Gee, maybe I don't want to mention some of the possibilities because I think it helps scum to mention them. If I had mentioned my third possibility and Iammars was scum, he might have tried to use that as a way to help himself.Guardian wrote:I thought you cited "mysterious 3rd point" as one of your reasons for being wary of the Iammars wagon. No?
That is an extremely easy way I can reasonably claim that you are using it as a way to attackpeopleideas.
Using a mysterious, unclarified, secret point to support your stance was precisely the reason I found you suspicious. You talk about something you are keeping purposefully vague, you talk about a 3rd unmentioned possibility, you talk about assumptions that you are unwilling to make -- assumptions that you are even unwilling to disclose what they are -- and use that as a basis for your stance.
Yeah, I find that suspicious.
For the record, Iammars can't use that possibility now. Moreover, the fact that certain people can't even seem to phantom what that possibility is tells me something about their roles.
-------------
@TSQ-you are criticizing Claus for responding to a question that you claim only has one answer. If that's truly the case, then why would Thesp bother to ask the question?
------------
For the record, I prefer a TSQ or Guardian wagon to a Thesp wagon. Mostly this is a matter of tone, as I think Thesp is being stubborn and dense but townish, while I feel Guardian is being manipulative/trying to pick too much at fine details and I feel TSQ is leaching onto this wagon. Guardian's willingness to hint at maybe supporting a Thespwagon is also scummy.