Mini 549 (Tarhalindur Mostly Mountainous) - Game Over

[Ectomancer]

I think I see the problem. Rosso Carne has 2 votes, but only Tamuz's name is next to it. You probably misread the text and assumed you had 2 votes. (Also there can't be 12 of us not voting

tweaks the mod

)

The question yet remains, why would you be concerned in the random phase on page 1, even if there should be 2 votes on you?

Moving beyond the random stage...

vote Tamuz

[Rosso Carne]

uh-oh, do i smell a massclaim in the future

*sniff*

no, probably not.

[Tamuz]

Hey Mr. Aggressive. I wasn't saying that I have two votes on me, I was saying that I have the power of 2 votes. Hence the "Why do I have two votes?"

Maybe I'm hallucinating, but there is a little 2 by RC's vote count, but only one person there. I think it would be good to establish why I have that little power, or if its a mod mistake.

So how about you get your head out of your arse and stop spinning my words. My fact are right, the only potential is that my eyes are wrong.

[Rosso Carne]

Hey Mr. Aggressive. I wasn't saying that I have two votes on me, I was saying that I have the power of 2 votes. Hence the "Why do I have two votes?"

Maybe I'm hallucinating, but there is a little 2 by RC's vote count, but only one person there. I think it would be good to establish why I have that little power, or if its a mod mistake.

So how about you get your head out of your arse and stop spinning my words. My fact are right, the only potential is that my eyes are wrong.

my fact are right?

you sound like a certain president of the united states.

[ryan]

Tamuz: The mod count is off as it has me voting (correct) and not voting as well.

[Jester]

Sorry about that. I looked in on this game Wednesday morning, expected to see requests to confirm, didn't, and then forgot about it until I got the reminder this morning.

And

vote: Nyktorion

, both because OMGUS is fun and because both his handle and his avatar are annoying.

[Tarhalindur]

My last vote count was made of fail (yes, Rosso had two votes - Tamuz and Blackberry - and I screwed up royally on the not voting count...). In other words, see Rule 0.

Now for happier news - Jester has confirmed, which means that everyone has confirmed. Yay!

Third (Not So Broken, I Hope) Vote Count:

Rosso Carne (2) - Tamuz, Blackberry
Blackberry (2) - Dean Harper, Rosso Carne
Earwig (1) - thenextepisode
Jester (1) - Nyktorion
Nyktorion (2) - Earwig, Jester
Tamuz (2) - Johoohno, Ectomancer
Dean Harper (1) - ryan
thenextepisode (1) - SlySly

Not Voting (0): -

FoS Count:

Ectomancer (1) - Earwig
Earwig (2) - Ectomancer, Nyktorion

Current Deadline:

~12:00 AM, February 14, 2008

First Mod Deadline Review:

~12:00 AM, January 23, 2008

[Ectomancer]

Hey Mr. Aggressive. I wasn't saying that I have two votes on me, I was saying that I have the power of 2 votes. Hence the "Why do I have two votes?"

Maybe I'm hallucinating, but there is a little 2 by RC's vote count, but only one person there. I think it would be good to establish why I have that little power, or if its a mod mistake.

So how about you get your head out of your arse and stop spinning my words. My fact are right, the only potential is that my eyes are wrong.

As I had assumed that you would be bright enough to peruse the votes and see that Rosso Carne did indeed have 2 votes made on him, and the mod simply neglected to add the 2nd name, it made more sense to me that you simply read the vote count in reverse. Otherwise, anyone who can count can see that your 1 vote doesn't count for 2, simply that the mod made a mistake.

unvote

- by my own assessment, I can't blame you for being too lazy to count the votes yourself.

[Rosso Carne]

WHEEE!!!

this sounds like a scumchat game.

[Nyktorion]

Unvote, Vote: Rosso Carne

for trying to look active without adding content.

[Rosso Carne]

Unvote, Vote: Rosso Carne

for trying to look active without adding content.

honestly nothing to comment on.

although i can make up stuff about the random voting nature of people if youd like.

[Blackberry]

Unvote, Vote: Rosso Carne

for trying to look active without adding content.

Although I appreciate the support on voting off the Nazi, I have a large problem with your ''reason''.

First -- ''Trying to look active'' makes no sense. One is either active or not active. There is no such thing as ''looking active.''

Second -- It's early in the game, how is someone supposed to add content this early when it's barely started?

Overall -- Your reason for voting RC is completely invalid. The accusation is a huge stretch and I'm unsure at this moment whether I consider this a scumtell or not.

[thenextepisode]

ectomancer's quick accusation of tamuz reeks of scum to me
his logic doesnt make any sense and i get the feeling he was trying to start a quick day 1 bandwagon for no reason

fos:ectomancer

[Ectomancer]

ectomancer's quick accusation of tamuz reeks of scum to me
his logic doesnt make any sense and i get the feeling he was trying to start a quick day 1 bandwagon for no reason

fos:ectomancer

Clearly you have me pegged. There is absolutely no reason to ever move beyond the random stage of voting

[SlySly]

Clearly you have me pegged.

To clearly peg one, would a translucent stake be required?

[Ectomancer]

I was calling thenextepisode Clearly. It is one of my terms of endearment.

[Blackberry]

ectomancer's quick accusation of tamuz reeks of scum to me
his logic doesnt make any sense and i get the feeling he was trying to start a quick day 1 bandwagon for no reason

fos:ectomancer

Clearly you have me pegged. There is absolutely no reason to ever move beyond the random stage of voting

Very defensive... >_<

[Ectomancer]

ectomancer's quick accusation of tamuz reeks of scum to me
his logic doesnt make any sense and i get the feeling he was trying to start a quick day 1 bandwagon for no reason

fos:ectomancer

Clearly you have me pegged. There is absolutely no reason to ever move beyond the random stage of voting

Very defensive... >_<

The word you are looking for is sarcastic.

[Earwig]

ectomancer's quick accusation of tamuz reeks of scum to me
his logic doesnt make any sense and i get the feeling he was trying to start a quick day 1 bandwagon for no reason

fos:ectomancer

I've been in a couple of games with Ectomancer before. That's just his play style. If you check out other games he's in or has been in, you'll see that.

[Ectomancer]

Trying to get in my good graces Earwig? Scum...

[SlySly]

I was calling thenextepisode Clearly.

Is calling thenextepisode Clearly anything like picking the wrong week to stop sniffin glue?

[Tarhalindur]

Fourth Vote Count:

Rosso Carne (3) - Tamuz, Blackberry, Nyktorion
Blackberry (2) - Dean Harper, Rosso Carne
Earwig (1) - thenextepisode
Nyktorion (2) - Earwig, Jester
Tamuz (1) - Johoohno
Dean Harper (1) - ryan
thenextepisode (1) - SlySly

Not Voting (1): Ectomancer

FoS Count:

Ectomancer (2) - Earwig, thenextepisode
Earwig (2) - Ectomancer, Nyktorion

Current Deadline:

~12:00 AM, February 14, 2008

First Mod Deadline Review:

~12:00 AM, January 23, 2008

[Ectomancer]

I was calling thenextepisode Clearly.

Is calling thenextepisode Clearly anything like picking the wrong week to stop sniffin glue?

It's exactly like that. Where are you going with this other than to pad your post count?

[Nyktorion]

Unvote, Vote: Rosso Carne

for trying to look active without adding content.

Although I appreciate the support on voting off the Nazi, I have a large problem with your ''reason''.

First -- ''Trying to look active'' makes no sense. One is either active or not active. There is no such thing as ''looking active.''

Second -- It's early in the game, how is someone supposed to add content this early when it's barely started?

Overall -- Your reason for voting RC is completely invalid. The accusation is a huge stretch and I'm unsure at this moment whether I consider this a scumtell or not.

Well, it is still possible to have many posts without really saying much (or in other words: to have a good difference between the number of posts and the number of relevant posts). And while you are right that my accusation might be miniscule in a progressed game, I think it is still a good reason for a vote considering the current ((semi-)random) state of the game, and the other possible reasons to vote for someone currently.

However, I find it quite interesting how you fiercely you are rushing towards Rosso's defence in the face of my rather semi-random accusation. Might be a slight first tell that you both have the same alignment, and that you know about that.

[Earwig]

Trying to get in my good graces Earwig? Scum...

No, I'm trying to make everyone think we're scum buddies by defending you.

On another note, SlySly has only had 3 posts. The first a random vote - nothing unusual there. The next 2 were nothing of substance. Seems to be lurking to me.

At first look, it might appear that Rosso Carne is lurking as well. I've been in game or 2 with him - this seems to be his play style. That, or he really is always scum.

Also, I have to agree with Nyktorion:

Unvote, Vote: Rosso Carne

for trying to look active without adding content.

Although I appreciate the support on voting off the Nazi, I have a large problem with your ''reason''.

First -- ''Trying to look active'' makes no sense. One is either active or not active. There is no such thing as ''looking active.''

Second -- It's early in the game, how is someone supposed to add content this early when it's barely started?

Overall -- Your reason for voting RC is completely invalid. The accusation is a huge stretch and I'm unsure at this moment whether I consider this a scumtell or not.

Well, it is still possible to have many posts without really saying much (or in other words: to have a good difference between the number of posts and the number of relevant posts). And while you are right that my accusation might be miniscule in a progressed game, I think it is still a good reason for a vote considering the current ((semi-)random) state of the game, and the other possible reasons to vote for someone currently.

However, I find it quite interesting how you fiercely you are rushing towards Rosso's defence in the face of my rather semi-random accusation. Might be a slight first tell that you both have the same alignment, and that you know about that.

However, I'm going to go one step further.

Unvote: thenextepisode

Vote: Blackberry

Yes, I realize that puts Blackberry at 3 votes - no danger of lynch yet.