The question yet remains, why would you be concerned in the random phase on page 1, even if there should be 2 votes on you?
Moving beyond the random stage...
my fact are right?Tamuz wrote:Hey Mr. Aggressive. I wasn't saying that I have two votes on me, I was saying that I have the power of 2 votes. Hence the "Why do I have two votes?"
Maybe I'm hallucinating, but there is a little 2 by RC's vote count, but only one person there. I think it would be good to establish why I have that little power, or if its a mod mistake.
So how about you get your head out of your arse and stop spinning my words. My fact are right, the only potential is that my eyes are wrong.
As I had assumed that you would be bright enough to peruse the votes and see that Rosso Carne did indeed have 2 votes made on him, and the mod simply neglected to add the 2nd name, it made more sense to me that you simply read the vote count in reverse. Otherwise, anyone who can count can see that your 1 vote doesn't count for 2, simply that the mod made a mistake.Tamuz wrote:Hey Mr. Aggressive. I wasn't saying that I have two votes on me, I was saying that I have the power of 2 votes. Hence the "Why do I have two votes?"
Maybe I'm hallucinating, but there is a little 2 by RC's vote count, but only one person there. I think it would be good to establish why I have that little power, or if its a mod mistake.
So how about you get your head out of your arse and stop spinning my words. My fact are right, the only potential is that my eyes are wrong.
Nyktorion wrote:Unvote, Vote: Rosso Carnefor trying to look active without adding content.
Clearly you have me pegged. There is absolutely no reason to ever move beyond the random stage of votingthenextepisode wrote:ectomancer's quick accusation of tamuz reeks of scum to me
his logic doesnt make any sense and i get the feeling he was trying to start a quick day 1 bandwagon for no reason
fos:ectomancer
Very defensive... >_<Ectomancer wrote:Clearly you have me pegged. There is absolutely no reason to ever move beyond the random stage of votingthenextepisode wrote:ectomancer's quick accusation of tamuz reeks of scum to me
his logic doesnt make any sense and i get the feeling he was trying to start a quick day 1 bandwagon for no reason
fos:ectomancer
The word you are looking for is sarcastic.Blackberry wrote:Very defensive... >_<Ectomancer wrote:Clearly you have me pegged. There is absolutely no reason to ever move beyond the random stage of votingthenextepisode wrote:ectomancer's quick accusation of tamuz reeks of scum to me
his logic doesnt make any sense and i get the feeling he was trying to start a quick day 1 bandwagon for no reason
fos:ectomancer
I've been in a couple of games with Ectomancer before. That's just his play style. If you check out other games he's in or has been in, you'll see that.thenextepisode wrote:ectomancer's quick accusation of tamuz reeks of scum to me
his logic doesnt make any sense and i get the feeling he was trying to start a quick day 1 bandwagon for no reason
fos:ectomancer
It's exactly like that. Where are you going with this other than to pad your post count?SlySly wrote:Is calling thenextepisode Clearly anything like picking the wrong week to stop sniffin glue?Ectomancer wrote: I was calling thenextepisode Clearly.
Well, it is still possible to have many posts without really saying much (or in other words: to have a good difference between the number of posts and the number of relevant posts). And while you are right that my accusation might be miniscule in a progressed game, I think it is still a good reason for a vote considering the current ((semi-)random) state of the game, and the other possible reasons to vote for someone currently.Blackberry wrote:Nyktorion wrote:Unvote, Vote: Rosso Carnefor trying to look active without adding content.Although I appreciate the support on voting off the Nazi, I have a large problem with your ''reason''.
First -- ''Trying to look active'' makes no sense. One is either active or not active. There is no such thing as ''looking active.''
Second -- It's early in the game, how is someone supposed to add content this early when it's barely started?
Overall -- Your reason for voting RC is completely invalid. The accusation is a huge stretch and I'm unsure at this moment whether I consider this a scumtell or not.
No, I'm trying to make everyone think we're scum buddies by defending you.Ectomancer wrote:Trying to get in my good graces Earwig? Scum...
However, I'm going to go one step further.Nyktorion wrote:Well, it is still possible to have many posts without really saying much (or in other words: to have a good difference between the number of posts and the number of relevant posts). And while you are right that my accusation might be miniscule in a progressed game, I think it is still a good reason for a vote considering the current ((semi-)random) state of the game, and the other possible reasons to vote for someone currently.Blackberry wrote:Nyktorion wrote:Unvote, Vote: Rosso Carnefor trying to look active without adding content.Although I appreciate the support on voting off the Nazi, I have a large problem with your ''reason''.
First -- ''Trying to look active'' makes no sense. One is either active or not active. There is no such thing as ''looking active.''
Second -- It's early in the game, how is someone supposed to add content this early when it's barely started?
Overall -- Your reason for voting RC is completely invalid. The accusation is a huge stretch and I'm unsure at this moment whether I consider this a scumtell or not.
However, I find it quite interesting how you fiercely you are rushing towards Rosso's defence in the face of my rather semi-random accusation. Might be a slight first tell that you both have the same alignment, and that you know about that.