Mini #537 Happy Tree Friends Mafia - Game Over

[Phate]

Unvote
Vote: ZoneAce

[ZONEACE]

Unvote
Vote: ZoneAce

yeah that makes sense.


way to be smart

[Phate]

It does. It is.

I'll explain later.

[ZONEACE]

no its not, it just further proves that you are in fact scum.

can we end this? PLEASE.

[Phate]

Translation: "I am voting someone without explaining my reasoning, other than a vague 'I'll explain later.' I'm town. You are voting someone without explaining your reasoning other than a vague 'I'll explain later.' You're clearly scum. So stop voting me now, PLEASE."

Hmm... no.

How about you make a case against me?

[JDodge]

Phate, if you're going to try to emulate my playstyle, could you actually become a good mafia player?

Thanks.

[Phate]

I wasn't trying to emulate your playstyle, actually.

Fuck you.

[ZONEACE]

now now children, let's behave, and lynch phate.

[JDodge]

I wasn't trying to emulate your playstyle, actually.

Fuck you.

Then can you at least try the "good mafia player" part?

[Phate]

Working on it.

[ZONEACE]

not hard enough

[Phate]

*grin* I might be insulted if that came from someone other than you.

[ZONEACE]

you wont be smiling when its proved i found all the scum in my first game relevant post.

[Phate]

You may be right. I'll wait until you make a game relevant post to see.

[ZONEACE]

har har har. just keep digging, the less work we have to do when its time to bury you, the better.

[JDodge]

i find it incredibly ironic that you accuse ZONEFACE of not adding anything to game in the middle of an argument that doesn't add anything to the game

[ZONEACE]

thats extreme ironing.

[Phate]

Ironing, eh?

Translation: "I am voting someone without explaining my reasoning, other than a vague 'I'll explain later.' I'm town. You are voting someone without explaining your reasoning other than a vague 'I'll explain later.' You're clearly scum. So stop voting me now, PLEASE."

Hmm... no.

How about you make a case against me?

Or at least explain the inconsistency in the post I'm referring to.

Or do anything at all besides weak attempts at flaming, really.

[ZONEACE]

ive explained, everyone of your actions is scummy. your behavior day one. you behavior day 2 in regards to the Sens lynching, and now your OMGUS behavior today. You're very scummy. and need to die. after that

[ZONEACE]

EBWOP,

MOD can we prods on Rigel and Pacone

I realize its the weekend but their posting has SUCKED. yesterday i think they both only posted like 3 times between the 2 of them and thats unacceptable.

[Phate]

ZONEACE, you haven't, though. Saying my actions are scummy != making a case.

What scummy actions have I taken? What about my D1 behaviour is scummy (besides "all of them"... -_-)? Why?

What about my behaviour during the D2 lynch was scummy? Keep in mind that if I was indeed mafia, then I would be 'defending' someone I thought was a townie in spite of the momentum against him.

[competentpsycho]

ive explained,

everyone of your actions is scummy

. your behavior day one.

you behavior day 2 in regards to the Sens lynching

, and now your OMGUS behavior today. You're very scummy. and need to die. after that

Green = defeating your own argument.

Also, I am afraid Phate is right, you haven't explained WHY his actions are scummy. By your logic I could say "ZA is a jester because his actions are jester-like" but that neither proves that you are a jester or that your actions are jester-like, just because I say so. Stop acting like JDodge and give examples and explain why.

On a side note, speaking of jesters got me thinking - pacone. Anyone else get that vibe, or am I just being paranoid?

[ZONEACE]

you're being paranoid about pacone. not a jester.

[kuribo]

On a side note, speaking of jesters got me thinking - pacone. Anyone else get that vibe, or am I just being paranoid?

No, you're either paranoid or scum. Why would you think there's a jester?

[Rigel]

I'm not sure that I like the way that the discussion has turned on Phate all of a sudden. Yes, Phate's defense of Sensfan was scummy on Day 2, but the truth is that if Phate is scum, he wouldn't have known that Sensfan was mafia-aligned. Therefore, saying that his defense of Sensfan makes him scummy makes no sense.

How, this by no means clears Phate. He still could be scum, and I plan on looking of evidence to support that in Day 1. But jumping on him for his actions on Day 2 and 3 doesn't help when those actions, looked at objectively, wouldn't help the mafia, and therefore would be horrible plays if Phate was scum.

And why has no one brought up the fact that FTIP was a shrink? This gives us a guaranteed serial killer, unless Fairy cured them on Night 1. And someone killed her during the day--that's something we should be looking at as well. I just don't see where this Phate thing is going, and unless some non-Sensfan-supporting evidence can be found, I think we should shelve the matter until we can determine exactly what occurred overnight.

Barring that, I'm willing to go for a Pacone-lynch, because he's useless, not present 98% of the time, and is acting anti-town with his lack of providing info. So either we should look at what happened last night, or lynch Pacone.