Oh.
Wait, whadda ya mean I replaced before the game started?
I fail at humor.
Anyway, I've seen bodyguard used as both martyr or doctor, so meh.
Oh, and
andersonw wrote:Hello everyone! This is not only my first game with a cult, but my first game. I've played mafia many times in rl, but I'm kind of new to forum mafia, so if I'm acting stupid, try not to accuse me of being scum.
Vote:Quickbenbecause he's 16th on the list, 16 syllables of eeny-meeny-miney-mo.
Who cares?Matt_S wrote:killa seven wrote: what up im checkin in.. wow alot has been posted i was here at like 8 and it was still locked ayways im kinda drunk ill be back with my vote i gotta read slow
I believe you.
We do have better things to discuss, now. Like why you're leaping to someone else's defense then finding it necessary to believe killa publicly.Matt_S wrote:
I should have never done that, you're right. Andersonw wasn't in danger of being lynched so I shouldn't have done anything. That's why I unvoted, because I realized I overreacted. I just thought we had better things to discuss than a newbie saying he's a newbie.
I did, in Ultimatum. Granted, that was a much different situation.curiouskarmadog wrote:do you really think scum would just come out and say that?
1. We have to discuss everything; well, anything that anyone feels like discussing, that happens in this thread.Matt_S wrote: Since when do we have to discuss defending someone? Isn't that already discussion? And I thought I already said I was overreacting.
Why would his lynch mean so much to you that you feel you would need to stop it if enough players in this large of a game were calling for it?Matt_S wrote:Andersonw wasn't in danger of being lynched so I shouldn't have done anything
I, for one, hope Rosso did not mean it as a joke. The existence or non-exsistence of ONE potential recruit appearing is moot, and much more likely than not poses no threat to us whatsoever. So, at this point, continuing to discuss what the possibilities are there reeks of scum trying to misdirect attention and distract from the buisness at hand. Therefore, a very strong tell.Nemesis wrote: Well the fact that even you arn't sure that it was a joke doesn't help him. And as for the speculation about the recruiter, it's discussion. I way prefer talking about something like that to talking about nothing.
I just hate the threat of "shut up or die"... Rosso contributed to the discussion with that? Plus he hasn't even responded to the post I voted him for, so it's not like the bandwagon has even got to the "worthy of defence" stage yet.
Matt_S wrote:Yeah, it's discussion, but it's about a dead guy. He could have recruits, but there could also be a second cult for all we know.
Emphasis added to aid in your reading comprehension.Nemesis wrote:VanDamien wrote:So, at this point, continuing to discusswhat the possibilities are there reeks of scum trying to misdirect attention and distract from the buisness at hand.
Um, the discussion started on the first game post. The "buisness at hand" you speak of would be random voting. You are saying that distracting people from that with actual discussion is a strong scumtell?
Because this game had a (thankfully) remarkably short random stage, and by page three had rolled around it was over.Nemesis wrote: Well if you've only just formed this opinion, how can you agree with what Rosso said on page 3?
Sure, I meant to be voting for you before that, and corrected the mistake.Matt_S wrote:VanDamien: Can you explain your newest vote on me? Did you honestly take my post to be a real suggestion that there's another cult?
Really?Charity wrote:I guess I should wait like everyone else.
Agreed, but obvious. Srsly, this is page 7 of a 30 player game hat has activity (if not from everyone) - you're worried about a no lynch already?Lloyd wrote:If everyone waits, then we'll never lynch today, and no lynch is a bad idea on day 1.
And?oEJo wrote:What the? You didn't even say anything about VanDamien.
and she follows that gem up with this:Charity wrote:I guess I should wait like everyone else.
But Lloyd, if you want to vote for me for voting for who I find scummy or where I feel the need to apply a little pressure then by all means, do. But please then explain to us why you feel doing so is scummy.Charity wrote:I really don't know who to vote for. It's kinda hard to decide.
Baloney, and craplogic. If armlx is scum, then BM is either town, or a different scumgroup, or running a clever gambit. We at least three killers, and almost certainly 2 of them are different scum groups, if not all three. Armlx's alignment says nothing about BM, either way.Khelvaster wrote:Townies can make mistakes. Scum won't tunnel vision other scum, but townies can tunnel vision other townies. This is a one-way link--Battle Mage wrote:its a nice idea, but my worry would be that should Armlx come up town, it would lead to a subsequent mislynch, this time of me, and the scum gain a major advantage.Khelvaster wrote: Also, if we could lynch armlix, and he came up scum, we would see BM as practically confirmed, yet another reason for an armlix lynch (not to tunnel vision, but yeah...he's tunnel visioning BM...)
BMif armlix is scum, you are town, but if he's town, you're undecided.
Explain to me how this being an FoS instead of a vote makes your post any less suspicious than the one you are FoSing Rosso for, seing as how, content-wise, they are otherwise almost identical.Imat wrote:Agreed.
FoS: Rosso Carne
For jumping on a bandwagon first thing when its already later into the first day. Suspicious, if you ask me, though not enough to warrant a vote.
Why are you waiting for someone to do your job as a townie? Is it because you're not town, and need a strong BW to get behind?Antithesis wrote: I am waiting for someone to make a rational, well thought case against someone else. So far, all I have seen is copious amounts of 'I think you are scummy for miniscule reason X' sort of posts and a bunch of wagon hopping. To wit I can make neither heads nor tails of where a majority of people stand.
That, plus I think it is entirely possible scum might be encouraging this behavior so as to make it easier for them to hide behind this monolithic wall of inane nonsense.
UR DOING IT WRONG.Antithesis wrote: Oh, I dunno, I may get around to making a case on someone when I feel pretty certain they are scum. Of course, my waiting isn't stopping you from doing the same, whenever you feel ready.
Antithesis, on Feb 5 wrote:I think that is part of the problem I have with the current crop of 'suspects'. People seem more than happy to drop a vote on someone, but I have yet to see anyone actually push for/ make a case against anyone so far. Everything to this point strikes me merely as a vote of convenience.
So, at least you've been consistently looking for the easy wagon for over a month. This is day one. Let me say it again - THIS IS DAY ONE. Even with a night behind us, the entire purpose of today is to develop and look for the small reactions, the tiny links, the things that do not become obvious until a couple of days are behind us. Waiting for the case to be made, so you can get behind it is not scumhunting. In fact, it's what scum often do. There SHOULD be lots of votes thrown around, and lots of wagon-shifts today. This is not a problem, this is a good thing.Antithesis, on Mar 8 wrote:I am waiting for someone to make a rational, well thought case against someone else. So far, all I have seen is copious amounts of 'I think you are scummy for miniscule reason X' sort of posts and a bunch of wagon hopping. To wit I can make neither heads nor tails of where a majority of people stand.
That, plus I think it is entirely possible scum might be encouraging this behavior so as to make it easier for them to hide behind this monolithic wall of inane nonsense.
This was almost a month ago. Who was it, and how do you feel about them now? You know what, it doesn't really matter, because this is the type of post I've seen that when a strong wagon begins to go you can point back at this, whomever it is, and claim you've been watching them.Antithesis wrote:I am suspicious of everyone.
Aside from that, there is one person in particular I am watching at the moment, but I'd rather not say their name, at least, just yet.
Ooh, here's one of those minor things you love so much. Why "them" and not "us"?Antithesis wrote:"And a claimed Miller shall lead them..."
Chapter 8, verse 12, from the Book of What the **** is this ****!
Are you suggesting that if, in fact, the cult began with a leader and a separate recruiter, that both can recruit? Otherwise, why are you worried about them? The recruiter is the one who is dead.Antithesis wrote:What bothers me is the Cult.
Lets assume that they aren't dead, that there is a recruiter and a cult leader, as some Cults have.
Bullshit, liar.thenextepisode wrote:because on day 1, i feel like there are never any legitimate reasons to vote.Lloyd wrote:thenextepisode, beside playstyle, any other reasons why you don't vote early?thenextepisode wrote:because that's just my style, i don't vote early.
No, he's asking to be run over by a bus by k7, to either prove or disprove that k7 can, in fact, choose his method of kill.TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:Is lloyd's play thoroughly incomprehensible to everyone else, too?
That's been obvious since he claimed, and doesn't merit discussion, other then giving him incentive to try and get everyone to claim, apparently. Yep, that's sure is a good thing.armlx wrote:I believe it has helped in reinforcing that BM must die this game, which is clutch for us to realize to not get tricked out of a win.
No, you're not.Battle Mage wrote:even though if you are town, i am confirmed town?Rosso Carne wrote:when i die, please vig BM tonight and lynch XTom tomorrow. That is the word.
You really are stupid aren't you... >.>
BM