I wonder if Betty Boop has anything to say about it.
In other news, I feel the sudden urge to test something:
Care to elaborate?Tarhalindur wrote:Given the flavor behind the second kill and something I spotted shortly before yesterdays lynch (but didn't have time to comment on) that makes me less certain that Battle Mage is guilty, Skruffs is currently higher on my scumdar.
Sorry if I missed this, but how does the School Secretary being town fit in with this theory?Gorrad wrote:The way I see it, the first kill was made by the administration-mafia. Administration is used in the literal sense here. There's usually a group of high-ups in the school called the administration- this includes principal, vice-principals, department heads, and other people who don't teach but handle administrative affairs. This would sometimes include the librarian, but never the lunch lady. In this scenario, they are getting rid of students- probably budget cuts or something (http://www.scarygoround.com/index.php?date=20051011).
If it was purely adults, we could lynch every adult and win, despite some being pro-town. There has to be a mix, otherwise it would be too easy. Do you really think there would be a game- a DGB game at that- where rolenames would be dead givaways?Skruffs wrote:Okay.
"1. The administration is out to get us, and is probably enlisting help from brownnosing students. "
Gorrad, where did you form this hypothesis - with the brownnosing students corollary?
I agree with this. This is the reason why I think there is a second scum group made of students. (so, lunch lady is unlikely to be the person to kill JDodge)Gorrad wrote: If it was purely adults, we could lynch every adult and win, despite some being pro-town. There has to be a mix, otherwise it would be too easy. Do you really think there would be a game- a DGB game at that- where rolenames would be dead givaways?
I also very much agree with this. I don't think we'll get much information from role names.Gorrad wrote:If it was purely adults, we could lynch every adult and win, despite some being pro-town. There has to be a mix, otherwise it would be too easy. Do you really think there would be a game- a DGB game at that- where rolenames would be dead givaways?Skruffs wrote:Okay.
"1. The administration is out to get us, and is probably enlisting help from brownnosing students. "
Gorrad, where did you form this hypothesis - with the brownnosing students corollary?
unless of course, like most SK's/mafia groups, you didnt know your kill method at the start of the game...Skruffs wrote:Yes, but if I was an sk who killed by cooking, and I claimed to be someone who worked in an area where food is cooked, and almost got lynched, I wouldn't kill the first nihght, esp after claiming. I don't think anyone is that shortsighted.
And you've never played in a game with an SK?Skruffs wrote:I wouldn't know, I've never been an sk.
I'm going to focus on people who didn't toss food on one of the three main wagons late day 1, for starters. I don't like "either/or" mentality regarding bm/skruffs as scum (false dilemma), and probably people who said one thing but acted another.
I have reason to believe that a mass food claim would be a very bad idea for us. I will NOT elaborate at this time.Sir Tornado wrote:Erg0, look at the flavor. The secretary looks like some sort of renegede admin. Plus the fact that the secretary wasdismissed, which I don't think could have been the work of any student.
Not saying all admin are mafia or all students are not (in fact after thinking more clearly, I think second kill would have been made by a student)
Day one is over, and I guess most of the food is out in the open. Can we have a mass claim of all our foodstuff (only name, not quantity) to avoid reread of entire thread to see who had what?
Sayonara.
It should be rather obvious by now that I have role-based information. Quit fishing.Skruffs wrote:Tarhalindur -
"No, I'm, like, saying that there are people in this cafeteria who, like, want to take over this school, and they're, like, responsible for this food fight somehow.
We must, like, totally get them sent home before we, like, lose control of the school! Who's with me?
One! Two! Three! Four!
Let's go find some scum to smore! "
You said this yesterday, adn I called you on it, and you said you were just guessing, I believe. Can you share any more information with us about this?
No.Gorrad wrote:Care to elaborate?Tarhalindur wrote:Given the flavor behind the second kill and something I spotted shortly before yesterdays lynch (but didn't have time to comment on) that makes me less certain that Battle Mage is guilty, Skruffs is currently higher on my scumdar.
Gorrad wrote:Tar, I find your withholding information infuriating. I'm trusting you, even though you did not trust me earlier, but I find your uncooperativeness scummy. Scum have more to hide than town.
Not originally directed at you, but still relevant here. If you want me to role claim, stop beating around the bush and say so, because revealing my information necessarily entails a role claim.Tarhalindur wrote:It should be rather obvious by now that I have role-based information. Quit fishing.
Gorrad wrote:Tar, I find your withholding information infuriating. I'm trusting you, even though you did not trust me earlier, but I find your uncooperativeness scummy. Scum have more to hide than town.
The next time you ask me to claim my food, I will alpha strike you. (Hell, I'm tempted to alpha strike you NOW for your continued inquiries.) Unless I am very much mistaken, there is NO GOOD REASON for town to ask what someone has in their lunchbox. QUIT FISHING.Gorrad wrote:The only information I REALLY want is your food, because what you threw earlier poses a direct threat to my health. Otherwise, it's up to you to claim or not, but if your claiming gives us more insight, I don't know why you wouldn't. That's why I'm trusting you, because I don't know your role, and you do.