Ok, CRAPLOGIC.kuribo wrote:The circular logic is obvious:
Competentpsycho- Fairy, you need to contribute!
(Fairy contributes)
Competentpsycho- YOU CALL THAT CONTRIBUTION? CONTRIBUTE!
Telling her to add something to the conversation, and then complaining when that it wasn't enough and she should do more? Yeah, that's a circle, because when she DOES do more, you could say it's not enough.
Listen, you got the order weird.
me - you need to contribute
her - the "contribution" you speak of which is translated as circular logic
me - WTF (translated by you guys into "Contribute more" - I actually meant "WTF" as in I don't understand)
so apparently:
1) Fairy can see the future
2) You know this
or:
Your logic = TOTAL CRAP
How could she be calling what I had done up to that point circular logic? That is what I am asking. You are including things as evidence to the circular logic that happened after the accusation, if that is what she was doing. That doesn't work in an argument.
The person I would expect an actual answer to this question from is roffman who was the one who speculated that it means circular logic.