can fucking do that but that leads to a ton of gambler's fallacy and I would rather focus on scum hunting.
Ceph wrote:Ignore the numbers and you'll see there's content in those posts.
Right here you're giving MathBlade a contrary opinion after he gives me a light scumread. He's saying, "scumread for lack of content" and you're saying, "actually there IS content."
The implied point here being that you're
not
scumreading me - and since you didn't specify that it was actually a null-read, the impression I got is that it was a town-read.
So if I was wrong and you're not townreading me, I want to know if English is your first language because I feel like there's a language barrier here. And no that's not meant as an insult. If English is actually is your first language then please be more clear because I don't see it at all weird that I'd interpret your post as a townread.
Also if I'm null-read why are you bothering to defend me? Wouldn't you wait to see how I actually respond first? You're telling me you weren't sheeping and your response in 1032 made me think I was just wrong because of the way you dismissed it, but now I'm back to thinking you're potentially sheeping me.