Mini 546: House Mafia - Game Over


User avatar
armlx
armlx
Most JDTay-like
User avatar
User avatar
armlx
Most JDTay-like
Most JDTay-like
Posts: 13500
Joined: February 25, 2005

Post Post #400 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:51 am

Post by armlx »

Vollkan, here's my counter arguement for you trying to shred my knowledge of scum tells. Go back and find me examples of people blatantly lying leading to them being town. What about repeated 3rd votes on wagons and other things that are typically scummy. I was under the impression over reaction was an established scum tell. At least it was last time I was playing.

It's terrible play, and scum tend to play a lot worse than town just for psycological reasons.
Away Wednesday the 24th through the 31st
User avatar
curiouskarmadog
curiouskarmadog
This Space for Rant
User avatar
User avatar
curiouskarmadog
This Space for Rant
This Space for Rant
Posts: 14229
Joined: June 17, 2007
Location: Roanoke, Va

Post Post #401 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:04 pm

Post by curiouskarmadog »

Erg0 wrote:I guess I'd define it as stating suspicion of and/or actively pursuing individuals who you appear to genuinely believe are scum. By my definition, it basically amounts to "not lurking and not obviously faking it", which is why it's a point in a player's favour but not solid proof of innocence.
nothing short of a confirmed claim is solid proof of innocence. I would also add asking relevant informed questions to the definition of scum hunting.
NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE
User avatar
Erg0
Erg0
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Erg0
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4157
Joined: February 25, 2007
Location: Secret Aussie.

Post Post #402 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:14 pm

Post by Erg0 »

I think I accidentally dropped the emphasis when I edited that last sentence before posting: I meant to stress that I thought it was a
fairly minor
point in favour, unless I feel confident that I can reliably tell whether a particular player is genuinely scumhunting or just trying to give the appearance.

I agree that asking good questions is part of scumhunting, I intended that to be included in the "actively pursuing" part of the definition.
"You were doing well until everyone died."
V/LA most weekends.
User avatar
shaft.ed
shaft.ed
dem.agogue
User avatar
User avatar
shaft.ed
dem.agogue
dem.agogue
Posts: 4998
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis

Post Post #403 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 2:41 pm

Post by shaft.ed »

My eyes are really freaked up tonight so I don't think I can type much but I just wanted to point out to Erg0 that I find most of the players on the LU to be at least mildly scummy.

I've explained Pooky in detail, haven't yet gotten to armlx but I think others have made a decent case. Then Dean is a chronic lurker (who may just need replacing) and Erg0 you were doing a fair bit of lurking yourself. I don't think lurking itself is incredibly scummy as long as people respond when pressured, but in this game if it is set up with 2 lynches per day lurking could be a very viable strategy. So TG is the only player on the LU I'm getting a townish read on and he has his own issues with his TJM voting pattern vs. pressure which seems to be inverted.

On my side of the isle I'm seeing CKD and vollkan playing as usual. As others have said vollkan as scum is difficult to detect, but as town he is a vital asset. He doesn't seem to be playing out of the ordinary. If CKD weren't playing confrontational and almost belligerent I'd be worried about him. But I do understand armlx to an extent. The first time I came acccross CKD I found his style a bit scummy. But it's across the board. And armlx has been banging his head against fairly small points in this regard. Adel is a wild card right now. Her play seems most likely town as scum playing in such a manner would have to have huge balls to attract as much attention as she did, but knowing her persona I wouldn't put it past her. However, nothing of her play seems opprotunistic thus far. TJM is all over the place, and nowhere at the same time. Before he disappeared he was looking very inconsistent and in my eyes scummy. In fact I'll go on record saying I would have hammered had the twist not gone into effect before I logged in. His disapperance has thrown me for a loop, but I get the feeling he is trying to avoid what happened earlier by just avoiding the thread entrirely.

Sorry if any of this is difficult to read. I honestly can't read very much of what I wrote because of my eyes at the moment. so it's not been proofread or previewed at all. Hope this doesn't get me into trouble again ;)
User avatar
vollkan
vollkan
The Interrogator
User avatar
User avatar
vollkan
The Interrogator
The Interrogator
Posts: 5373
Joined: March 29, 2007
Location: Australia

Post Post #404 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:01 pm

Post by vollkan »

armlx wrote: Vollkan, here's my counter arguement for you trying to shred my knowledge of scum tells. Go back and find me examples of people blatantly lying leading to them being town. What about repeated 3rd votes on wagons and other things that are typically scummy. I was under the impression over reaction was an established scum tell. At least it was last time I was playing.
It can be an established tell -
for some players
. What I am trying to get across to you is that there is no universal rule that emotion = scum. For some people, they might be more likely to get frustrated as scum, but for other it might be the opposite way round.
User avatar
armlx
armlx
Most JDTay-like
User avatar
User avatar
armlx
Most JDTay-like
Most JDTay-like
Posts: 13500
Joined: February 25, 2005

Post Post #405 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 4:29 pm

Post by armlx »

I would say it's most players that do get over reactive are scum, though not all players over react to begin with. Hence my attack on CKD.
Away Wednesday the 24th through the 31st
User avatar
TheJiveMachine
TheJiveMachine
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
TheJiveMachine
Goon
Goon
Posts: 181
Joined: January 10, 2007

Post Post #406 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:43 pm

Post by TheJiveMachine »

Mod: Can I get a replacement


This game is moving too fast and I don't have time to keep up on it.

Oh well. Working on it.

-- Claus
User avatar
PookyTheMagicalBear
PookyTheMagicalBear
Pooky got your back
User avatar
User avatar
PookyTheMagicalBear
Pooky got your back
Pooky got your back
Posts: 40525
Joined: August 17, 2003

Post Post #407 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 9:57 am

Post by PookyTheMagicalBear »

This sucks.
User avatar
TrustGossip
TrustGossip
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
TrustGossip
Goon
Goon
Posts: 401
Joined: April 30, 2007
Location: Connecticut

Post Post #408 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 11:18 am

Post by TrustGossip »

L/A ---> Wednesday
Compcrack

Basically crack.
User avatar
Claus
Claus
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Claus
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1734
Joined: June 1, 2007
Location: Tsukuba

Post Post #409 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 1:30 pm

Post by Claus »

Okay. This has taken too long already. Deadline hits in Feb 11, 00:01 GMT (1 week).

On the deadline, longest 2-vote lead will determine the fired doctor. 1-vote ties will be decided randomly. No votes will mean a random firing.

I'm still working on a TheJiveMachine replacement.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVVmAG0RXmo
User avatar
Claus
Claus
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Claus
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1734
Joined: June 1, 2007
Location: Tsukuba

Post Post #410 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 2:07 pm

Post by Claus »

Beep! Beep! replaces The Jive Machine effective immediately.

The deadline is still up, but it is retractable if activity picks up.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVVmAG0RXmo
User avatar
Erg0
Erg0
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Erg0
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4157
Joined: February 25, 2007
Location: Secret Aussie.

Post Post #411 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 2:10 pm

Post by Erg0 »

Huzzah!

Beep, your predecessor was coming under some pressure so we're looking for some content from you. Once you've read, can we have a rundown of your thoughts on the game so far?
"You were doing well until everyone died."
V/LA most weekends.
User avatar
vollkan
vollkan
The Interrogator
User avatar
User avatar
vollkan
The Interrogator
The Interrogator
Posts: 5373
Joined: March 29, 2007
Location: Australia

Post Post #412 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 2:21 pm

Post by vollkan »

Welcome Beep and thanks for replacing. I'm interested to hear your thoughts on things so far.
User avatar
Beep! Beep!
Beep! Beep!
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Beep! Beep!
Goon
Goon
Posts: 496
Joined: February 3, 2008
Location: Strips of asphalt

Post Post #413 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 2:25 pm

Post by Beep! Beep! »

I'm halfway reading.

Thoughts so far.

Pooky might be scum with one of Shafted, Karma, or Adel - because they launched the game with distancing.

TrustGossip might be scum with one of Dean, Volkan, Adel -a gain early game distancing.
Beep! Beep!
User avatar
Beep! Beep!
Beep! Beep!
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Beep! Beep!
Goon
Goon
Posts: 496
Joined: February 3, 2008
Location: Strips of asphalt

Post Post #414 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 2:31 pm

Post by Beep! Beep! »

Later, but still early in the game, prime distancing time:

CuriousKarmaDog, Shafted voted Adel

So I see links between Pooky-CKD-Shafted and Adel.

I will now concentrate on these 4 players.
Beep! Beep!
User avatar
Beep! Beep!
Beep! Beep!
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Beep! Beep!
Goon
Goon
Posts: 496
Joined: February 3, 2008
Location: Strips of asphalt

Post Post #415 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 2:45 pm

Post by Beep! Beep! »

Pooky votes:
CKD
Adel
JM/BB
says I'm scum, but does not vote me.
makes good points against vollkan, 3 long posts in fact, but does not vote vollkan.
claims armlx is scum, but does not vote armlx.

I don't fully grasp the mechanics of this game, Pooky, can you explain why you voted CKD and Adel, but shied from voting me, armlx, and especially vollkan?
Beep! Beep!
User avatar
Beep! Beep!
Beep! Beep!
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Beep! Beep!
Goon
Goon
Posts: 496
Joined: February 3, 2008
Location: Strips of asphalt

Post Post #416 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 2:53 pm

Post by Beep! Beep! »

CKD votes:
Pooky
Adel - but later unvoted
armlx on a hunch

I find that CKD is exceptionally non-committal (the "question" to "statement" ratio is unusually high, to be precise), many short posts, little content, until...
His post 37 appears sincere, but I can't be sure. Post 38 appears sincere, too. Also post 44. Mmm. I don't think CKD is scum.
Beep! Beep!
User avatar
Beep! Beep!
Beep! Beep!
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Beep! Beep!
Goon
Goon
Posts: 496
Joined: February 3, 2008
Location: Strips of asphalt

Post Post #417 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 3:06 pm

Post by Beep! Beep! »

Adel votes:
Pooky
TG
Erg0 - for no good reason at all
JM/BB - also bad vote
cavalier dismissal of CKD's linking of armlx with herself
unvotes JM/BB, then back again.
Then votes armlx, (distancing in response to CKD's accurate observation of an Adel/armlx link?)
unvote JM/BB - AGAIN!!!
Then votes armlx... again!!!
Beep! Beep!
User avatar
Beep! Beep!
Beep! Beep!
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Beep! Beep!
Goon
Goon
Posts: 496
Joined: February 3, 2008
Location: Strips of asphalt

Post Post #418 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 3:16 pm

Post by Beep! Beep! »

shafted votes:
Adel
Contentwise, seems town. Good content, logical, rock solid. No complaint from me.

I'm also going to look at amrlx because of the Adel connection.

armlx votes:
Erg0
Adel
CKD
JM/BB
shafted
JM/BB
I don't like this sentence: " Early game I acted moderately scummy to draw responses, responded with a fairly detailed analysis based on my observations and some gut feelings on intangible things I had observed."
His player analysis is very superficial.
In his post 37, he goes deeper, but many of his opinions are the opposite of common sense.
I don't like the interaction with CKD, mainly because amrlx's reasons are poor, and CKD seems town.
He's berating lurkers, but forgiving Pooky for being his usual disruptive self. Double standards, I do not like.
Beep! Beep!
User avatar
Beep! Beep!
Beep! Beep!
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Beep! Beep!
Goon
Goon
Posts: 496
Joined: February 3, 2008
Location: Strips of asphalt

Post Post #419 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 3:18 pm

Post by Beep! Beep! »

Top scum:

Armlx - Adel - Pooky (by association) - shafted (only because of the way scummy players react to him).

That'll be all for today.
Beep! Beep!
User avatar
Beep! Beep!
Beep! Beep!
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Beep! Beep!
Goon
Goon
Posts: 496
Joined: February 3, 2008
Location: Strips of asphalt

Post Post #420 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 3:20 pm

Post by Beep! Beep! »

Oh, another thing. I'm only allowed to vote for my non-team members, right?

In this case, between Pooky and armlx, I'll pick armlx.

vote: armlx
Beep! Beep!
User avatar
Erg0
Erg0
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Erg0
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4157
Joined: February 25, 2007
Location: Secret Aussie.

Post Post #421 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 3:40 pm

Post by Erg0 »

Well, I guess that qualfies as content. I think Beep has been eliminated as a default lynch candidate at this point.
"You were doing well until everyone died."
V/LA most weekends.
User avatar
curiouskarmadog
curiouskarmadog
This Space for Rant
User avatar
User avatar
curiouskarmadog
This Space for Rant
This Space for Rant
Posts: 14229
Joined: June 17, 2007
Location: Roanoke, Va

Post Post #422 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 4:27 pm

Post by curiouskarmadog »

oh 8 posts in a row..cant wait for an armix next post
NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE
User avatar
Erg0
Erg0
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Erg0
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4157
Joined: February 25, 2007
Location: Secret Aussie.

Post Post #423 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 4:33 pm

Post by Erg0 »

LOL
"You were doing well until everyone died."
V/LA most weekends.
User avatar
Claus
Claus
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Claus
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1734
Joined: June 1, 2007
Location: Tsukuba

Post Post #424 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 4:54 pm

Post by Claus »

Aaaaaaand, that's the Hammer! At least one of them, I mean.

Dr. Armix, team LU has decided that you should be given the boot. I'll wait for team NLU's final decision before showing you the door.

Vote Count


Team LU

Armlx 3 - Karma, Adel, Beep!
- To be Fired
Not voting:
Volkan, Shafted

Team NLU


Beep! 1 - TG

Not voting:
Erg0, DH, Pooky, Armix

3 to lynch.

==============
Armix lynch is locked - further votes and unvotes from team LU have no effect. Armix may still vote, together with team NLU, to determine the second lynchee.

Firing and cardflipping will only happen after the second lynchee has been determined.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVVmAG0RXmo

Return to “Completed Mini Theme Games”